QFR-based Virtual PCI Versus Angio-guided PCI — AQVA  

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Clinical Trial

Official title: Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

A significant portion of patients continue to experience both adverse events and symptoms after angiographically successful PCI. Beyond different underlying mechanisms non-related to epicardial disease (vasospasm, microcirculatory dysfunction), several recent studies have shown that in at least 15-20% of PCIs, a prognostically meaningful ischemia, detected with different coronary physiology tools, is present at the end of a successful angiography-guided PCI. In addition, physiology is able to discriminate the underlying reason causing the suboptimal functional result, namely: i) in-stent drop; ii) focal drop outside stent; iii) diffuse disease. However, the use of post-PCI physiology is still very low, even when it is utilized pre-PCI to set the indication for stenting. Lack of dedicated randomized clinical trials and procedural lengthening and increase in side effects are at the basis of this underutilization. In addition, the ideal tool should allow to plan the intervention in advance rather than to assess the results afterwards. To this hand, QFR is particularly appealing, among available physiology tools, because it does not need wire or adenosine and allows: i) identification of disease mechanism; ii) co-registration with angiography; iii) pre-PCI planning with residual vessel QFR value according to a pre-specified treatment. Taken all this characteristics together, QFR is the ideal technology for virtual PCI. The hypothesis of the present investigation is that a procedural planning based on QFR (virtual PCI) is able to reduce the rate of patients with post-PCI suboptimal functional result, that has been found to correlate with prognosis in our earlier study, if compared to the traditional angio-guided PCI.

Clinical Trial Description

Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiology The results of functional assessment performed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) taught us that a "successful" angiography-guided PCI is often suboptimal in terms of physiology and that physiology result after PCI is closely linked to outcome. Yet, post-PCI physiology is rarely utilized in clinical practice, being employed in less than 10% of lesions investigated with physiology pre-PCI. Reasons for the low use of functional assessment post-PCI and for subsequent intervention are manifold. First, physiology is actually used after PCI only in cases where it was utilized pre-PCI. Second, randomized clinical trials (RCT) addressing the use of physiology to assess PCI results have not been performed, therefore clear instructions and cutoffs for its use are lacking. Third, when fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured, the need to administer adenosine several times during the same procedure results in increased procedure time, cost and adverse side effects. Fourth, in case of a post-PCI suboptimal functional result, it may be difficult to ascertain the underlying cause. New indices and tools have been developed in an effort to overcome barriers to the widespread adoption of functional assessment. Non-hyperaemic pressure indices (NHPI) including, resting distal to aortic coronary pressure ratio (Pd/Pa), and other resting indices have enabled functional evaluation without pharmacological arteriolar vasodilation, while angiography-based functional assessment have eliminated the need for a dedicated pressure wire. Importantly, these newer tools may allow operators to understand the mechanism underlying an abnormal physiology value after angiographically successful intervention. In fact, the real novelty related to their development is the shift from a binary interpretation of physiology (positive/negative) to a quantitative site-specific one. For these reasons, they are extremely appealing post-PCI and several studies have been recently conducted to validate them in this setting. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) In particular, quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an angiographically-derived estimate of FFR developed as an alternative to wire-based intracoronary physiology. One advantage of angio-based FFR systems is allowing the generation of a pullback curve and discrimination of the physiological contribution of each single lesion as well as diagnosis of diffuse disease. The value of QFR to assess the functional results of PCI has been tested in the prospective Angio-Based Fractional Flow Reserve to Predict Adverse Events After Stent Implantation (HAWKEYE) study. Seven hundred fifty-one vessels in 602 patients undergoing angiographically satisfactory second-generation drug eluting stent (DES) implantation were analyzed. At the end of the procedure, the operator acquired projections for QFR computation performed offline by an independent core laboratory. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified a post-PCI QFR best cut-off of <0.90 (area under the curve 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.80; p< 0.001). After correction for potential confounding factors, post-PCI QFR<0.90 was associated with a 3-fold increase in risk for the vessel-oriented composite endpoint at 2 years (HR: 2.91; 95% CI 1.63-5.19; p< 0.001). Further, a very important finding of the HAWKEYE study was the demonstration that QFR could discriminate among different coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns. In vessels with suboptimal functional result, the site of the QFR drop was in-stent in 13% of the cases, while a focal drop outside the stent was identifiable in 32% of the cases. Thirty-four percent of vessels showed diffuse disease, while in 21% a combination of the aforementioned possibilities was present. It is important to note that QFR analyzability depends on quality of angiography and it is feasible in around 80% of the cases. Moreover, QFR is not applicable in specific lesion subsets such as left main, bifurcation and ostial lesions. Virtual PCI The inherent limit of post-PCI physiology is to add measurement and consequent actions after the end of a procedure that has been deemed successful by the same operator who is performing it. In addition, it is associated with the increase in procedural time and costs. Thus, a broad application of post-PCI physiology, although clinically meaningful, is implausible. On the contrary, the systematic application of QFR before stenting to simulate PCI results according to different treatment strategies (virtual PCI) would be an interesting alternative to achieve a fully physiology guided procedure. The advantages of a virtual PCI strategy based on QFR application are: - QFR is a simple tool, based on what the operator already performs before PCI (namely two perpendicular angiographic projections) and not requiring wire or adenosine. - It enables to obtain a full physiologic map of the vessel with a point-by-point detailed information of the functional impact of a given stenosis. - It is possible to simulate the treatment of one or more lesions (virtual PCI) in order to estimate the final functional value post-PCI. Then, virtual PCI based on QFR utilization would not increase procedural time or costs and could obtain an optimal post-PCI physiology result in most cases. The "Angio-based Quantitative flow ratio Virtual PCI versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the achievement of an optimal post-PCI QFR" (AQVA) trial is the first step toward this direction and will be the basis for a bigger study focused on hard clinical endpoints. OBJECTIVES To evaluate: - The rate of lesions with a final post-PCI QFR≥0.90 in patients treated with the QFR virtual PCI versus patients treated with an angiography-based PCI. - The rate of vessel-oriented composite endpoint (VOCE), defined as the composite of vessel-related cardiovascular death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR). SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION In the HAWKEYE trial population, 16% of lesions presented a post-PCI QFR <0.90 after an angio-guided PCI. In one third of these lesions, low post-PCI QFR was due to diffuse disease. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a procedural plan with QFR could be able to reduce the rate of lesions with QFR<0.90 by two thirds. Considering that some of the lesions with focal disease could also present diffuse disease, the investigators can realistically estimate a reduction by 60% with virtual-PCI. Therefore, 300 patients are required to have a 80% chance of detecting, as significant at the 5% level, an increase in the percentage of patient achieving a post-PCI QFR≥0.90 from 84% in the angio-guided group to 94% in the virtual PCI group. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Coronary Physiology
• Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

• NCT number: NCT04664140
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University Hospital of Ferrara
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 20, 2021
• Completion date: May 9, 2023