View clinical trials related to Peritonitis.
Filter by:Hypothesis: Intraperitoneal tPA and DNase is well tolerated at a number of different doses. Different doses of tPA and DNase will have a dose-related effect on inflammatory markers (CRP and intraperitoneal white cell count). Aims: 1. To examine the tolerability of different doses of intraperitoneal tPA and DNase compared to standard treatment. 2. To examine the changes in biochemical and clinical outcomes of PD Peritonitis with the addition of intraperitoneal tPA and DNase to usual therapy.
The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) in predicting patient outcomes with suspected peritonitis in the Intensive Care Unit after abdominal surgery and compare PPS with other blood parameters, including C-Reactive Protein (CRP), White Cell Count (WCC), Interleucin-6 (IL-6) and Procalcitonin (PCT).
This observational retrospective healthcare medical record review study is to evaluate and differentiate the clinical characteristics and outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with either endotoxin-associated sterile peritonitis (e-SP), bacterial peritonitis (BP) or no peritonitis (NoP) over a 12-15 month period from dialysis clinics in The Netherlands, Germany, Hungary, Portugal, and the United Kingdom (UK). The primary study objectives are to: - Describe changes in the peritoneal membrane function and clinical outcomes over time between e-SP, BP and NoP PD patients. - Describe and differentiate clinical characteristics during the acute clinical presentation of e-SP and BP. The secondary study objective is to: - Generate a dataset that will facilitate post hoc exploratory hypothesis-generation related to clinical and resource utilisation (RU) outcomes in association with e-SP.
Nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is frequently caused by multi drug resistant bacteria. Standard treatment of SBP could be ineffective. The aim of the study is to compare daptomycin + meropenem vs ceftazidime in the treatment of nosocomial SBP.
The acute appendicitis (AA) is a very common disease with a life time risk 7-8% and the highest incidence in the second decades . The aetiology of AA is still poor understood: the commonest hypothesis refers to appendix obstruction followed by impairment of wall appendix barrier and thus wall perforation and/or abscess formation1. However some studies suggest that no-complicate and complicate appendicitis are different entities allowing a different treatment. The study aims to test the no inferiority in terms of efficacy of antibiotic treatment compared to surgery in a population with high probability to suffer of 1st episode of AA.The study aims to test the no inferiority in terms of efficacy of antibiotic treatment compared to surgery in a population with high probability to suffer of 1st episode of AA.
This is a control matched prospective study evaluating the use of seromuscular flap for high risk anastomoses.
Patients with cirrhosis present an increased susceptibility to bacterial infections. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the most frequent infection and induces severe circulatory dysfunction associated with renal failure in about 30% of cases. Renal failure is a reliable surrogate marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with SBP or with non-SBP infections. Albumin, as an adjuvant to antibiotherapy reduces significantly the rate of renal failure, in-hospital mortality, and overall mortality (Sort P, et al. NEJM 1999). However, little is known regarding the effect of albumin administration in patients with non-SBP infections. Two recent prospective studies demonstrated that non-SBP infections are associated with impairment of the effective circulating volume and precipitate renal failure whatever the presence of ascites. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of albumin, associated with appropriate antibiotic therapy, on occurrence or deterioration of renal failure and survival in septic (SIRS criteria required) cirrhotic patients with non-SBP infections and presenting with a Child-Pugh score > 8.
The first objective (LOLA) of this integrated trial is to determine whether laparoscopic lavage leads to better clinical outcomes compared to sigmoidectomy in patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis in terms of mortality and major morbidity. The second objective (DIVA) is to determine whether sigmoidectomy with anastomosis or sigmoidectomy with end-colostomy is the superior approach in patients with perforated diverticulitis with either purulent or faecal peritonitis in terms of stoma free survival. The study is designed as a multicenter and randomised trial.
The investigators purpose is to demonstrate that a short antibiotic therapy (8 days) for postoperative peritonitis brings an increased number of antibiotic-free days over a 28 days period when compared to conventional (15 days) treatment.
BACKGROUND: Peritonitis remains a significant problem in peritoneal dialysis. It is the leading cause of technique failure, and contributes to mortality. The incidence is highest during the first year of treatment. Non-compliance with the Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) protocol is shown to be an important risk factor for peritonitis. Reinforcement of knowledge and ability to perform PD therefore appears to be a possible way to reduce the incidence of peritonitis. This will be studied in The PEritonitis Prevention Study (PEPS). METHODS: The objective of this randomized, multi-centre investigation,which will include 750 new PD patients who can perform (PD) without assistance, is to evaluate if regular retraining can reduce the incidence of peritonitis, the technique-failure rate, and the hospitalisation days due to peritonitis compared with regular follow-up regimen. Patients in the intervention group will tested by a PD-technique test and a questionnaire at regular intervals after PD-start and after every peritonitis episode with focus on infection prophylaxis. If needed, they will be retrained. The control group will be treated according to the routine of the center. The study is ongoing in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, the Netherlands, and the UK. The study will go on for 6 years.