Clinical Trials Logo

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01138540 Terminated - Clinical trials for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

The Gravity-VAP (Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia) Trial

Gravity-VAP
Start date: November 2010
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study is planned to compare, in patients sedated, intubated and mechanically ventilated, the efficacy and safety of the Lateral Trendelenburg position in comparison to the Semirecumbent Position to prevent incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

NCT ID: NCT01135277 Completed - Sepsis Clinical Trials

Immune Suppression and Ventilator Associated Pneumonias

iVAP
Start date: February 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Patients in the ICU are already predisposed to nosocomial infections, which are both costly and potentially life threatening, and it appears that the immune paralysis of sepsis may put these patients at greater risk for secondary infections, though this has not been proven conclusively. One measure of this sepsis-induced immune suppression is monocyte deactivation. The investigators hypothesize that, as a cornerstone of the monocytic innate immune response to infection, the inflammasome is critical to monocyte function during sepsis.

NCT ID: NCT01126320 Completed - Clinical trials for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Frequency of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Using the AnapnoGuard System

Start date: December 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is a common complication experienced by mechanically ventilated patients and within the framework of Respiratory Intensive Care Units. The AnapnoGuard system, developed by Hospitech Respiration Ltd. is a ventilation guard system that includes a number of unique characteristics. This study was designed to test the frequency VAP in mechanically ventilated ICU patients using the AnapnoGuard System.

NCT ID: NCT01123681 Active, not recruiting - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Intubation and Extubation Over 48 Hours Mechanical Ventilation

INDEX48
Start date: May 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to determine how often ventilator associated pneumonia happens in the current intensive care units, and how types of endotracheal tube affect its occurrence.

NCT ID: NCT01118403 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neurological Patients

NAVPRO
Start date: March 2011
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study seeks to assess whether coma patients really benefit from the use of antibiotics as a prophylactic for reducing the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia in this population group. For this we consider the use of ampicillin sulbactam antibiotic which has a low ability to induce resistance, efficacy and safety observed during the time that has been used, even in patients with neurosurgical pathology, and to be broadly available in our environment. Our hypothesis is that neurological patients in coma state, requiring mechanical ventilation, the application of antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo reduces the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia.

NCT ID: NCT01110421 Terminated - Clinical trials for Pneumonia, Bacterial

A Safety and Tolerability Study of Doripenem Compared With Cefepime in Hospitalized Children With Bacterial Pneumonia

Start date: December 2010
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of doripenem compared to cefepime in children hospitalized with pneumonia.

NCT ID: NCT01110109 Completed - Clinical trials for Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

Removing Fluid Above Breathing Tubes in the Operating Room

Start date: April 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

In this study, subjects meeting criteria will be enrolled and randomized to one of two different suctioning schemes, either continuous or intermittent. Accumulated secretions will be collected above the cuff on the breathing tube by one of the two methods depending on which group the subject is randomized into. Secretions will continue to be collected at predetermined periods of time for the duration of surgery in order to characterize the pH and volume as well as the micro-organism content.

NCT ID: NCT01105819 Completed - Clinical trials for Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

Chlorhexidine vs Lactobacillus Plantarum for Oral Care in Intubated ICU Patients

Start date: April 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Critically ill patients often need ventilatory support through a plastic tube connected to a ventilator. Those patients have a altered microbiological flora in the mouth, oropharynx as well as throughout the intestine. Bacteria that can cause illness are often found in the oropharynx in such patients and measures are taken in order to reduce the risk of secondary infections by those bacteria. In all intensive care patients oral care is provided by the nursing staff aiming at a reduction of the pathogenic species. This is done by a variety measures. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is an antisepticum with a capability to reduce bacterial counts in the mouth and oropharynx and has been shown to be of value also for intubated patients. It is used frequently throughout the world. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a costly rather frequent complication to intensive care and mechanical ventilation and is usually caused by aspiration of infected secretions from the oropharynx. CHX has in some studies been shown to reduce the frequency of VAP. The probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 299 has the ability to adhere to the mucosa throughout the gastro-intestinal tract including the mouth and in our pilot study we found that L plantarum had better ability to reduce colonisation with enteric bacteria in the oropharynx than CHX had. Figures not statistical significant so this present study is aiming to get a larger amount of data. The procedure was found to be safe Hypothesis: Lactobacillus plantarum is better than CHX for the reduction of pathogenic bacteria in the oropharynx in intubated mechanically ventilated patients and consequently has a better potential to reduce the frequency of VAP

NCT ID: NCT01083407 Completed - Clinical trials for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Oral Care Interventions and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Children

Start date: June 2005
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This experimental study aims to verify the influence of the oral hygiene performance with chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% in the development of VAP in children. The data collection begun in April, 2005 during the performance of the masters degree course dissertation entitled "Clinical study about the effect of the oral hygiene with chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% in the oropharynx colonization of children in intensive care", being performed in a PICU of nine beds in a university hospital in the city of São Paulo, after approval of the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. The study is composed by three types of variables: Independent variable, dependent variables, and complementary variables. The categorical variables will be analyzed in accordance with the Person's Chi-Square test of or Fisher's exact test. The numerics will be submitted to the analysis of variance ANOVA or Kruskall Wallis. For variables with heterogeneous distribution between the groups, the multivariate analysis will be applied to the evaluation of the influence in the determination of the development risk of the dependent variable. The rejection level will be fixed in 0.05 of the nullity hypothesis.

NCT ID: NCT01069185 Completed - Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trials

Differences in Morbidity Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning

Start date: February 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.