View clinical trials related to Pleural Infection.
Filter by:pleural infection remains a common medical problem with significant mortality and morbidity despite a better undrstanding of the aetiology , pathophysiology and recent advances in management approaches . the cornerstones of the managment op pleural infection include early identification of cases and accurate diagnosis . suitable antibiotic therapy , nutrition managment , efficient drainage of infected collection via chest tube with or without adjunctive therapies including intrapleural agents and ultimately surgical managment .
The PROSPECT study aims to look at the number of problems or side effects which occur after patients have had a procedure completed to remove fluid or air from the space between the lung and the chest wall. Other information will also be collected to see whether anything else affects which patients have problems after the procedure such as bleeding or infection. This study will also investigate whether it is possible to find out which patients are likely to feel a lot better after the procedure. Not all patients feel significantly better but it is not clear why this is. There are a number of different reasons patients may not feel better, for example if the lung is not able to fully re-expand. The study aims to look at whether it is possible to predict these problems before the procedure using ultrasound. If it is possible to find the answers to some of these questions it might be possible to prevent patients undergoing treatments which are not likely to benefit them. The study will use information already collected as part of clinical care, as well as questionnaires from patients receiving care at a variety of centres. The different features of these centres will also be considered in analysis.
Parapneumonic effusions caused by an infection of the pleural membranes occur in 40-57% of cases of pneumonia. A variable percentage (10-20%) of parapneumonic effusions progresses to empyema (pus) and/or abscess formation (encapsulation). Pleural infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality which may be as high as 20-35% in immunocompromised patients Standard treatment of these collections in adults involves antibiotic therapy, effective drainage of infected fluid and surgical intervention if conservative management fails. For parapneumonic effusions which require clearance, appropriate therapy is effective drainage via an intercostal catheter (ICC) with antibiotic therapy. The presence of fibrinous septae in the pleural space, known as loculations, may result in inadequate drainage of effusions and therefore non-resolution of infection and systemic sepsis. Without effective intercostal catheter drainage, surgical intervention (VATS or open) has usually been required to clear loculations for resolution of infection. Non-surgical treatment options to reduce the impact of adhesions and locule include (in addition to appropriate antibiotic therapy) single and multiple thoracocentesis, or single and multiple intercostal tube thoracostomies, with or without intrapleural fibrinolytic agents. Fibrinolytic agents including streptokinase, urokinase, alteplase and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) have been used safely and effectively intrapleurally for complicated pleural effusion and empyema. MIST 2 trial has established intrapleural therapy as the mainstay of CPEE treatment hence avoiding surgery and decreasing the length of hospitalization; however, little is known about the correct dosage needed for tPA and DNase. Dose and duration of intrapleural therapy based on MIST 2 involve multiple dosing and can be time-consuming for health care providers . Previous studies showed that complexity of treatment is a factor associated with poor adherence to a regimen. For this reason, trying to find the minimum effective dose and simplifying the regimen is essential for minimizing side effects and maximizing adherence. The review of currently available literature shows concurrent administration of tPA and DNase to be safe and effective even at lower cumulative dose Other study was carried out in May 2022 in which Modified regimen intrapleural alteplase 16 mg t-PA with 5 mg DNase for total 3 doses that administered sequentially within 24 h had been used. In this study, modified regimen of t-PA and DNase offer an alternative therapeutic option for patients that are unfit or refuse surgical intervention but persistent pleural infection. They have demonstrated similar treatment success comparable to other studies, as evidenced by improvement on pleural fluid drainage and reduction in pleural opacity on day 7 chest x-ray was approximately 50% from the baseline using intrapleural 16 mg t-PA with 5 mg DNase. The mechanism of action of t-PA and DNase in pleural cavity remain unclear. Studies suggested that IPFT may trigger the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) pathway which promote pleural fluid formation and subsequently causes a therapeutic lavage effect that increases pleural fluid drainage. Another option for intrapleural therapy may be pleural irrigation with normal saline. The idea behind is to dilute and remove bacteria, cytokines, inflammatory cells, and pro-fibrinogenic coagulation factors, which induce pleural fluid organization. Also, the mechanical process of irrigation increases pleural fluid drainage by reducing stasis and organization of the intrapleural contents . A randomised controlled pilot study in which saline pleural irrigation (three times per day for 3 days) plus best-practice management was compared with best-practice management alone was performed in patients with pleural infection requiring chest-tube drainage. The primary outcome was percentage change in computed tomography pleural fluid volume from day 0 to day 3. Patients receiving saline irrigation had a significantly greater reduction in pleural collection volume on computed tomography compared to those receiving standard care. Significantly fewer patients in the irrigation group were referred for surgery (30). However, till date there is no study done on head to head comparison between intrapleural fibrinolytic with alteplase and DNAse Versus Pleural irrigationwith normal saline.
