Promotion of Active Lifestyle in Pneumonia Patients

Pneumonia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Rehabilitation Program for Promotion Active Lifestyle After Suffering a Pneumonia

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06206980
• Other study ID #: DF0100UG
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 20, 2024
• Est. completion date: June 2024

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: Universidad de Granada
• Contact: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD
• Phone: 958 248035
• Email: cvalenza[@]ugr.es
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients who have suffered a pneumonia used to reduce their activity levels because of the symptoms and the fear to suffer breathlessness. These patients often have sequelae after the hospitalization that previous studies have associated with a lack of physical activity.

The main objective of this research is to investigate the efficacy of a rehabilitation program for promotion higher activity levels in quality of life and self-perceived discapacity of pneumonia patients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 66
• Est. completion date: June 2024
• Est. primary completion date: March 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients of both sexes.

• Agreed to participate.

• Pneumonia patients meeting the diagnosis criteria for this disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Neurological or orthopaedic pathologies that limited voluntary movement.

• Cognitive impairment that prevented them from understanding and answering the questionnaires.

• Patients who don´t understand Spanish language

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pneumonia

Intervention

Other:
• Physical Activity Promotion
This intervention includes a hospital-based and a home-based intervention. During the hospital stay, the patients were provided with a health education which included information about pneumonia pathophysiology, healthy-lifestyle habits, benefits of being physically active, and any questions patients may have would be answered. Additionally, an exercise program is provided, which includes resistance and aerobic exercise. At the end of the hospital stay, a diary is provided to patients for recording the physical activity that performing the following 3 months. This diary is accompanied by phone calls at 15 days, 1 and 2 months of the hospital stay. During the phone calls, patients are motivated to increase their activity levels, and any questions patients may have, are answered.
• Control Intervention
Patients received an informational brochure in a consultation with a health professional. The brochure explained the importance of physical activity to improve the health condition of these patients. Patients had the opportunity to ask any questions to the healthcare professional

