Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Implementation and Evaluation of PIPAC for the Treatment of Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis - a Feasibility Study.
This is a feasibility study that aims to evaluate whether PIPAC (Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy) is a safe and feasible treatment in Danish patients with peritoneal cancer.
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) represents end stage disease in many types of cancer (e.g.
gastric, pancreatic, liver, colo-rectal, ovarian) and the majority of patients with PC will
die from their disease within 6 months. Platinum-based systemic chemotherapy (SC) may prolong
survival in selected patients, but poor performance status and low response rates have led to
conservative (nihilistic) treatment strategies in these patients. However, patients with PC
who are in good condition, and with a remaining life expectancy of more than a few months,
may still have an unmet need for additional treatment in order to be able to perform with a
high quality of life for as long as possible. These patients often have tried several lines
of SC with disappointing results, and alternative and more effective treatment strategies are
desperately needed.
The installation of chemotherapeutic agents within the peritoneal cavity would seem a simple
and effective treatment of PC - at least from a theoretical point of view. Unfortunately, the
effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy on PC is disappointing. Like with SC, the poor
response rates may be explained by the poor penetration of the active chemical substances
into the PC plaques. Combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal chemotherapy
has gained interest in the recent years, but this approach can only be used in highly
selected patients (where CRS is possible), and the procedure carries a significant risk of
complications and side effects. Thus, a minimally invasive and safe delivery of relevant
chemotherapy in such concentration that may allow it to work efficiently on the PC plaques
would be an ideal platform for a new treatment strategy in these patients.
Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Temperature and pressure are
important factors during absorption of fluid from the peritoneal cavity, and the use of a
relative low intraperitoneal pressure (2-6 mmHg) seems to increase the inflow of
intraperitoneal fluid into the abdominal wall. Studies have confirmed that higher tissue
concentrations of chemotherapy may be obtained by increasing the intraperitoneal pressure.
After years of extensive testing, and the development of a micro-pump for safe aerosol
infusion, a German research group has designed a system that allows a laparoscopy controlled,
intraperitoneal aerosol infusion of chemotherapy (doxorubicin and cisplatin). The aerosol
technique ensures that the entire peritoneal surface is covered by chemotherapy, and this is
relevant in patients with PC. With the micro-pump positioned through a standard trocar
pointing away from the bowels, a commercially available injection pump provides the necessary
pressure to induce an aerosol mist covering the peritoneal cavity. After five minutes, the
chemotherapy has been delivered, and the injector is turned off. After an additional 25
minutes of simple diffusion, the intra-abdominal air saturated with chemotherapy is evacuated
through a standard trocar.
Recently, a German research group published their preliminary experience with PIPAC in
gastric and ovarian cancer patients with PC .
PIPAC is not available freely on the market, and the procedure is not FDA approved yet. The
German research team has emphasized, that despite the very encouraging results obtained so
far, the efficacy and safety of PIPAC still has to be assessed in adequate clinical trials.
Aim In a compassionate use program, the aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the
PIPAC procedure at Odense University Hospital under strict observation of both patient and
occupational health safety aspects. Thus, it is important to emphasize, that the primary aim
of this feasibility study is a quick and safe implementation of a new combined
surgical-oncologic treatment technique which uses conventional chemotherapy in a new way in
desperately ill cancer patients. For technical and safety reasons this implementation needs
to be fulfilled and documented before patients can be enrolled in clinical trials.
Hypothesis The investigators expect the PIPAC procedure to be feasible and safe, with a
primary non-access ratio of maximum 7:35 (mainly due to adhesions). The investigators expect
a CTCAE grade of no more than 3 and that the procedure is safe for both patients, surgeons
and OR staff.
Method
Study design This is a feasibility study where the PIPAC procedure will be performed in 35
patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria.
Implementation of the PIPAC procedure In order to cover all safety aspects and to secure
optimal treatment results, a complete manual and checklist for the entire PIPAC procedure, as
well as for pre- and postoperative patient handling, has been made. Thus, every step of the
procedure is carefully described and monitored, and prior to the first patient treatment, the
entire PIPAC procedure will be tried in a "dummy" OR setup supervised by the German group.
Although this group has documented, that the procedure is safe for both patients and health
care workers, the procedure will only be performed in an OR with laminar airflow and a closed
carbon dioxide (CO2) ventilation system. In addition, environmental measurements (platinum
particles within the OR) and bio-monitoring (blood samples) of the OR team are scheduled from
the beginning of the first PIPAC procedure.
