View clinical trials related to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Filter by:To compare the efficacy of Ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block versus ultrasound guided caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy
The study aims to evaluate the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with stage 2-4 chronic kidney disease
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the surgical standard for treating large or complex renal stones. The stones are removed by passing a small telescope through the side of the patient directly into the kidney, so the stone can be broken up and the fragments are removed .PCNL can be performed under general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. SA has some advantage over GA, such as lower postoperative pain, lower consumption of analgesic drugs and avoidance of side effects from multiple medications used in GA.However, SA induced sympathetic block leads to a decrease in the systemic vascular resistance and subsequent drop in the arterial blood pressure. Furthermore, anesthesia for PCNL usually requires a high sensory level reaching T4,resulting in a high incidence (nearly 33%) of hypotension. Also, to meet the long duration of surgery, drugs, ;like dexmedetomidine, are added to intrathecal local anesthetics , increasing the incidence of hemodynamic instability induced by the spinal anesthesia. Decreasing the systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and the venous return to the heart result in a reflex vasodilation, bradycardia and hypotension. This reflex is called Bezold -Jarisch reflex and is mediated by serotonin receptors (5_HT3) located on the vagus nerve and within the wall of the cardiac ventricles. Ondansetron; an antiemetic drug used for treatment of perioperative nausea and vomiting, was investigated as a 5HT antagonist for inhibition of Bezold - Jarisch reflex. While some studies proved its efficacy in prevention of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension , other studies could not support this conclusion .
The optimal management of medium-sized renal stones remains quite challenging and continues to be contested. In the present study, the investigators will compare mini-PNL, RIRS and SWL in the treatment of non- lower pole, medium size, high dense renal stones regarding the stone-free rate, the safety of the procedures, cost, and patients' and surgeon's satisfaction. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated into three equal groups (mini-PNL, RIRS, and SWL). Postoperative, patients will be followed-up by regularly for 3 months. The study parameters will be compared between groups.
The study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of QLB, as an anaesthetic method, for patients undergoing PCNL. Adult patients who agree to participate in the study will be included. Uncooperable patients, pregnant woman, active urinary tract infection, uncorrectable coagulation disorder, and those with known allergy to study medication will be excluded. Low dose spinal anaesthesia and Ultrasound-guided QLB will be performed. The success of the procedure, procedure-related complications, Intra- and post-operative hemodynamics, pain score, overall surgeon and patient satisfaction will be evaluated and reported.
Several studies were conducted to compare extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) as treatment options for medium size lower caliceal high dense stones. However, no studies compared these options for non- lower polar stones. In the present study the investigators will compare mini-PNL and SWL in treatment of non- lower polar, medium size, high dense renal stones in reference to the stone free rate and safety of the procedures. Pre-operative evaluation including abdominal non-contrasted computed tomography will be performed for all patients. Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups and will be treated by either mini-PNL or SWL. postoperative, patients will be followed by regularly for 3 months. the outcome of the procedures will be evaluated and compared between groups.
We aim to determine the preoperative predictors of sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with unilateral, solitary and proximal ureteral stones.
This double-blind dose-finding trial is based on a biased coin up-and-down sequential design, where the volume of local anesthetic administered to each patient depends on the response from the previous one. The TQL block is performed preoperatively, and the first patient recruited receives 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%. In case of block failure, the next patient will receive a higher volume (defined as the previous volume with an increment of 2 mL). Given a successful block for the first patient, the next patient will be randomized to either a lower volume (defined as the previous volume with a reduction of 2 mL) or the same volume as the previous patient. The respective probabilities being b=0.11 for a reduced volume and 1-b=0.89 for the same volume. Block success is defined as patient reported numeric rated scale (NRS) pain (NRS value ≤ 3 (0-10/10)), 30 minutes after arrival in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). The NRS pain value is our primary and only outcome in the evaluation of the block. A minimum of 25 eligible patients are needed to achieve precise estimation of MEV90 with narrow 95% confidence intervals derived by bootstrapping. Following inclusion of 25 patients early termination is considered when interim analysis shows sufficiently stabilization of MEV90 estimate. The final sample size is not known a priori, but a maximum of 40 patients will be enrolled in the trial.
This study was designed to evaluate whether patient position (lateral vs. prone) has affect on the need for analgesia and onset of pain after surgery.
prospective randomized study measuring the safety and efficacy of tubeless PNL in patients at assiut university hospital comparing to the standard PNL