View clinical trials related to Platelet-rich Plasma.
Filter by:The French Society of Rheumatology cannot rule on the value of intra-articular injections of PRP due to the lack of hindsight and insufficient data. In fact, the injection protocols are very heterogeneous in terms of preparation method, the presence or not of leukocytes, the number of centrifugations, the volume injected, the ultrasound guidance, which makes it difficult to analyze the literature. The investigator objective is therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of combined injections of PRP and hyaluronic acid.
This study compares arthroscopic partial menisectomy (APM) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) for degenerative meniscal injury of the knee. The current state of knowledge is poor. There are few comparative studies that have been performed and only on surgical treatment or rehabilitation. Moreover, these studies show contradictory results. The main objective of this study is to compare APM and PRPinfiltration, in terms of pain reduction, which is greater with the surgical technique than in the PRP infiltration group. The hypothesis of this study is that there is superiority of surgery over PRP infiltration. The main evaluation criterion is the pre-post-operative pain by a simplified numerical scale.
In chronic diabetic foot ulcer, if the conventional dressing fails, new therapeutic options such as recombinant human growth factors and bioengineered skin substitutes may be beneficial, but the cost is a limiting factor. Autologous platelet rich plasma is a cost-effective method that enhances wound healing by promoting the healing process by local release of growth factors.
To study the effect of platelet-rich plasma concentrate on marginal bone loss and bone mineral density in immediate implant placement through CBCT.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of standardized autologous platelet rich plasma injections into osteoarthritic lumbar facet joints to treat back pain and improve patient function.
The study aims to conduct a randomized trial comparing the clinical outcomes of PRP (standard intervention) versus Microfragmented adipose tissue (investigational) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Hypothesis: Both interventions will result in significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes. We hypothesize that Microfragmented adipose tissue will provide superior outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to compare two different platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for patellar tendinosis. Aim: To perform a randomized, double blinded study comparing the clinical effect of PRP versus PRP + concentrated insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in patients with patellar tendinosis.
Meniscal injuries are a common pathology among athletes, and have an impact on the daily or sporting practice of patients. Surgical approach implies sometimes heavy consequences. Platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) has been shown to be effective in accelerating wound healing and tissue regeneration in orthopedic and oral surgery. This clinical trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of intraarticular and periferal PRP injection in patients with stable meniscal injury. The pre- and post-interventional clinical outcomes will be compared.
The investigators will explore a standardized and previously published evidence-based conservative multimodal physiotherapy treatment fulfilling clinical practice guidelines in individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) with facet-mediated pain (appropriate response to dual medial branch blocks) undergoing cervical facet joint Plasma-Rich Platelet (PRPt) and compare health outcomes to individuals' undergoing cervical facet joint PRP with usual care (PRPu), which consists of advice, supervised home exercise and pharmacological management for treatment of residual pain. To be clear, the investigators are not investigating the efficacy or effectiveness of cervical facet joint PRP - these individuals have already consented to proceed with PRP treatment. The investigators are evaluating the role of adjuvant conservative multimodal physiotherapy treatment. It must be noted that these patients have previously failed to respond to conservative physiotherapy. The investigators will use a design which is quite novel in physiotherapy, Single Case Experimental Designs (SCEDs). In contrast to an experimental group design in which one group is compared with another, participants in single-subject research provide their own control data for the purpose of comparison in a within-subject rather than a between-subjects design. SCEDs provide a method to determine response and benefit for every individual patient. Therefore, the investigators will assess effectiveness of conservative multimodal physiotherapy for chronic WAD with facet-mediated pain undergoing cervical facet joint PRP, using patients as their own control, in a multiple baseline design.
Efficacy and Antimicrobial activity of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Acne Vulgaris : A randomized controlled trial