View clinical trials related to Peptic Ulcer.
Filter by:A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of hemostatic forceps and bipolar electrocautery probes in patient with high risk bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers.
This study aims at evaluating efficacy and safety of Vonorazon and amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple Therapy(bismuth#esomeprazole#tetracycline and furazolidone) in H. pylori rescue therapy. It is hypothesized that Vonorazon and amoxicillin dual therapy is non-inferior to bismuth-containing quadruple Therapy. Patients with confirmed failure of H. pylori eradication will be randomized to one of the treatments described above. At week 6 follow-up visits, a urea breath test#rapid urease test or helicobacter pylori stool antigen test will be performed to confirm eradication.
. This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via omitting the intraabdominal drains compared to regular using of the drains in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.
This study aims to evaluate safety and benefits of early oral feeding compared to traditional delayed oral feeding in patients undergoing perforated peptic ulcer repairs. Study population & Sample size :(
The goal of this clinical trial is to identify the most effective way to take acid-blocking medications to treat stomach ulcers in patients who have undergone gastric bypass surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: - is taking an acid-blocking medication by opening the capsule and only taking the contents of the capsule (open-capsule) more or less effective than taking the capsule as a whole (intact-capsule) for treating ulcers in patients who have a history of gastric bypass surgery? - does taking the open versus intact medication decrease the number of procedures and complications from untreated ulcers? Participants with ulcers will be instructed to take acid-blocking medications (called proton-pump inhibitors) either by opening the capsule and taking only the contents or by taking the capsule whole. These medications are the gold standard for treatment of stomach ulcers. Participants will be asked to undergo an upper endoscopy (EGD) every 3 months to monitor the healing of the ulcers. Researchers will compare how quickly the ulcers heal depending on which way the medications are taken (opened up or as a whole).
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of high-dose diphtherapy and bismuth quadruple therapy on H. pylori eradication on intestinal microecology, to clarify the changes in intestinal microbiota diversity and structure before and after the two treatment regimens, and to explore the relationship between different treatment regimens and intestinal microbiota dysbiosis; to further guide the safety and drug resistance of H. pylori eradication by the two treatment regimens. The expected results are to observe the changes of intestinal microbiota diversity and structure before and after treatment with the two treatment regimens.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of diosmin as adjuvant therapy in treatment of non-bleeding peptic ulcer patients.
Vonoprazan (VPZ), an oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) has emerged as an alternative potent acid-suppressant.It has a faster onset of action in 1 day (3-5 days in PPI), and is more stable in acidic condition than PPI. While many studies compared Vonoprazan against PPI in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, and gastric ulcers; thus far, there is a paucity of data on use of Vonoprazan on bleeding peptic ulcers. We perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of oral Vonoprazan against standard high dose PPI therapy in bleeding peptic ulcers that had received successful endoscopic haemostasis We hypothesize that in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, the use of acid pump inhibitors Vonoprazan would not be inferior to standard treatment of a bolus plus high dose PPI intravenous infusion at preventing recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis.
This research is to determine which medication, Esmesol (PPI) or Placebo works best at reducing the chance that a patient will get an marginal ulcer after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
This study plans to assess the effect of placement of abdominal drains on the outcomes of ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol in the perioperative management of peptic perforation. In the study arm ERAS protocol will be implemented avoiding use of abdominal drain. In the control arm abdominal drains will be placed in the early post operative period while using the ERAS protocol. The effect of drains on duration of post operative stay and other return to physiological parameter like onset of ambulation, oral intake, passing flatus and feces etc. will be studied. The investigators hypothesize that the non-placement of abdominal drain postoperatively will not have worse outcomes than in cases where it is used postoperatively, in terms of length of hospital stay. .