Preliminary clinical evaluation 35 patients with PC (see inclusion criteria) will be
scheduled for PIPAC. In collaboration with the German group, the local multidisciplinary team
(MDT) meeting will carefully select patients suitable for the PIPAC procedure. These patients
are included according to national regulations and rules on experimental cancer research. All
PIPAC procedures are performed with prophylactic antibiotics and start with a classification
of the extent of the PC (Peritoneal Cancer Index, PCI) followed by selected quadrant biopsies
to document malignancy and for later translational research. The type and doses of
chemotherapy (1/10 of systemic dose), intra-abdominal pressure, temperature and delivery time
are similar to those used by the German group. After the PIPAC procedure, the patients will
be observed for two days before discharge. The treatment response is monitored by CT, and by
a follow-up laparoscopy procedure with PCI score and biopsies after six weeks. The PIPAC
procedure will be repeated during the same evaluation laparoscopy if objective response or no
progression is observed. Adverse medical events will be graded according to the Common
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 4.0), and surgical related
complications according to the Dindo-Clavien classification.
Intra-abdominal access and completion of the PIPAC procedure in 28 of 35 patients and
discharge of the same group within 2 POD are considered a successful implementation of the
PIPAC procedure.
Occupational health safety aspects For safety reasons no staff is in the OR during the PIPAC
procedure. The injector is controlled by a footswitch from outside the OR room, and
observation monitors related to the anesthesiology are also made visible from outside the OR.
Since no personnel are inside the ventilated OR room during application of the aerosolized
chemotherapy, there are three barriers between surgeons/OR staff and the chemotherapy: The
closed abdominal cavity, the laminar airflow system and the OR walls. The tightness of the
abdominal cavity is controlled by allowing a maximum CO2 flow of 0.1-0.2 L/min corresponding
to the body resorption of CO2. After the procedure, intraabdominal air saturated with
chemotherapy is evacuated through a series of filters and into a closed system. Closure of
the trocar sites, removal and disposal of dressings and syringes into special chemotherapy
waste bins are performed by the surgeon alone. Environmental biomonitoring and blood samples
from the surgeons and OR staff are scheduled as part of the safety monitoring.
Patient safety All patients are carefully selected (see exclusion criteria) on the MDT. The
establishing of pneumoperitoneum and use of trocars are based on the highest standards for
laparoscopic surgery which have a high safety profile. The procedures are performed by
experienced laparoscopic surgeons under the supervision of the German team. When following
the safety protocol used by the German group, no mortality related to the PIPAC procedure has
been observed. The risk of bowel perforation is 2 per mille, port site metastases occur in
0.6% of the procedures, and self- limiting erythema around the trocar site is found in 1.2%
of the procedures (private communication, professor Marc A. Reymond).
A short period of postoperative fever and/or elevated acute phase proteins have been observed
after the PIPAC procedure, but the majority of patients may be discharged the same or the
following day, and the PIPAC procedure can be repeated several times.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT04826432 -
Pasireotide to Reduce Clinically Relevant Digestive Leakage After Complete Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) Plus Hyperthermic Intra-Peritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03127774 -
Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04024917 -
Impact of Cardiac Coherence on Anxiety in Patients Operated on for a Peritoneal Carcinosis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03508570 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent or High Grade Gynecologic Cancer With Metastatic Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04352894 -
Intraoperative ICG Fluorescence Imaging for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Detection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05547568 -
A Nomogram to Predict Major Postoperative Complications After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Based on Pre and Peroperative Criteria: Which Patient Require Intensive Monitoring?
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01683864 -
Randomized Controlled Trial to Prevent Peritoneal Seeding in Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06318793 -
Preoperative Inflammatory Markers Predict Postoperative Complications After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Colorectal Carcinomatosis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04547725 -
Complete Cytoreduction Followed by IP and Systemic Chemotherapies for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03304210 -
PIPAC Nab-pac for Stomach, Pancreas, Breast and Ovarian Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03682744 -
CAR-T Intraperitoneal Infusions for CEA-Expressing Adenocarcinoma Peritoneal Metastases or Malignant Ascites (IPC)
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT04047771 -
A Phase I Study Evaluating SCB-313 for the Treatment of Subjects With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05623787 -
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance in High-risk Colorectal and Appendiceal Neoplasms
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05063019 -
Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Predicting Peritoneal Cancer Index
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02891447 -
Heated Mitomycin and Cisplatin During Surgery in Treating Patients With Stomach or Gastroesophageal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04231175 -
Dedicated MR Imaging vs Surgical Staging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04734691 -
Second Line Oxaliplatin Based Chemotherapy Alone Versus Oxaliplatin Based PIPAC and Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis : A Phase II Randomize Mutli-centric Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04108936 -
Longitudinal Study of CRS/HIPEC for Peritoneal Carcinomatoses
|
||
Completed |
NCT02604784 -
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Performed in Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal, Ovarian, Gastric Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01764789 -
Stress Reduction in Improving Quality of Life in Patients With Recurrent Gynecologic or Breast Cancer
|
N/A |