Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06209632
Other study ID # 202309076RINA
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 29, 2024
Est. completion date December 31, 2027

Study information

Verified date January 2024
Source National Taiwan University Hospital
Contact Yueh-Hsia Chen, PhD
Phone +886-3366-8133
Email yuehhsiachen@ntu.edu.tw
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this trial is to evaluate the effects of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation on motor recovery and neuroplasticity in patients with peripheral nerve injury. The main questions it aims to answer are Question 1: To compare corticomuscular coherence between the groups of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, sham mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, and control group. Question 2: To compare sensorimotor recovery between the groups of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, sham mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, and control group. Question 3: To evaluate the effects of each intervention on corticomuscular coherence and sensorimotor recovery 12 weeks post-intervention. Participants will be asked to exercise their affected hand together with the unaffected hand while receiving contralaterally controlled electrical stimulation in front of the mirror or sham mirror. Researchers will compare the effects of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation on corticomuscular coherence and sensorimotor recovery with the other groups.


Description:

The goal of this trial is to evaluate the effects of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation on motor recovery and neuroplasticity in patients with peripheral nerve injury. The main questions it aims to answer are: Question 1: To compare corticomuscular coherence between the groups of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, sham mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, and control group. Question 2: To compare sensorimotor recovery between the groups of mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, sham mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, and control group. Question 3: To evaluate the effects of each intervention on corticomuscular coherence and sensorimotor recovery 12 weeks post-intervention. Eligible participants will be randomized into three groups: MT and CCFES group: mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation Sham MT and CCFES group: Sham mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation Control group: conventional physiotherapy. Each participant will receive conventional physiotherapy for 50 minutes daily, twice a week for 12 weeks. Conventional physiotherapy includes scar management, joint range of motion exercise, strengthening, stretching, and functional training. Participants in the MT and CCFES group or Sham MT and CCFES group will receive 30 minutes daily, twice a week of the intervention for 12 weeks in addition to the conventional physiotherapy. In the MT and CCFES group, the participants will sit in front of the mirror and watch the mirror reflection of the unaffected hands. At the same time, contralaterally controlled electrical stimulation will be conducted to make the affected hands move with the unaffected hands. The participants in the Sham MT and CCFES group will sit in front of the mirror without mirror reflection, but doing the exercise with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation. All participants will receive the evaluations at baseline and 12 weeks after the intervention. The evaluations include: Electroencephalography of α and β bands from the sensorimotor cortices will be recorded. Electromyography will be performed during maximum isometric pinch or lateral pinch strength measurements. Maximum isometric grip strength, tip pinch strength, lateral pinch strength, sensation tests, and upper extremity function will be measured.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 27
Est. completion date December 31, 2027
Est. primary completion date November 21, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 20 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - newly diagnosed median or ulnar nerve transection injury of the forearm in the past 6 months - sufficient communication in the Chinese language - being able to follow instructions - the presence of target muscle denervation (e.g. muscle atrophy, inability to actively contract) - less than 10% surface EMG activity during pinch evaluation compared to the unaffected side Exclusion Criteria: - had central nervous disease - had a recent (1 year) history of nerve entrapment syndrome - had a history of latent neuropathy, such as diabetes or dialysis

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
mirror therapy
30 minutes of intervention, twice a week, and a total of 12 weeks
Device:
contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation
30 minutes of intervention, twice a week, and a total of 12 weeks
Behavioral:
conventional physiotherapy
50 minutes of intervention, twice a week, and a total of 12 weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Taiwan University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (14)

Bello UM, Kranz GS, Winser SJ, Chan CCH. Neural Processes Underlying Mirror-Induced Visual Illusion: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 31;14:276. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00276. eCollection 2020. — View Citation

Cengiz B, Vuralli D, Zinnuroglu M, Bayer G, Golmohammadzadeh H, Gunendi Z, Turgut AE, Irfanoglu B, Arikan KB. Analysis of mirror neuron system activation during action observation alone and action observation with motor imagery tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2018 Feb;236(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5147-5. Epub 2017 Dec 11. — View Citation

Chen YH, Siow TY, Wang JY, Lin SY, Chao YH. Greater Cortical Activation and Motor Recovery Following Mirror Therapy Immediately after Peripheral Nerve Repair of the Forearm. Neuroscience. 2022 Jan 15;481:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.11.048. Epub 2021 Dec 5. — View Citation

Deconinck FJ, Smorenburg AR, Benham A, Ledebt A, Feltham MG, Savelsbergh GJ. Reflections on mirror therapy: a systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 May;29(4):349-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968314546134. Epub 2014 Aug 26. — View Citation

Gatti R, Rocca MA, Fumagalli S, Cattrysse E, Kerckhofs E, Falini A, Filippi M. The effect of action observation/execution on mirror neuron system recruitment: an fMRI study in healthy individuals. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Apr;11(2):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9536-3. — View Citation