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada	Granada

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universidad de Granada

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in discapacity	Changes in self-perceived discapacity were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The punctuation range from 36 to 144, and higher score indicate higher disability, worse.	Baseline
Primary	Changes in discapacity	Changes in self-perceived discapacity were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The punctuation range from 36 to 144, and higher score indicate higher disability, worse.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Primary	Changes in discapacity	Changes in self-perceived discapacity were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The punctuation range from 36 to 144, and higher score indicate higher disability, worse.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Primary	Quality of life measure with EuroQol-5D-5L	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions. (Eq-5D) which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.	Baseline
Primary	Quality of life measure with EuroQol-5D-5L	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Primary	Quality of life measure with EuroQol-5D-5L	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Primary	Physical Activity Levels measure with IPAQ	The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed to measure health-related physical activity (PA) in populations. The activities are classified as vigorous, moderate and walking, and total METs are calculated. NO minimum or maximum valors are stablished. Higher scores indicates higher physical activity levels. Better.	Baseline
Primary	Physical Activity Levels measure with IPAQ	The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed to measure health-related physical activity (PA) in populations. The activities are classified as vigorous, moderate and walking, and total METs are calculated. NO minimum or maximum valors are stablished. Higher scores indicates higher physical activity levels. Better.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Primary	Dyspnoea measure with Borg Scale	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.	Baseline
Primary	Dyspnoea measure with Borg Scale	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Primary	Dyspnoea measure with Borg Scale	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Secondary	Changes in Breathlessness Beliefs	The Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a concise 10-item self-report assessment tool used in the realm of respiratory health. It gauges an individual's perceptions and beliefs regarding breathlessness or dyspnea. Respondents rate their agreement with statements on a scale, often ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting their thoughts about the causes, consequences, and controllability of breathlessness. Higher scores may indicate more negative beliefs, while lower scores suggest more positive or adaptive beliefs. The BBQ aids in tailoring interventions and treatments for individuals with respiratory conditions, shedding light on the cognitive factors contributing to breathlessness-related distress and ultimately improving patient well-being and functional outcomes.	Baseline
Secondary	Changes in Breathlessness Beliefs	The Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a concise 10-item self-report assessment tool used in the realm of respiratory health. It gauges an individual's perceptions and beliefs regarding breathlessness or dyspnea. Respondents rate their agreement with statements on a scale, often ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting their thoughts about the causes, consequences, and controllability of breathlessness. Higher scores may indicate more negative beliefs, while lower scores suggest more positive or adaptive beliefs. The BBQ aids in tailoring interventions and treatments for individuals with respiratory conditions, shedding light on the cognitive factors contributing to breathlessness-related distress and ultimately improving patient well-being and functional outcomes.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in Breathlessness Beliefs	The Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a concise 10-item self-report assessment tool used in the realm of respiratory health. It gauges an individual's perceptions and beliefs regarding breathlessness or dyspnea. Respondents rate their agreement with statements on a scale, often ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting their thoughts about the causes, consequences, and controllability of breathlessness. Higher scores may indicate more negative beliefs, while lower scores suggest more positive or adaptive beliefs. The BBQ aids in tailoring interventions and treatments for individuals with respiratory conditions, shedding light on the cognitive factors contributing to breathlessness-related distress and ultimately improving patient well-being and functional outcomes.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Secondary	Changes in Symptoms	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.	Baseline
Secondary	Changes in Symptoms	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in Symptoms	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Secondary	Changes in Psycho-emotional status	The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) scale asks respondents to answer 21 questions focused on experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the past week.; Participants were provided four response options: 0=never, 1=sometimes, 2=a lot of the time, 3=most or all of the time. Higher response values, and higher scores, indicate higher levels of experiencing the condition measured.	Baseline
Secondary	Changes in Psycho-emotional status	The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) scale asks respondents to answer 21 questions focused on experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the past week.; Participants were provided four response options: 0=never, 1=sometimes, 2=a lot of the time, 3=most or all of the time. Higher response values, and higher scores, indicate higher levels of experiencing the condition measured.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in Psycho-emotional status	The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) scale asks respondents to answer 21 questions focused on experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the past week.; Participants were provided four response options: 0=never, 1=sometimes, 2=a lot of the time, 3=most or all of the time. Higher response values, and higher scores, indicate higher levels of experiencing the condition measured.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge]
Secondary	Changes in Performance status	The performance status is measure with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In a semi structured interview, the patient is encouraged to discuss areas of activity that may present problems that they may need to, want to, or are expected to carry out on a regular basis. These problem areas are then rated in terms of importance to the patient´s life using the rating scale from 1 - 10, where 1 = not at all important, and 10 = extremely important to the client. The five most important problems are then the focus of intervention and the outcome measurement. The patient, using a similar scale, is then asked to rate his/her perception of performance and satisfaction with this performance in the selected problem areas. The two scores are separately summed and divided by the number of problem areas, giving the mean foreach.	Baseline
