View clinical trials related to Phantom Limb Pain.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) when performing sympathetic block for upper limb pain control.
Phantom and residual limb pain are types of peripheral neuropathic pain that are difficult to treat and where the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex is an increasingly studied technique for the treatment of neuropathic pain and has shown modest effects in pain intensity reduction for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Newer rTMS coils provide the opportunity to stimulate larger brain areas, which could provide a better treatment option compared to conventional coils. The aims of this study are to investigate whether the peripheral nervous system is a necessary driver of phantom limb pain and/or residual limb pain in patients with lower limb amputation using spinal anaesthesia, and to assess the analgesic efficacy of deep H-coil rTMS compared to sham stimulation in the same patients.
Neuropathic pain is common in limb amputees and causes reductions in activity and participation as well as impaired quality of life. Some of these pains lead to the diagnosis of a responsible lesion and to precise and effective treatments (amputation neuroma pains, for example), whether they are etiological or symptomatic. Other pains of a neuropathic character remain totally or partially resistant to symptomatic treatment. Their appearance, intensity, duration and frequency vary depending on the amputee. Old scientific data confirmed by modern imagery indicates a process of reorganization of cortical areas by multimodal afferents. This reconstruction, coherent or not of the body diagram, is at the genesis of sensations, normal or not, in the amputee. Early plurimodal reassignment constitutes the founding principle of the rehabilitation of amputees: tactile afferents, visual afferents, motor afferents, proprioceptive afferents. Rehabilitation techniques and early fitting contribute to this reafferentation and to the functional integration of the fitting and to the quality of life of the amputee. Scientific work by Katz et al, and experiences of amputees relieved by the application of local heat or stay in hot climatic zones show that the thermoregulation of the residual limb could be of interest. It has been shown that these pain conditions are often related to a reduction in superficial blood flow to the distal part of the stump. The physiological response of the body to variations in outside temperature physiologically consists in the regulation of skin temperature. The goal seems to keep the body in a so-called "thermal neutrality" zone, substantially between 30 ° C and 33 ° C, by vasodilation or vasoconstriction of the superficial blood vessels depending on exposure to cold or heat. An innovative medical device has been developed for a regulated thermal re-afferentation of the residual limb, during and outside the wearing of the prosthesis. The Connected Caloprosthesis Kit (CCK®) includes a connected sleeve put in place when wearing the prosthesis (interface between the skin and the socket) and a connected sock to put in place outside of wearing the prosthesis. These 2 devices include an autonomous heating and regulation process, which maintains the amputation stump in the area known as "skin thermal normality". This device is non-invasive. It includes a silicone sleeve and a heating sock for femoral or tibial amputee patients equipped with an expandable textile warmer, a flexible micro-temperature sensor and a 4-conductor extensible cable connected to a thermoregulation box worn as a belt which regulates the temperature of the stumps in the thermal neutrality zone between 30 and 33°C. In order to assess the therapeutic effect of CCK®, given the heterogeneity of the population and the small number of patients eligible for the study, the Single Case Experimental Design (multiple baselines design) seems to us to be the methodology the most suitable: the principle is to evaluate intensively and prospectively a small group of subjects, each case being its own comparator. The methodology is defined a priori including systematic observations and repeated measurements at a defined frequency before, during, or even after the intervention introduced in a sequential and randomized manner. The data analysis can be individual and therefore patient-specific, but also group with the calculation of the size of the therapeutic effect and the calculation of significance. This design therefore makes it possible to overcome the difficulties encountered during randomized controlled trials: having to have a large number of subjects necessary to show a significant difference in the medical device and to have a homogeneous population. This methodology is therefore not a description of a clinical case but an alternative methodology to randomized controlled trials. In fact, it is considered by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 to be level I, like the randomized controlled trials. The proposed clinical study therefore has a dual objective: practical as a new treatment therapy by validating this medical device and theoretical, supporting the pathogenic model of painful sensations in amputees
This study will examine whether a form of non-invasive brain stimulation can help reduce pain in people with persistent neuropathic pain.
The goals of this study are to provide sensory information to amputees and reduce phantom limb pain via electrical stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord and spinal nerves. The spinal nerves convey sensory information from peripheral nerves to higher order centers in the brain. These structures still remain intact after amputation and electrical stimulation of the dorsal spinal nerves in individuals with intact limbs and amputees has been demonstrated to generate paresthetic sensory percepts referred to portions of the distal limb. Further, there is recent evidence that careful modulation of stimulation parameters can convert paresthetic sensations to more naturalistic ones when stimulating peripheral nerves in amputees. However, it is currently unclear whether it is possible to achieve this same conversion when stimulating the spinal nerves, and if those naturalistic sensations can have positive effects on phantom limb pain. As a first step towards those goals, in this study, the investigators will quantify the sensations generated by electrical stimulation of the spinal nerves, study the relationship between stimulation parameters and the quality of those sensations, measure changes in control of a prosthesis with sensory stimulation, and quantify the effects of that stimulation on the perception of the phantom limb and any associated pain.