Objectives: A pilot study to compare the therapeutic and safety profiles between low(2.5mg) and standard(10mg) doses of intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator(tPA) in uncontrolled pleural infection. The study design will be tested for its trialability. Hypothesis: 2.5mg tPA has comparable therapeutic efficacy and less bleeding complications to 10mg tPA. Design and subjects: A pilot, single-centre, two-arm, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial(RCT) which includes subjects with uncontrolled pleural infection, with follow-up till 90 days after hospital discharge. Interventions: Recruited subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive a maximum of 6 doses of intrapleural tPA starting at either 2.5mg or 10mg. A clinical decision is allowed at the third dose to continue with the assigned dose or escalate to 10mg to complete the course based on the clinical response, without breaking the blinding. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is survival at 90 days and without the need for surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes include the need for additional pleural interventions, number of decisions to choose 10mg intrapleural tPA at the third dose, clinical and radiographic response after the treatment course, safety profiles especially bleeding complications, and the number and reason for protocol violation. Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis for all randomized subjects. The clinical outcomes will be compared with a regression model built to adjust for confounding covariates. The data on therapeutic efficacy and bleeding complications will inform the power calculation of sample size in subsequent full-scale multicentred RCT incorporating the current study design.
The goal of this study is to compare the microbiologic diagnostic yield of pre-aspiration agitated pleural fluid versus that of conventionally aspirated fluid in pleural infection patients. The main question it aims to answer is, whether fluid agitation helps to increase the microbiological yield.
The antiseptic povidone-iodine can safely be instilled into the pleural for the purpose of pleurodesis. Pleural irrigation with antiseptics is used in adults with open drainage for chronic empyema and has been described in the acute management of paediatric pleural infection. This study will investigate the safety and usefulness of povidone-iodine pleural irrigation in 15 eligible patients recruited to the Pleural Infection Cohort Study (PICS) with acute pleural infection. A matched control group will be used and will be composed of 15 patients previously recruited to PICS without receiving povidone-iodine pleural irrigation.
Infection of the pleural space is serious condition that requires hospitalization, invasive interventions and long courses of antibiotics[1]. Treatment of pleural infection requires long hospital admission with a median of 19 days[2] and medical treatments fails requiring surgical intervention in up to 30% of cases[3]. The mortality from pleural infection is around 10% at 3 months[4]. Besides drainage of the infected fluid, antibiotics are a core component of management of pleural infection[5] and are typically given intravenously in the first few days of treatment until the condition is stabilized at which stage patients are shifted to oral antibiotics of equivalent spectrum. In almost half of the cases of pleural infection, the choice of antibiotics is entirely empirical due to low yield of microbiological tests on pleural fluid in these cases[6]. International guidelines cite a minimum length of antibiotic course of pleural infection of four weeks[5,7] with antibiotic courses typically lasting six weeks[8]. However, these recommendations are based on expert opinion with no robust evidence to support such durations. The RAPID (renal function, age, purulence, infection source and dietary factors) score has recently been validated as a robust tool to predict 3-month mortality of patients with pleural infection based on demographic and laboratory data (table 1)[4]. A low score (0-2) is associated with 2-3% mortality, medium score (3-4) 9% mortality and high score (5-7) 30% mortality at three months[9]. The utility for this score in clinical management is yet to be determined and this study will attempt using this score to stratify lengths of antibiotic treatment based on proposed risk of adverse outcomes as stipulated by the RAPID score. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of prescribing shorter courses of antibiotics (2-3 weeks) versus the standard longer courses (4-6 weeks) in medically-treated patients with pleural infection at lower risk of mortality (RAPID score 0-4) who can be safely discharged home within 14 days of hospitalization and how this impacts success of medical treatment.
Pleural Infection (PI) is a common, severe and complicated disease with considerable morbidity and mortality. (1,2) The knowledge of pleural infection microbiology remains incomplete. Sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene is a reliable methodology to discover the total microbiome of complex samples. The investigators designed a translational metagenomics study to study the bacteriology of pleural infection. The investigators will use pleural fluid specimens from a) the "Prospective validation of the RAPID clinical risk prediction score in adult patients with pleural infection: the PILOT study" (3) clinical trial and b) non-pleural infection patients. The pleural fluid specimens will be subjected to 16S rRNA next generation sequencing.
The incidence of pleural infection is increasing worldwide since the last two decades. Antibiotics are one of the cornerstones of the treatment of this disease and must be associated to a correct evacuation of the pleural effusion. Data concerning the pleural diffusion of antibiotics currently used in community acquired pleural infection are scarce. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the pleural pharmacokinetic of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in patients with a complicated pleural infection (patients who need a chest tube insertion).
We aim to conduct a pilot trial assessing oral versus intravenous therapy for pleural space infections.