View clinical trials related to Polyps.
Filter by:Careful inspection and evaluation of the post-polipectomy scars of polyps greater than 20 mm looking for residual polyp is mandatory. LCI has demonstrated to improve polyp and adenoma detection rate in previous studies. However, to our knowledge no previous studies have been made for validation of LCI for optical diagnosis of a scar looking for residual neoplasia after a previous polypectomy. We hypothesize that LCI will improve the optical diagnosis of polyp recurrence compared to WLE. So, our aim is to compare the efficacy of linked color imaging for optical diagnosis of post-polypectomy scar recurrence compared with high-definition white light endoscopy.
Colonoscopy is currently the best method of detection of intestinal tumors and polyps, particularly because polyps can also be biopsied and removed. There is a clear correlation between the adenoma detection rate and prevented carcinomas, so adenoma detection rate is the main parameter for the outcome quality of diagnostic colonoscopy. The efficiency of preventive colonoscopy needs optimisation by increase in adenoma detection rate, as it is known from many studies that approximately 15-30% of all adenomas can be overlooked. This mainly applies to smaller and flat adenomas. However, since even smaller polyps may be relevant for colorectal cancer development, the aim of colonoscopy should be to preferably be able to recognize all polyps and other changes.The latest and by far the most interesting development in this field is the use of artificial intelligence systems. They consist of a switched-on software with a small computer connected to the endoscope processor; the patient's introduced endoscope is completely unchanged. The present study therefore compares the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of the latest generation of devices with high-resolution imaging from Fujifilm with and without the connection of artificial intelligence.
Overall Objective: To optimize timing of surveillance colonoscopy. Principal research question and specific aims: To assess the impact of access to a hand-held application on the timing of surveillance colonoscopy. To assess whether access to the tool improves adherence to recommended guidelines for follow-up colonoscopy intervals. Colonoscopy is commonly used for surveillance of patients with high risk of developing colorectal cancer, including those with family history of colorectal cancer and those with colorectal polyps. The recommended timing of surveillance colonoscopy varies by the estimated risk for development of colorectal cancer. The estimated risk varies by family history of colorectal cancer (number of affected individuals, age of the persons affected with CRC) and characteristics of the colorectal polyps (size, number, and histology of colorectal polyps (tubular or villous; high grade or low-grade dysplasia; sessile serrated polyp, sessile serrated polyp with dysplasia, hyperplastic polyp or traditional serrated adenomas). Guidelines take all of these factors into account in the recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy and hence are difficult to recall for the busy clinicians. Colonoscopy surveillance is frequently performed at shorter or longer than the recommended time intervals. The investigators have developed a smart phone application in which the characteristics of the patients can be inputted and the tool provides the recommended time interval for surveillance colonoscopy, based on North American guidelines. The investigators are proposing a pilot randomized trial to determine sample size estimates for a larger trial to assess the utility of this application in clinical practice.
Is ORISE Gel an effective and feasible submucosal injecting solution during endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps.
This is a clinical trial assessing gastroenterology fellows' accuracy of colonic polyp measurement using a Micro-Tech Endoscopic Polyp Measurement Device named Napoleon. The study will evaluate the feasibility of Napoleon as a polyp measurement device. Investigators will collect data on inpatient and outpatient colonoscopies performed by fellows at NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Hospital Brooklyn, Bellevue Hospital Center, and Manhattan VA Medical Center from May 2021 - May 2022 for 150 patients. Investigators will include all colonoscopies with polyps done in adults age 45 and above. For each colonoscopy, a fellow will first visually estimate the polyp size and then measure the polyp with Napoleon. Investigators will calculate the difference in polyp measurement between visual assessment and using Napoleon for each fellow year and compare differences among fellow years. Investigators will evaluate for changes in fellows' accuracy of polyp measurement with subsequent uses of Napoleon. Investigators will determine the proportion of cases with a change in the recommended surveillance interval based on polyp size. A survey will be given to all fellows to assess the level of ease with using Napoleon.
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the pimary surgical treatment of CRS, characterized with the preservation of nasal structure and function.But the control of disease by surgery has been unsatisfactory. Recent studies have shown that patients with recurrent CRSwNP (usually with severe eosinophilic inflammation), more radical surgery may be more effective. The purpose of this prospective and randomized study is to determine the effect of endoscopic sinus surgery for extensive mucosal removal in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitus with nasal polyps.
Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an emerging technique for endoscopic resection. The purpose of this research is to observ wether the UEMR for medium-sized pedunculated polyps is safe and effective.
Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is a promising tool to avoid risks of unnecessary polypectomies and to save costs of tissue pathology. NICE (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic) and WASP (Workgroup on Serrated Polyps and Polyposis) classification were developed for diagnosis of adenomatous and sessile serrated polyps, respectively.
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and has been widely used technique for the treatment of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Although, conventional EMR (CEMR) showed high efficacy for the management of colorectal superficial neoplasms, there is problematic limitation in this technique - incomplete resection. In literature, the anchoring-tip EMR (AEMR), named as "Tip-in EMR" was first introduced in 2016 from Japan. Recently, several retrospective studies have been suggested about the effectiveness of AEMR. However, there has been no prospective randomized controlled study to identify its advantage over CEMR. Therefore, the investigators performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to estimate the effectiveness of AEMR compared with CEMR for the endoscopic treatment of intermediate-size (10 to 20 mm) colorectal polyps.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the third most common malignant tumor and is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Adenomatous polyps of the colon are possible precursor lesions for CRC. Screening for CRC has been shown effective in preventing CRC and related deaths, especially colonoscopy and resection of adenomatous polyps. Currently, for intermediate sized polyps 5 - 19 mm hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with the use of electrocautery is conventionally used, causing relevant adverse events including haemorrhage and postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome, but is safe regarding complete resection of the polyp due to burning effect on residual tissue. On the other hand, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has grown popularity. Absence of electrocautery makes it technically easier and most important reduces adverse events. CSP is recommended as the preferred technique for polyps <5 mm by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. In literature, there is one multicenter trial from Japan recommending CSP for polyps 4-9 mm (average polyp size 5,4 mm) and only a few case studies for polyps 10-15 mm with inconsistent results, especially regarding the complete resection and pathological evaluation of the specimen. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators want to compare the complete resection rates of small and intermediate sized colorectal polyps 5-15 mm with CSP and HSP.