Huang JJ, Pei YC, Chen YY, Tseng SS, Hung JW. Bilateral Sensorimotor Cortical Communication Modulated by Multiple Hand Training in Stroke Participants: A Single Training Session Pilot Study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;9(12):727. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120727. — View Citation

Loh MS, Kuan YC, Wu CW, Liao CD, Hong JP, Chen HC. Upper Extremity Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Post-Stroke Individuals: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jul;36(7):472-482. doi: 10.1177/15459683221092647. Epub 2022 May 16. — View Citation

Rizzo M, Petrini L, Del Percio C, Lopez S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Babiloni C. Mirror visual feedback during unilateral finger movements is related to the desynchronization of cortical electroencephalographic somatomotor alpha rhythms. Psychophysiology. 2022 Dec;59(12):e14116. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14116. Epub 2022 Jun 3. — View Citation

Saavedra-Garcia A, Moral-Munoz JA, Lucena-Anton D. Mirror therapy simultaneously combined with electrical stimulation for upper limb motor function recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jan;35(1):39-50. doi: 10.1177/0269215520951935. Epub 2020 Aug 24. — View Citation

Thieme H, Morkisch N, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Borgetto B, Dohle C. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 11;7(7):CD008449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub3. — View Citation

Wang J, Fritzsch C, Bernarding J, Holtze S, Mauritz KH, Brunetti M, Dohle C. A comparison of neural mechanisms in mirror therapy and movement observation therapy. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):410-3. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1127. — View Citation

Willand MP, Rosa E, Michalski B, Zhang JJ, Gordon T, Fahnestock M, Borschel GH. Electrical muscle stimulation elevates intramuscular BDNF and GDNF mRNA following peripheral nerve injury and repair in rats. Neuroscience. 2016 Oct 15;334:93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.040. Epub 2016 Jul 29. — View Citation

Zhang JJQ, Fong KNK, Welage N, Liu KPY. The Activation of the Mirror Neuron System during Action Observation and Action Execution with Mirror Visual Feedback in Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neural Plast. 2018 Apr 24;2018:2321045. doi: 10.1155/2018/2321045. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

Zhang Y, Zhang X, Cheng C, Huang S, Hua Y, Hu J, Wang Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Liu Y, Jia J, Gou P, Zhang P, Zhou F, Wei X, Bai Y. Mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for the upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun 21:1-7. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2225878. Online ahead of print. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary change from baseline in corticomuscular coherence at week 12 coherence will be used to analyze the interaction between the electroencephalogram activation and electromyography activation baseline, week 12
Secondary change from baseline in grip strength at week 12 average grip strength measured for 3 times in killograms baseline, week 12
Secondary change from baseline in pinch strength at week 12 average lateral pinch and palmar pinch measured for 3 times in killograms baseline, week 12
Secondary change from baseline in sensation on Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test at week 12 force in grams baseline, week 12
Secondary change from baseline in function on Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome questionnaire at week 12 A total scale from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disability. baseline, week 12
Secondary change from baseline in maximum voluntary isometric contraction in surface EMG at week 12 muscle activities of target muscles measured during pinch strength for 3 times in percentage baseline, week 12
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02359825 - Nerve Repair Using Hydrophilic Polymers to Promote Immediate Fusion of Severed Axons and Swift Return of Function Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02865317 - Cortical Effects of Peripheral Nerve Injury At Birth N/A
Recruiting NCT01554722 - Needle Nerve Contact in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Block N/A
Recruiting NCT06071988 - Long Term Efficacy and Tolerability of AP707 in Patients With Chronic Pain Due to Traumatic or Post-operative Peripheral Neuropathy Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06071936 - Efficacy and Tolerability of AP707 in Patients With Chronic Pain Due to Traumatic or Post-operative Peripheral Neuropathy Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05541250 - Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Human Schwann Cell (ahSC) Augmentation in Severe Peripheral Nerve Injury (PNI) Phase 1
Completed NCT01116362 - Comparing Primary With Secondary Repair of Based on Electrodiagnostic Assessment and Clinical Examination Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT04270019 - Polyethylene Glycol to Improve Sensation Following Digital Nerve Laceration Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT01302275 - Oxcarbazepine for the Treatment of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Phase 4
Terminated NCT01088256 - Efficacy of Etoricoxib on Peripheral Hyperalgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT02228928 - Study of Capsaicin Patch for the Management of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Phase 1/Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00950391 - Enhancement of Functional Recovery After Peripheral Nerve Injury With Tacrolimus Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00953277 - Study of Nerve Reconstruction Using AVANCE in Subjects Who Undergo Robotic Assisted Prostatectomy for Treatment of Prostate Cancer Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06003166 - 4-AP Peripheral Nerve Crossover Trial Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02666456 - The Influence of Sensory Phenotype on the Risk of Developing Neuropathic Pain N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02352649 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Neovasculgen (Pl-VEGF165) Gene Therapy in Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injury Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT02034461 - Micro-Electrodes Implanted in a Human Nerve N/A
Completed NCT01596491 - Study of Possible Changes in QST After Application of Capsaicin on Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03147313 - Extracorporal Shock Wave Treatment to Improve Nerve Regeneration N/A