Clinical Trials Logo

Pelvic Organ Prolapse clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04894032 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Combination of Laparoskopic Uterosacral Ligament and Round Ligament Plication, A Meshless Method in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Start date: January 6, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Postoperative Results of a Meshless Method in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Combination of Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament and Round Ligament Plication.

NCT ID: NCT04890951 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Hysterectomy Versus Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

HUPPS
Start date: July 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of pelvic organs into the vagina resulting in bulge symptoms and occurs in approximately 50% of women. Almost 20% of women will elect surgical correction of this condition by age 85. Removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) with concomitant vaginal vault suspension is a longstanding practice in POP surgery to address apical (uterine) prolapse. Yet, contemporary evidence on the merits of this approach relative to preservation of the uterus through suspension is needed to better inform surgical decision-making by patients and their healthcare providers. The objective of this trial is to evaluate POP-specific health outcomes and service utilization of women electing uterine suspension compared to those electing hysterectomy and vaginal vault suspension for POP surgery up to 1-year post-surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04858438 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Pain After Insufflation for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy (PAIRS) Trial

Start date: April 2, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates post-operative pain between different insufflation pressures during robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Subjective pain and narcotic usage after surgery will be measured.

NCT ID: NCT04850365 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy

Start date: January 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the current study is to compare abdominal sacral cervicopexy with vaginal sacrospinous cervicopexy in women with apical prolapse in terms of operative time, procedures safety and efficacy.

NCT ID: NCT04829175 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Ethicon Pelvic Mesh Post Market Clinical Follow-up Registry

Start date: April 13, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The objective of this post market, clinical registry is to evaluate the performance of the products of the TVT family of products or vaginal vault or uterine prolapse repair (with laparotomic or laparoscopic approach including robotic assisted) using either Gynemesh PS Mesh or Artisyn Mesh in women undergoing surgery for SUI and POP.

NCT ID: NCT04829058 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

GYNEMESH PS Mesh Post Marketing Clinical Follow-Up Study

Start date: November 24, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The objective of this retrospective and prospective, single-arm, observational, multicenter, post-market study is to evaluate outcomes in women who underwent surgery for vaginal or uterine prolapse with a GYNEMESH PS Mesh.

NCT ID: NCT04807920 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB

Start date: September 23, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the study will be to assess the efficacy and safety of bladder BOTOX® for overactive bladder symptoms, such as urinary urgency and frequency, given at the time of prolapse surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04733560 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Preoperative Analgesia by Infiltration of the Pudendal Nerve Prior to Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension

PAINS
Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. It affects about half of women and causes uncomfortable bulge sensations (similar to sitting on a ball), urine and stool problems, difficulty with sexual activity and embarrassment. Almost one of every five women undergoes surgery to treat prolapse.Typically, vaginal surgery is done while patients are asleep and local anesthetic- freezing medication- is injected where incisions are made to minimize the pain from surgery when waking up. Pudendal blocks are nerve blocks where local anesthetic is used to freeze a nerve that supplies sensation to the vulva and vaginal area. It is traditionally used to help with pain for women giving birth, but hasn't been studied well in women undergoing vaginal surgery for prolapse. The investigators believe that by using a small amount of freezing to provide a pudendal block at the time of surgery, on top of the freezing typically provided, that there will be minimized pain after surgery and improve the recovery process. Based on previous studies using pudendal blocks for different vulvar and vaginal procedures, the investigators believe this to be a safe and potentially beneficial practice. The investigators are planning to conduct a randomized controlled trial of 50 women. 25 will receive pudendal nerve blocks at the time of surgery, and 25 will receive placebo injections.The investigators will monitor their pain scores, satisfaction, use of pain medications and return to activities in order to determine if our intervention has caused a significant improvement in recovery.

NCT ID: NCT04547816 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Functional Constipation

Efficacy of Conservative Treatment of Functional Defecatory Disorders in Females With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: July 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study is planned to evaluate the efficacy of complex conservative treatment (including tibial neuromodulation, biofeedback therapy, special pelvic floor training and diet modification) in women with pelvic organ prolapse

NCT ID: NCT04478747 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Prolapse, Vaginal Vault

Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- Study

TVM vs LCSP
Start date: July 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The main objective of the study is to compare subjective efficacy of trans vaginal mesh and laparoscopic colposakropexy (CSP) in women with an apical prolapse. The CSP group is further divided into two sub-groups; one where the mesh fixation is only at the apical part of the vagina, and another where the fixation is also extended to the levator plane. The secondary outcomes are safety (peri- and post-surgery complications, pain, erosion), objective efficacy (simplified POP-Q), and re-operation rate. Subjective outcome also includes the assessment of sexual satisfaction. Cost-effectiveness is studied by comparing both direct costs and QALYs.