The goal of this study is to investigate the role of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spinal cord excitability in lower limb amputees. In this study, the investigators will quantify the spinal cord excitability determined by 1) reflexes and electromyography, and 2) phantom limb pain using self-reported pain assessments. The investigators will assess these measures of spinal excitability in lower limb amputees before and after transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
To assess changes in pain, physical function, and health-related quality of life in patients with post-amputation neuroma-associated residual limb pain after cooled radiofrequency ablation.
The primary goals of this pilot research project are a) to design and develop the a mixed reality based system for managing phantom pain and b) to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary functional outcomes of this system in a sample of patients with lower limb amputation. Findings from this pilot study will serve as preliminary data to inform regarding a fully powered clinical trial to determine the effectiveness and practical implementation of these findings in real-world settings. Aim1: Design and develop a feasible mixed reality based system to manage phantom pain in patients with lower limb amputation qualifying for on-going mirror therapy. Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that the mixed reality based system to manage phantom pain will be feasible and well-received by a sample of patients with lower limb amputation needing mirror therapy. Aim2: Evaluate functional outcomes in a sample of lower limb amputees (n=10), using this mixed reality based system to manage phantom pain. Hypothesis 2: Using this system, the investigators hypothesize that patients who participate in the mixed reality based system will show improvements in functional mobility based on performance evaluations and patient reported outcome measures (PROs). The investigators also hypothesize that this mixed reality based system will help to alleviate the phantom pain based on McGill Pain questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS).
Amputees often suffer from relentless pain and disability resulting from symptomatic neuromas within the amputation stumps. When conservative measures fail to address these symptoms, two contemporary surgical approaches to treat symptomatic neuromas have become the most popular. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a procedure which involves transferring the injured proximal nerve stump into a terminal nerve branch entering muscle, such that the axons from the proximal nerve stump will regenerate into the muscle and thereby prevent neuroma recurrence. Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) are muscle grafts placed on the proximal nerve stumps that serve as targets for the regenerating axons from the proximal nerve stumps. While TMR and RPNIs have demonstrated promise for the treatment of symptomatic neuromas, prospective comparative data comparing outcomes with these two approaches is lacking. The investigators have recently developed a novel approach to treat symptomatic neuromas that provides vascularized, denervated muscle targets (VDMTs) for the axons regenerating from the severed proximal nerve stump to reinnervate. This is accomplished by islandizing a segment of muscle on its blood supply and ensuring complete denervation prior to implanting the neighboring transected nerve stump into this muscle. VDMTs offer theoretical benefits in comparison to RPNIs and TMR that the investigators also aim to test in the proposed study. The investigators' objective is to enroll amputees with symptomatic neuromas into a prospective study in which amputees will be randomized to undergo TMR, RPNI, or VDMT and subsequently monitored for pain and disability for 1-year post-operatively. The investigators' specific aims are as follows: 1) Test the hypothesis that VDMTs are more effective than TMR and RPNIs with regards to treating pain and disability associated with symptomatic neuromas; 2) Provide the first level one, prospective data directly comparing the efficacy of TMR and RPNIs.
86-87% of people who have had an amputation still feel pain in the limb that has been amputated - Phantom limb pain (PLP). Sensory retraining is a form of treatment for PLP where a special form of electrical stimulation is delivered to the residual limb. The theory is that this stimulation changes activity in the brain that helps to reduce the person's pain. Two new types of sensory retraining device for the treatment of phantom limb pain have been developed. One type requires the user to interact with the device while the other is a non-interactive device. Both devices are new so it is unknown as to how well they may work, or which is best, therefore both will be tested in this study. This study will be undertaken remotely, using video call, telephone and email for communication. The study will compare the effect of both devices for efficacy. One hundred people with PLP will be recruited from the NHS and the general public and randomised to receive either the interactive or non-interactive device or their placebo equivalents. A health care professional will train the research participants how to use their device. Participants will then use their device at home for 3 weeks. To ensure that they are using their devices as required, the researchers will keep in contact throughout the three week treatment period, using a schedule of video calls, weekly phone calls and daily texts. Pain and function will be measured before treatment, after treatment and at a 3 month follow-up. Twelve participants will also be invited to a one-to-one interview to give their experience of the acceptability and usability of their device.