View clinical trials related to Pelvic Fracture.
Filter by:Patients with pelvic fragility fractures suffer from high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the high incidence of these injuries, there is currently no regional or nationwide treatment protocol which results in a wide variety of clinical practice. New insights in treatment strategies, such as early diagnosis and minimal invasive operative treatment of these fragile patient population, has led to the development of several clinical pathways in recent literature. The aim of this study is to implement an evidence and experience-based treatment clinical pathway to improve the outcomes in this fragile patient population that currently has multifactorial risks for poor outcome.
The primary aim of this investigation is to prospectively and clinically validate a novel, reproducible method of quantitative application of compressive stress to a LC1 pelvic ring injury of indeterminate stability for the purpose of assessing quantitative pelvic ring displacement.
Case series to describe the use of laparoscopy for the treatment of pelvic ring disruption.
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate fusion of the SI joint(s) and any reduction in VAS pain scores in a prospective cohort of patients utilizing the SiJoin® Transfixing Sacroiliac Fusion Device in patients that received sacroiliac fusion, without ancillary stabilization devices.
Prospective, single arm, post-market evaluation to evaluate the use and performance of the IM Implant in a post market setting.
This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients with pelvic fractures (Tile B and c) were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Red Society Hospital and Xi'an 521 hospital, the patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the Order of admission: Experimental Group (intraoperative navigation combined with channel screw technique) and Control Group (open reduction and plate internal fixation) , the difference of operative effect between the two groups was compared by fracture reduction, channel screw position, operative time, fluoroscopy frequency, hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, recovery time and Mayo Score. Use Access 2003 to build a database and store data; use SPSS 21.0. 0 Software for statistical analysis. The entire process required the development of a standardized staff manual, and all were subject to rigorous training and examination in order to participate in the pilot, and the investigation process was supervised by the project leader.
Many approaches to the surgical treatment of OF-P have been tried, but no one method has stood out as particularly successful. The placement of three implants, including implants that could minimise motion in the sacroiliac joint through early fixation and long-term fusion of the sacroiliac joint, can prevent micromotion in the fracture and thereby improve the clinical outcome of OF-Ps. The iFuse-3D implant was shown to be safe and effective for chronic sacroiliac pain in non-osteoporotic patients. The primary aim is to assess the proportion of patients operated on using iFuse-3D in conjunction with transiliac-transsacral screws who regain pre-fracture mobility by the time of hospital discharge.
With a prospective case series study of 15 patients The aim of this study is to estimate the clinical outcomes in patients with unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures ( B&C ) after treatment with (INFIX)
Unrecognized abdominal and pelvic injuries can result in catastrophic disability and death. Sporadic reports of "occult" injuries have generated concern, and physicians, fearing that they may miss such an injury, have adopted the practice of obtaining computed tomography on virtually all patients with significant blunt trauma. This practice exposes large numbers patients to dangerous radiation at considerable expense, while detecting injuries in a small minority of cases. Existing data suggest that a limited number of criteria can reliably identify blunt injury victims who have "no risk" of abdominal or pelvic injuries, and hence no need for computed tomography (CT), without misidentifying any injured patient. It is estimated that nationwide implementation of such criteria could result in an annual reduction in radiographic charges of $75 million, and a significant decrease in radiation exposure and radiation induced malignancies. This study seeks to determine whether "low risk" criteria can reliably identify patients who have sustained significant abdominal or pelvic injuries and safely decrease CT imaging of blunt trauma patients. This goal will be accomplished in the following manner: All blunt trauma victims undergoing computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis in the emergency department will undergo routine clinical evaluations prior to radiographic imaging. Based on these examinations, the presence or absence of specific clinical findings (i.e. abdominal/pelvic/flank pain, abdominal/pelvic/flank tenderness, bruising abrasions, distention, hip pain, hematuria, hypotension, tachycardia, low or falling hematocrit, intoxication, altered sensorium, distracting injury, positive FAST imaging, dangerous mechanism, abnormal x-ray imaging) will be recorded for each patient, as will the presence or absence of abdominal or pelvic injuries. The clinical findings will serve as potential imaging criteria. At the completion of the derivation portion of the study the criteria will be examined to find a subset that predicts injury with high sensitivity, while simultaneously excluding injury, and hence the need for imaging, in the remaining patients. These criteria will then be confirmed in a separate validation phase of the study. The criteria will be considered to be reliable if the lower statistical confidence limit for the measured sensitivity exceeds 98.0%. Potential reductions in CT imaging will be estimated by determining the proportion of "low-risk" patients that do not have significant abdominal or pelvic injuries.
Pelvic fracture is a usual injury in trauma patients. An unstable trauma patient with a pelvic fracture has an elevated risk of death due to pelvic bleeding and the associated injuries. Traditionally, it has been estimated that the main source of bleeding is venous and, consequently, the main treatment has been the preperitoneal pelvic packing. Nevertheless, according to new data, arterial bleeding appears to be a more important source of pelvic bleeding than it was thought and angioembolization seems to be a good alternative in the treatment of these injuries. Consequently, it is important to define better the management of these patients. This investigation project consists in a clinical trial study, performed by a multidisciplinary team of many hospitals around the country, in which angioembolization and preperitoneal pelvic packing are compared. Unstable trauma patients with a pelvic fracture and no other injuries (negative FAST / peritoneal aspiration, no evidence of bone fractures or thoracic injuries) will be submitted, in less than 60 minutes from hospital arrival, to angioembolization or preperitoneal pelvic packing, according to randomization. There will be a specific timing evaluation of different markers: hemodynamic (vital signs at arrival, immediately and 24 hours after treatment) and analytic (at arrival and upon entering to the Intensive Care Unit). Registered variables include: blood cell transfusions, vasoactive drug requirements, time elapsed between hospital admission and intervention, treatment duration, need of other strategies to stop pelvic bleeding, complications and mortality. The objective of this study is to determinate if angioembolization is superior to preperitoneal pelvic packing for pelvic bleeding control in unstable trauma patients due to pelvic bleeding.