Clinical Trials Logo

Peritoneal Dialysis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Peritoneal Dialysis.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05646615 Active, not recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Experiences and Health-related Quality of Life of Informal Caregivers of Dialysis Patients

Start date: June 25, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The goal of this prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study is to assess the trajectory of the experiences (both positive and negative) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of informal caregivers of patients who start home dialysis, and compare these to experiences and HRQOL of informal caregivers of patients who start in-centre hemodialysis. The investigators hypothesise that informal caregivers of home dialysis patients experience more positive experiences, but also more negative experiences, and still have better HRQoL, compared with caregivers of in-centre HD patients. Participants will fill in five different validated questionnaires and questions on required support. Participants are asked to fill in the questionnaires after inclusion (i.e., start of dialysis), and at 6 and 12 months after start dialysis.

NCT ID: NCT04076930 Active, not recruiting - Peritoneal Dialysis Clinical Trials

Effects of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Start date: August 31, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Among antihypertensive medications, RAS inhibitor classes, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) have the most prospective data on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in specific high-risk populations with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). Whereas, long-term data on the risks and benefits of ACEI/ARB usage in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) are limited. Recently, increasing clinical studies suggested that ACEI/ARB had a beneficial effect on intermediate outcomes, including short-term blood pressure variability, left ventricular hypertrophy, and may have an important role in the peritoneum and the kidney protection. Subsequently, treatment with ACEI/ARB has been recommended by the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis for PD patients with significant residual kidney function (RKF). Although existing reviews demonstrated that ACEI/ARB significantly has benefit in preserving RKF in PD patients, evidence regarding the relative efficacy on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, and adverse events is lacking. Given that there exist few controlled trials of the effectiveness of ACEI/ARB in PD patients, we intend to perform a retrospective cohort study to assess the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the risk of long-term mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, and adverse events in terms of hyperkalemia. A retrospective cohort of Thai PD patients will be constructed by using the local joint registry data of adult PD patients from five centers in Thailand between 2006 to 2017 and followed to December 2018. We will link the following health datasets: (i) the electronic health records, contains outpatient and inpatient data; (ii) the Support System Pharmacy Dispensing extract, an administrative database which covers pharmacy dispensing; (iii) the PD Patient Care Database, which provides patient-level detail on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as long-term PD care data; and (iv) the Laboratory Support System extract, which includes claims and routine laboratory results. The exposure of interest in this cohort will be the use of ACEI/ARB within a 90-day after the date of PD initiation. Outcomes of interest will include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, a composite endpoint of cardiovascular events, and adverse events in terms of hyperkalemia.

NCT ID: NCT01587443 Active, not recruiting - Hemodialysis Clinical Trials

Comparison of Outcomes Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) presents a heavy burden on a patient's psychological and social life, as well as overall quality of life (QoL). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in dialysis patients measures the physical, social or emotional well-being that is affected by ESRD and/or its treatment, and has been increasingly used as an outcome measure in interventional studies. Additionally, associations between social support and QoL have been observed, indicating that improved social support could improve HRQoL, morbidity and mortality in ESRD patients. However, it is not clear if hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) have different impacts on HRQoL. Furthermore, comparisons of HRQoL and social support between HD and PD patients in the multiethnic society of Singapore have not been evaluated. As such, the investigators propose to conduct this cross-sectional study in the investigators local multiethnic ESRD patient population to evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes (HRQoL and social support), economic and clinical laboratory outcomes in HD and PD patients. All chronic HD and PD patients seen in NUH outpatient renal or PD clinic will be included in this cross-sectional, observational study. Information on patient demographics, medical/medication histories, dialysis vintage, clinical laboratory data and associated medical costs will be obtained from clinic notes, electronic medical records and hospital databases. Patient-reported outcomes will be determined from scores of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, Family Functioning Measure, Oslo-3 Social Support Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale and Health Services Utilization questionnaires (for indirect costs), and compared between HD and PD patients. Results from this study will provide important HRQoL information to assist renal physicians and patients to make treatment decisions. Furthermore, intervention programs could be developed to improve social support based on patients' needs. These could in turn improve patients' HRQoL, morbidity and mortality outcomes with minimal risks involved.