View clinical trials related to Phrenic Nerve Paralysis.
Filter by:The suprascapular nerve, originating from the C5 trunk, provides innervation to the acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joints. The supraclavicular nerve, a branch of the cervical plexus, contributes to the sensory innervation of the upper deltoid region. Cervical and brachial plexus blocks can cause diaphragm paralysis. This study examined the effects of low-volume combined anterior suprascapular nerve block and superficial cervical plexus block on pain and phrenic nerve in participants underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery.
The purpose of this study to assess the diaphragm kinetics with Tissue Doppler Imaging in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation with cryoballoon
Brachial plexus blocks used for anesthesia in upper extremity operations can be performed with interscalene, axillary, supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches. Plexus blockage can be performed under the guidance of needle nerve stimulation, artery palpation or ultrasonography (USG). Nowadays, the simultaneous use of USG during the block allows the protection of structures such as nerves, pleura and vessels, and allows practitioners to see the needle and the spread of local anesthetic during the injection. Although supraclavicular block seems to be advantageous because the brachial plexus is more compact and superficial in this region, it has a disadvantage of being close to the pleura. (Increased risk of pneumothorax) With the use of USG, this risk has decreased and the supraclavicular block has become an alternative to infraclavicular block, which is widely used in upper extremity surgery. Due to the compact structure of the brachial plexus trunk at the first rib level, the application of the block is easier and the block formation is faster due to the peripheral spread of the local anesthetic. With the spread of local anesthetic to C3-C5 nerve roots in the brachial plexus, paralysis can be seen in the ipsilateral phrenic nerve up to 67%. Patients who will be operated on, especially in patients with respiratory distress, may experience respiratory distress due to the dysfunction of that side diaphragm muscle. With the help of ultrasound, the inspiratory and end-expiratory thickness of the diaphragm is measured with the Diaphragm Thickness Index (DTI), which is a new and effective method used as a mechanical ventilator weaning index in intensive care units. With this method, we can examine the effect of phrenic nerve block on diaphragm muscle due to local anesthesia in the acute period. DTI is calculated as a percentage from the following formula: (Max thickness at the end of inspiration - Max thickness at the end of the expiration) / Max thickness at the end of the expiration. By comparing 3 different approaches used in supraclavicular block, we aimed to investigate the most appropriate block approach in terms of effectiveness, speed, complication rate, effects on diaphragm and 6 months effects.
This study aims to measure diaphragmatic dysfunction with ultrasonography and nerve stimulation of the phrenicus nerve, in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for lung and esophageal cancer, and correlate measures of diaphramatic function to clinical postoperative endpoints.
Interscalene brachial plexus block is known as the gold standard for analgesia after shoulder surgery, but limits the use of ipsilateral phrenic nerve paralysis. Recently, interest in potential diaphragm-sparing alternative blocks has increased for patients undergoing shoulder surgery.Two of these blocks are upper trunk block (UTB) and costoclavicular brachial plexus (CCBPB) block. This randomized controlled trial will compare ultrasound-guided UTB and CCBPB in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The main outcome is pain intensity score at 30 minutes after arrival in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) as measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. The investigators research hypothesis is that UTB and CCBPB will result in equivalent postoperative analgesia at 30 minutes in the PACU.
The goal of this study is the evaluation of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks as an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus nerve blocks for rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Currently, single shot interscalene nerve blocks are performed for rotator cuff repair surgeries, and interscalene nerve catheters are placed for total shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. Erector spinae plane blocks are commonly used as part of the anesthetic plan for other surgeries, but less so for shoulder surgeries. The investigators would like to study whether an ESP block can provide similar pain control compared to an interscalene nerve block, with less risk of upper extremity motor block and phrenic nerve block.
One of the most frequently performed peripheral nerve blocks (the injection of local anesthetic near nerves to block sensation/ movement to a specific part of the body) is the interscalene brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgeries. This type of block can unmask underlying respiratory issues such as shortness of breath due to a well-known and typically insignificant side effect of temporary diaphragmatic paralysis. The nerve block may be able to use saline solution to wash out the local anesthetic and potentially reverse this respiratory side effect. Specifically, the goal of this study is to determine if the injection of saline through the nerve block catheter reverses blockade of the phrenic nerve supplying the diaphragm, without affecting the ability of the nerve block to provide pain control after surgery.
Putting 80 patients divided into group S（non-intubated general anesthesia combine with Paravertebral blocks、surface spray anesthesia and Vagus block） and group D（non-intubated general anesthesia combine with Paravertebral blocks、surface spray anesthesia、Vagus block and Phrenic block）randomly,compare the volume of anesthetic and the number of increasing anesthetic during operation were compared between the two groups.If the date of group S greater than group D，it shows that the effect of anesthetic effect of group D is better than group S.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the movement of the diaphragm after an interscalene block with liposome bupivacaine (LB) compared to interscalene block (IB) with bupivacaine. This study will evaluate if there is a possible prolonged phrenic nerve paralysis when using liposome bupivacaine in an interscalene block, using ultrasound.
The investigator will compare Costoclavicular approach of infraclavicular block and supraclavicular block. Especially, the incidence of phrenic nerve palsy and the quality of block.