View clinical trials related to Pelvic Fracture.
Filter by:Patients with pelvic fragility fractures suffer from high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the high incidence of these injuries, there is currently no regional or nationwide treatment protocol which results in a wide variety of clinical practice. New insights in treatment strategies, such as early diagnosis and minimal invasive operative treatment of these fragile patient population, has led to the development of several clinical pathways in recent literature. The aim of this study is to implement an evidence and experience-based treatment clinical pathway to improve the outcomes in this fragile patient population that currently has multifactorial risks for poor outcome.
This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients with pelvic fractures (Tile B and c) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Red Society Hospital and Xi'an 521 hospital, the patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the Order of admission: Experimental Group (intraoperative navigation combined with channel screw technique) and Control Group (open reduction and plate internal fixation) , the difference of operative effect between the two groups was compared by fracture reduction, channel screw position, operative time, fluoroscopy frequency, hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, recovery time and Mayo Score. Use Access 2003 to build a database and store data; use SPSS 21.0. 0 Software for statistical analysis. The entire process required the development of a standardized staff manual, and all were subject to rigorous training and examination in order to participate in the pilot, and the investigation process was supervised by the project leader.
1. To compare Single Trans-sacral screw fixation vs. two Ilio-Sacral screws fixation as regard time for starting weight bearing. 2. To compare between functional outcome using the Majeed Pelvic Score.