Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This was a randomized controlled trial comparing child welfare business as usual (BAU) with two levels of supportive housing (SH). To identify eligible families, a screening tool was developed that helped social workers apply a "housing lens" very early in family child welfare involvement. The study examined the extent to which implementation was faithful to the model and how well state and community partners collaborated. The research included a process evaluation, outcomes study, and economic analysis. Access to either intervention group was associated with higher family preservation and reunification, with service model intensity demonstrating minimal impact. An economic evaluation revealed that the intensive model cost the most, but the existing SH program and routine care incurred equivalent per-child costs.


Clinical Trial Description

Supportive Housing for Families is a care management program that serves families who are experiencing child welfare needs (risk of losing custody of children or difficulty regaining custody of children) and severe housing needs. The program has been in operation for over 10 years and has been demonstrating positive outcomes for clients in terms of housing stability and family environment outcomes. A federally funded, five-year demonstration project and evaluation focused on a new and enhanced version of the program, the Intensive Supportive Housing for Families program (ISHF). Through a three arm randomized controlled trial, this study compared clients in three groups: parents who are randomly assigned to (1) enroll in ISHF, (2) participate in the existing Supportive Housing for Families (SHF) program, and (3) receive Child Welfare Business as Usual Services. This was the first randomized evaluation of this program, and the grant required examination of whether those who participate in an enhanced version of the program, which incorporates prompt access to evidence-based interventions, vocational services, and trauma services, show superior outcomes than clients randomized to the existing program. Further, clients in both of these conditions (SHF and ISHF) were compared to those receiving child welfare services in Connecticut as usual (BAU) without a supportive housing intervention. This research has three components: a) a process evaluation, b) a cost/economic analysis, and c) an impact analysis. The process evaluation and cost analysis were previously completed while the project was ongoing. Now that the project has ended, the final report on all project activities has been submitted to the funder, the Administration for Children and Families. This impact analysis addressed the following primary research questions: 1. Do clients who receive supportive housing services (SHF and ISHF interventions combined) demonstrate improved child welfare outcomes compared to those in the Child Welfare (DCF) Business as Usual (BAU) intervention? 2. Do clients who receive any supportive housing services (those in the SHF and ISHF interventions combined) demonstrate improved parental well-being compared to those in the Child Welfare (DCF) Business as Usual (BAU) intervention? 3. Do clients who receive supportive housing services (SHF and ISHF interventions combined) demonstrate improved parenting skills compared to those in the BAU intervention? 4. Do clients who receive any supportive housing services (those in the SHF and ISHF interventions combined) demonstrate increased self-sufficiency compared to those in the BAU intervention? 5. Do clients who receive any supportive housing services (those in the SHF and ISHF interventions combined) demonstrate improved child development compared to those in the Child Welfare Business as Usual intervention? 6. Do clients who receive any supportive housing services (those in the SHF and ISHF interventions combined) demonstrate improved child well-being compared to those in the Child Welfare Business as Usual intervention? A set of secondary research questions ask: across each of these outcomes (i.e., child welfare, parental well-being, parenting skills, self-sufficiency, child development, child well-being), are there differential effects across the three intervention options, ISHF, SHF, and BAU [such that those in ISHF show greater improvement than clients in the SHF program who show greater improvement than those in BAU]? Main outcome measures were assessed at 12, 18, and 24 months post-randomization. Housing outcomes included shelter stay and subsidy deployment. Child welfare outcomes included child removal and reunification, subsequent allegations and substantiations, and case closure. Results: Access to either intervention group was associated with higher family preservation and reunification, with service model intensity demonstrating minimal impact. An economic evaluation revealed that the intensive model cost the most, but the existing SH program and routine care incurred equivalent per-child costs. The PI of this research was originally at the University of Connecticut and moved to Chapin Hall. The research has concluded and the investigators are drafting a manuscript. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04596176
Study type Interventional
Source Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date November 1, 2013
Completion date December 31, 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06267534 - Mindfulness-based Mobile Applications Program N/A
Completed NCT04108689 - Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Training for Elite Ice Hockey Players N/A
Recruiting NCT06012084 - The Development and Evaluation of iCF-PWR for Healthy Siblings of Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis N/A
Completed NCT04085861 - Mental Health in Dancers; an Intervention Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05227352 - Bio-Experiential Spaces for Mental Health in Healthworkers N/A
Completed NCT03663075 - Effect of Group Education and Individual Counselling on Mental Health and Quality of Life in 45-60 Year Old Women N/A
Completed NCT02480907 - Supporting Carers of Children and Adolescents With Eating Disorders in Austria (SUCCEAT) N/A
Completed NCT02157766 - Wisconsin Center for the Neuroscience and Psychophysiology of Meditation N/A
Completed NCT01155687 - Psychosocial Counseling in Afghanistan N/A
Unknown status NCT01177696 - Intervention in Groups of Family Caregivers in Primary Health Care N/A
Completed NCT01037946 - Family to Family: Psychoeducation to Improve Children's Outcomes in HIV+ Families N/A
Completed NCT00700349 - Evaluation of Impacts of Access to Credit and Loan Size for Microcredit Clients in South Africa N/A
Recruiting NCT03885401 - Enhanced Care Planning for Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions N/A
Completed NCT03118388 - Engaging Homeless Youth in Vocational Training to Meet Their Mental Health Needs Phase 2
Completed NCT05061966 - The Digital Wellbeing Project N/A
Completed NCT04026308 - Written vs Electronic Safety Planning Study N/A
Completed NCT04546061 - Project Uplift: Substance Use and Mental Health Treatment for Young Sexual and Gender Minorities N/A
Completed NCT05738109 - Evaluating the Efficacy of a 91-day Self-talk Mental Health Self-care Journal N/A
Completed NCT03901274 - Partnering for Student Wellness N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05910580 - Improving Alcohol and Substance Use Care Access, Outcome, Equity During the Reproductive Years N/A