Secondary	Changes in Performance status	The performance status is measure with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In a semi structured interview, the patient is encouraged to discuss areas of activity that may present problems that they may need to, want to, or are expected to carry out on a regular basis. These problem areas are then rated in terms of importance to the patient´s life using the rating scale from 1 - 10, where 1 = not at all important, and 10 = extremely important to the client. The five most important problems are then the focus of intervention and the outcome measurement. The patient, using a similar scale, is then asked to rate his/her perception of performance and satisfaction with this performance in the selected problem areas. The two scores are separately summed and divided by the number of problem areas, giving the mean foreach.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in Performance status	The performance status is measure with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In a semi structured interview, the patient is encouraged to discuss areas of activity that may present problems that they may need to, want to, or are expected to carry out on a regular basis. These problem areas are then rated in terms of importance to the patient´s life using the rating scale from 1 - 10, where 1 = not at all important, and 10 = extremely important to the client. The five most important problems are then the focus of intervention and the outcome measurement. The patient, using a similar scale, is then asked to rate his/her perception of performance and satisfaction with this performance in the selected problem areas. The two scores are separately summed and divided by the number of problem areas, giving the mean foreach.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Secondary	Changes in managing the own healthcare	The Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) is a concise assessment tool designed to evaluate an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing their own healthcare. Comprising 13 items, this self-report questionnaire helps healthcare professionals and researchers gauge a patient's level of activation and engagement in their healthcare journey. Respondents answer a series of questions related to their health-related knowledge, confidence in managing their health, and their proactivity in seeking healthcare information and making informed decisions. The score range from 13 to 52. Higher PAM-13 scores indicate a higher level of patient activation, which is often associated with better health outcomes and more effective self-management of chronic conditions.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in managing the own healthcare	The Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) is a concise assessment tool designed to evaluate an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing their own healthcare. Comprising 13 items, this self-report questionnaire helps healthcare professionals and researchers gauge a patient's level of activation and engagement in their healthcare journey. Respondents answer a series of questions related to their health-related knowledge, confidence in managing their health, and their proactivity in seeking healthcare information and making informed decisions. The score range from 13 to 52. Higher PAM-13 scores indicate a higher level of patient activation, which is often associated with better health outcomes and more effective self-management of chronic conditions.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Secondary	Changes in physical functioning	The physical functioning is measured using the "Short Physical Performance Battery" (SPPB). To assess usual walking speed (meters/second), the participants were asked to walk 4 metro at their regular pace twice from a standing position. The standing balance tests included side-by-side, semi-tandem, and full-tandem standing, and the participants were timed until they moved, or 10 s had elapsed. To assess the 5-times sit-to-stand test, the participants were asked to perform five chair stands as quickly as possible. Time (in seconds) was registered with a stopwatch with a resolution of 0.01 s. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 points (best). An increase of 1-point is recommended in disability research.	Baseline
Secondary	Changes in physical functioning	The physical functioning is measured using the "Short Physical Performance Battery" (SPPB). To assess usual walking speed (meters/second), the participants were asked to walk 4 metro at their regular pace twice from a standing position. The standing balance tests included side-by-side, semi-tandem, and full-tandem standing, and the participants were timed until they moved, or 10 s had elapsed. To assess the 5-times sit-to-stand test, the participants were asked to perform five chair stands as quickly as possible. Time (in seconds) was registered with a stopwatch with a resolution of 0.01 s. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 points (best). An increase of 1-point is recommended in disability research.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in physical functioning	The physical functioning is measured using the "Short Physical Performance Battery" (SPPB). To assess usual walking speed (meters/second), the participants were asked to walk 4 metro at their regular pace twice from a standing position. The standing balance tests included side-by-side, semi-tandem, and full-tandem standing, and the participants were timed until they moved, or 10 s had elapsed. To assess the 5-times sit-to-stand test, the participants were asked to perform five chair stands as quickly as possible. Time (in seconds) was registered with a stopwatch with a resolution of 0.01 s. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 points (best). An increase of 1-point is recommended in disability research.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Secondary	Changes in Maximal Grip Strength	Maximal grip strength was assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. The participant was told to squeeze it as hard as possible and then release. This procedure was repeated three times with each hand alternating between both hands with 5 minutes rest between the trials. The grip strength was recorded in kg and the highest of the three trials was used.	Baseline
Secondary	Changes in Maximal Grip Strength	Maximal grip strength was assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. The participant was told to squeeze it as hard as possible and then release. This procedure was repeated three times with each hand alternating between both hands with 5 minutes rest between the trials. The grip strength was recorded in kg and the highest of the three trials was used.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Secondary	Changes in Maximal Grip Strength	Maximal grip strength was assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. The participant was told to squeeze it as hard as possible and then release. This procedure was repeated three times with each hand alternating between both hands with 5 minutes rest between the trials. The grip strength was recorded in kg and the highest of the three trials was used.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge