First-time Parents Physical Activity Intervention

Physical Activity Clinical Trial

Official title:

First-time Parents Physical Activity Intervention

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02290808
• Other study ID #: 133614
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: November 2014
• Est. completion date: July 2018

Study information

• Verified date: December 2020
• Source: University of Victoria
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will be investigating whether a theory-based physical activity intervention can maintain/improve moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity measured via accelerometry of new parents over the eight months of having a child compared to a control group of new parents. Hypothesis: The theory-based condition will change salient underlying motives (theory of planned behaviour constructs) for physical activity. Health-related fitness and quality of life will also be higher for this condition in comparison to the control condition. (Note: improvements in both groups of mothers may occur due to recovery from pregnancy, but our hypotheses will still hold). All outcomes will remain significantly higher at eight months in the theory-based condition compared to the standard condition

Description:

Clearly the prevention of chronic disease through physical activity promotion is an important research area. Identifying critical life transitions in people's physical activity behaviours may illuminate the most opportune intervention apertures for chronic disease prevention. A substantive evidence base now indicates that parenthood is one of these critical transition points for physical activity decline. Our proposed study will examine whether a brief, theory-based, and cost-effective intervention can help maintain/improve the physical activity behaviours of new parents in their first eight months of the parenthood experience. The study represents the first couple-based physical activity initiative in the parenthood literature; prior research has only focused on mothers and has shown short-term changes in physical activity that return to baseline levels after approximately one month. In light of the potential for couples to provide important sources of social support for the other parent within the household, it would seem remiss not to consider parenting interventions that are directed and evaluated at the dyadic level. Furthermore, couple-based interventions in other populations and other health behaviour domains have been shown as more effective than individual-level intervention. The long-term impact of this study, if the results support our hypotheses, has utility to prevent or curb the decline of physical activity habits based on our findings. This research has the clear potential to be applied to population-level knowledge translation sources such as prenatal classes, physician offices, and other early parent learning/counselling avenues. Parents will be measured at baseline (2 months post partum) with two assessment points at six weeks (3.5 months post partum) and three months (5 months post partum) and a final follow-up assessment six months later (8 months post partum). The content of the theory-based intervention was derived from the results of our prior CDA and SSHRC-funded longitudinal trial of new parents using the theory of planned behaviour to predict changes in physical activity, the content used in prior pilot-level studies that has already been successful in changing short-term physical activity in mothers 26-30, and the content of our current CIHR-funded study of physical activity goal planning. Primary Research Question 1) Does the theory-based condition improve adherence to regular physical activity among new parents when compared to those in the control condition at eight months after the birth of their first child? Hypothesis: Adherence will be higher for parents in the theory-based condition in comparison to parents in the control condition after controlling for possible confounds. The adherence effect may wane over time from the initial measurement period of two months after the onset of parenthood but all outcomes will remain significantly higher at eight months. Secondary Research Questions 1. Does the theory-based condition improve motivational, health-related quality of life, and health-related fitness outcomes among new parents when compared to those in the control condition at eight months after the onset of parenthood? Hypothesis: The theory-based condition will change salient underlying motives (theory of planned behaviour constructs) for physical activity because its basis is from the key results of our prior longitudinal trial of new parents. Health-related fitness and quality of life, will also be higher for this condition in comparison to the control condition, (footnote: improvements in both groups of mothers may occur due to recovery from pregnancy, but our hypotheses will still hold). All outcomes will remain significantly higher at eight months in the theory-based condition compared to the standard physical activity education group. 2. Can group differences among new parents with regard to these motivational, behavioural, and health-related fitness outcomes be explained through a mediation model? Hypothesis: The covariance of the assigned conditions (theory-based, standard) on adherence will be explained by changes in the salient underlying motives for physical activity (i.e., manipulation check). In turn, the covariance between these salient underlying motives and health-related outcomes will be explained by physical activity adherence among conditions. 3. Can motivational variables predict adherence? Do these differ by condition? Hypothesis: The approach will test Ajzen's 39 theory of planned behavior. Affective attitude and perceived behavioural control will predict intention, intention will predict adherence across conditions similar to our prior study with this population 41. 4. Is there a seasonal, initial physical activity status, mental health or gender difference across primary outcomes by assigned condition? Hypothesis: No differences in gender or season are hypothesized based on our lack of evidence in the prior trial41, but these are exploratory research questions because there is limited research at present to make any definitive statement. The examination of whether the intervention affects maintenance or increases in baseline physical activity via stratification of baseline values will also be explored as will the assessment of baseline depression and anxiety. Recruitment: We began feasibility recruitment and procedures last year in order to establish our protocol, and pilot our intervention material. Based on this feasibility study, participant recruitment is being achieved with both active (pregnancy class visits) and passive recruitment techniques (notice of research and poster). The active recruitment is being conducted through community organizations offering prenatal classes and programming for first-time parents. The project coordinator and research assistants associated with this project are the main point of contact for potential participants. Organizations are contacted by the research coordinator and asked if they are interested in giving 10 minutes of time (prenatal class, workshop).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 132
• Est. completion date: July 2018
• Est. primary completion date: March 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 40 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Married or common law couples
• Living in Greater Victoria
• Expecting first child
• 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

• younger than 18
• Expecting second or third child

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Physical Activity

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Theory-based group
Workbooks and mini-counselling sessions will be provided to participants in this group.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	University of Victoria	Victoria	British Columbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Victoria

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (49)

Atkins DC. Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: basic and advanced issues. J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):98-110. Review. — View Citation

Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):266-97. Review. Erratum in: Am J Prev Med 1999 Jul;17(1):98. — View Citation

Bellows-Riecken KH, Rhodes RE. A birth of inactivity? A review of physical activity and parenthood. Prev Med. 2008 Feb;46(2):99-110. Epub 2007 Aug 15. Review. — View Citation

Black DR, Gleser LJ, Kooyers KJ. A meta-analytic evaluation of couples weight-loss programs. Health Psychol. 1990;9(3):330-47. — View Citation

Brown SG, Rhodes RE. Relationships among dog ownership and leisure-time walking in Western Canadian adults. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2):131-6. — View Citation

Burke V, Giangiulio N, Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S, Milligan RA. Health promotion in couples adapting to a shared lifestyle. Health Educ Res. 1999 Apr;14(2):269-88. — View Citation

Burke V, Giangiulio N, Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S. Physical activity and nutrition programs for couples: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):421-32. — View Citation

Casiro NS, Rhodes RE, Naylor PJ, McKay HA. Correlates of intergenerational and personal physical activity of parents. Am J Health Behav. 2011 Jan-Feb;35(1):81-91. — View Citation

Charlesworth S, Foulds HJ, Burr JF, Bredin SS. Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: pregnancy. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S33-48. doi: 10.1139/h11-061. Review. — View Citation

Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011 Mar;22(1):7-14. — View Citation

Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011 Mar;22(1):15-23. — View Citation

Craig CL, Russell SJ, Cameron C, Bauman A. Twenty-year trends in physical activity among Canadian adults. Can J Public Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;95(1):59-63. — View Citation

Craig S, Goldberg J, Dietz WH. Psychosocial correlates of physical activity among fifth and eighth graders. Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;25(5):506-13. — View Citation

Cramp AG, Brawley LR. Moms in motion: a group-mediated cognitive-behavioral physical activity intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 Aug 22;3:23. — View Citation

Downs DS, Hausenblas HA. Exercising for two: examining pregnant women's second trimester exercise intention and behavior using the framework of the theory of planned behavior. Womens Health Issues. 2003 Nov-Dec;13(6):222-8. — View Citation

Dumas JE, Lynch AM, Laughlin JE, Phillips Smith E, Prinz RJ. Promoting intervention fidelity. Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1 Suppl):38-47. — View Citation

Dzator JA, Hendrie D, Burke V, Gianguilio N, Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S. A randomized trial of interactive group sessions achieved greater improvements in nutrition and physical activity at a tiny increase in cost. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;57(6):610-9. — View Citation

Fahrenwald NL, Atwood JR, Walker SN, Johnson DR, Berg K. A randomized pilot test of "Moms on the Move": a physical activity intervention for WIC mothers. Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):82-90. — View Citation

Fjeldsoe BS, Miller YD, Marshall AL. MobileMums: a randomized controlled trial of an SMS-based physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med. 2010 May;39(2):101-11. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9170-z. — View Citation

Gainforth HL, Berry T, Faulkner G, Rhodes RE, Spence JC, Tremblay MS, Latimer-Cheung AE. Evaluating the uptake of Canada's new physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines on service organizations' websites. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Jun;3(2):172-9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0190-z. — View Citation

Godin G, Jobin J, Bouillon J. Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study. Can J Public Health. 1986 Sep-Oct;77(5):359-62. — View Citation

Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6. — View Citation

Hamilton K, White KM. Identifying key belief-based targets for promoting regular physical activity among mothers and fathers with young children. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Mar;14(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Aug 30. — View Citation

Hausenblas H, Downs DS, Giacobbi P, Tuccitto D, Cook B. A multilevel examination of exercise intention and behavior during pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Mar 26. — View Citation

Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):81-91. — View Citation

Janz KF. Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Mar;26(3):369-75. — View Citation

King AC, Stokols D, Talen E, Brassington GS, Killingsworth R. Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity: forging a transdisciplinary paradigm. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Aug;23(2 Suppl):15-25. — View Citation

Lee RG, Garvin T. Moving from information transfer to information exchange in health and health care. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):449-64. Review. — View Citation

Mailey EL, McAuley E. Impact of a brief intervention on physical activity and social cognitive determinants among working mothers: a randomized trial. J Behav Med. 2014 Apr;37(2):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9492-y. Epub 2013 Jan 22. — View Citation

McIntyre CA, Rhodes RE. Correlates of leisure-time physical activity during transitions to motherhood. Women Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;49(1):66-83. doi: 10.1080/03630240802690853. — View Citation

Miller YD, Trost SG, Brown WJ. Mediators of physical activity behavior change among women with young children. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Aug;23(2 Suppl):98-103. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Blanchard CM, Benoit C, Levy-Milne R, Naylor PJ, Symons Downs D, Warburton DE. Physical activity and sedentary behavior across 12 months in cohort samples of couples without children, expecting their first child, and expecting their second child. J Behav Med. 2014 Jun;37(3):533-42. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9508-7. Epub 2013 Apr 19. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Blanchard CM, Benoit C, Levy-Milne R, Naylor PJ, Symons Downs D, Warburton DE. Social cognitive correlates of physical activity across 12 months in cohort samples of couples without children, expecting their first child, and expecting their second child. Health Psychol. 2014 Aug;33(8):792-802. doi: 10.1037/a0033755. Epub 2013 Aug 5. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Murray H, Temple VA, Tuokko H, Higgins JW. Pilot study of a dog walking randomized intervention: effects of a focus on canine exercise. Prev Med. 2012 May;54(5):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Mar 1. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Naylor PJ, McKay HA. Pilot study of a family physical activity planning intervention among parents and their children. J Behav Med. 2010 Apr;33(2):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9237-0. Epub 2009 Nov 24. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Pfaeffli LA. Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-37. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Plotnikoff RC. Can current physical activity act as a reasonable proxy measure of future physical activity? Evaluating cross-sectional and passive prospective designs with the use of social cognition models. Prev Med. 2005 May;40(5):547-55. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Temple VA, Tuokko HA. Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: cognitive and psychological conditions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S113-53. doi: 10.1139/h11-041. Review. — View Citation

Rhodes RE, Warburton DE, Bredin SS. Predicting the effect of interactive video bikes on exercise adherence: An efficacy trial. Psychol Health Med. 2009 Dec;14(6):631-40. doi: 10.1080/13548500903281088. — View Citation

Strath SJ, Brage S, Ekelund U. Integration of physiological and accelerometer data to improve physical activity assessment. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S563-71. — View Citation

Travers KD. The social organization of nutritional inequities. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Aug;43(4):543-53. — View Citation

Walker LO. Weight gain after childbirth: a women's health concern? Ann Behav Med. 1995 Spring;17(2):132-41. — View Citation

Walker LO. Weight-related distress in the early months after childbirth. West J Nurs Res. 1998 Feb;20(1):30-44. — View Citation

Warburton DE, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, Nettlefold L, Bredin SS. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:39. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-39. — View Citation

Warburton DE, Katzmarzyk PT, Rhodes RE, Shephard RJ. Evidence-informed physical activity guidelines for Canadian adults. Can J Public Health. 2007;98 Suppl 2:S16-68. Review. — View Citation

Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9. Review. — View Citation

Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Prescribing exercise as preventive therapy. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 28;174(7):961-74. Review. Erratum in: CMAJ. 2008 Mar 11;178(6):731-2. — View Citation

Webb TL, Sheeran P. Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;47(Pt 3):373-95. Epub 2007 Dec 18. — View Citation

Welk GJ. Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S501-11. — View Citation

* Note: There are 49 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Objective and Self-report Physical activity	Physical activity will be measured objectively for 7 consecutive days using the wGT3X-BT Activity Monitor combined with self-report of PA using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (LSI) at each time period.	Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, and 6 months
Secondary	Demographic information	Basic information on gender, age, ethnicity, income, education level will be gathered.	Baseline
Secondary	Health measures	Information on leave status, child care status, diet, sleep (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) and breastfeeding status, smoking, alcohol consumption will be included in this assessment.	Baseline and 6 months
Secondary	Motivation for physical activity	Motivation will be measured using the constructs of the theory of planned behaviour. Items will measure all components of the model (affective attitude, instrumental attitude, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, perceived control, planning) including behavioural, normative, and control beliefs.	Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, 6 months
Secondary	Health related quality of life/psychosocial distress	This will be assessed with parents using the Satisfaction with Life Scale. In addition, we will assess depressive and anxiety symptoms with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which also has sound reliability and validity compared to similar instruments.	Baseline, 6 weeks, 3.5 months, 6 months
Secondary	Health related fitness	We will assess the key components of health-related physical fitness including body composition, aerobic fitness and musculoskeletal fitness which are valid for males and females.	Baseline and 6 months