Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trial
— RATE-AFOfficial title:
Evaluating Different Rate Control Therapies in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Randomised, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint Feasibility Pilot Comparing Digoxin and Beta-blockers as Initial Rate Control Therapy
Verified date | June 2021 |
Source | University of Birmingham |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Atrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm disturbance, causing important discomfort for patients, a high risk of stroke, frequent hospital admissions and a two-fold increase in death. The number of patients with this condition are expected to double in the next 20 years. Medications to control heart-rate are used in the majority of patients, although the choice of agent is often guided by local preference rather than evidence from controlled trials. Despite the fact that patients with atrial fibrillation have high rates of other cardiac conditions such as heart failure, clinicians have insufficient evidence to personalise the use of different therapies. This feasibility study will allow us to develop a range of methods that can characterise patients according to the pumping and relaxing function of the heart, the burden of symptoms and to identify new blood markers. In this way, the investigators hope to improve clinical practice guidelines, allowing doctors to prescribe appropriate treatments for the right patients. The research will be focused around a randomised trial of two medication strategies, providing much-needed data on the comparison of digoxin and beta-blockers (two commonly-used drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation). It will also allow us to identify the best way to record patient-reported quality of life and develop robust techniques to determine heart function using non-invasive imaging, facilitating the conduct of a large-scale clinical trial. The key objectives of the research programme are to define the optimal medications for patients with atrial fibrillation and identify the most valid, reproducible and cost-effective methods to examine patients. The ultimate aim of the project is to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation, benefiting patients, the National Health Service and the global community.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 161 |
Est. completion date | September 16, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | April 15, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 60 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult patients aged 60 years or older, able to provide informed written consent 2. Permanent AF, characterised (at time of randomisation) as a physician decision for rate-control with no plans for cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic medication, or ablation therapy 3. Symptoms of breathlessness (New York Heart Association Class II or more) 4. Able to provide written, informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Established indication for beta-blocker therapy, e.g. survived myocardial infarction in the last 6 months 2. Known contraindications for therapy with beta-blockers or digoxin, e.g. a history of severe bronchospasm that would preclude use of beta-blockers, or known intolerance to these medications 3. Baseline heart rate <60 bpm 4. Known intolerance of beta-blockers or digoxin 5. A history of severe bronchospasm (e.g. due to asthma) that would preclude use of beta-blockers 6. Baseline heart rate <60 bpm 7. History of second or third-degree heart block 8. Supraventricular arrhythmias associated with accessory conducting pathways (e.g. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation 9. Planned pacemaker implantation, pacemaker-dependent rhythm or history of atrioventricular node ablation 10. Decompensated heart failure (evidenced by need for intravenous inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 14 days prior to randomisation 11. A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis 12. Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation 13. Initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (with/without defibrillator) within 6 months prior to randomisation 14. Intravenous infusions for heart failure (inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 7 days prior to randomisation 15. A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis 16. Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation 17. Receiving renal replacement therapy 18. Major surgery, including thoracic or cardiac surgery, within 3 months of randomisation 19. Severe, concomitant non-cardiovascular disease (including malignancy) that is expected to reduce life expectancy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | City Hospital | Birmingham | West Midlands |
United Kingdom | Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Birmingham | West Midlands |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Birmingham |
United Kingdom,
Kotecha D, Holmes J, Krum H, Altman DG, Manzano L, Cleland JG, Lip GY, Coats AJ, Andersson B, Kirchhof P, von Lueder TG, Wedel H, Rosano G, Shibata MC, Rigby A, Flather MD; Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group. Efficacy of ß blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2235-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61373-8. Epub 2014 Sep 2. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Cardiovascular Events | Number of Participants with hospital admissions for cardiovascular events. | 12 months | |
Other | Drug Discontinuation Rate | the number and extent to which patients discontinue trial drugs | 12 months | |
Other | Drug Discontinuation Rate Within 12 Months. | Number of participants requiring drug discontinuation due to adverse reactions. | 12 months | |
Other | Hospital Admission Rate | A composite of adverse clinical events | 12 months | |
Other | Retention of Participants | Convenience, compliance and cross-over data | 12 months | |
Other | Preferred Outcome Measures for This Cohort of Patients | Establish which are the best measures for these patients | 12 months | |
Other | Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions. | SF-36 physical function score at 6 and 12 months | 12 months | |
Other | Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions. | SF-36 overall score at 6 and 12 months | 12 months | |
Other | Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions. | AFEQT overall score at 6 and 12 months | 12 months | |
Other | Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions. | LVEF and E/e scores at 6 and 12 months | 12 months | |
Other | Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Admissions. | Number of Participants with Unplanned Hospital Admissions. | During the 12 month follow-up period. | |
Primary | Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36) | Patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire physical component score.
The physical component score ranges from 0-100 where higher value indicates better outcome. |
Primary outcome at 6 months timepoint. | |
Secondary | Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction | The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices | 12 months | |
Secondary | Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'. | The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices.
E/e' - the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity. |
12 months | |
Secondary | B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months. | B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 6 months. | 6 months | |
Secondary | Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months. | Composite functional status measures- 6 minute walking distance at 12 months. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months. | As assessed using the AFEQT overall score at 12 months. The range for AFEQT overall score is from 0= complete disability to 100=no disability. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months. | As assessed using the SF-36 version 2 global and specific scores at 12 months. All domains presented are between 0 to 100 scale where the higher score indicates better outcomes. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L) | As assessed using the EQ-5D-5L summary index questionnaires at both 6 and 12 months.
The range for summary index is from -0.594=worst score to 1=best score |
12 months | |
Secondary | Ambulatory Heart-rate. | 24 hour ambulatory heart-rate. | Within 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02137187 -
Atrioventricular Junction Ablation and Biventricular Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02161965 -
Vascular CalcIfiCation and sTiffness Induced by ORal antIcoAgulation
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06377046 -
Accelerated Pacing in Patients Undergoing Pace-and-ablate Strategy With LBBAP: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05549544 -
Clinical Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00246805 -
Heart Rate Regularization in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Post Marketing Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02695992 -
Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation II
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01765075 -
Signal Transfer of Atrial Fibrillation Data to Guide Human Treatment
|
N/A |