View clinical trials related to Pelvic Floor Disorders.
Filter by:The OPTIONs study is a randomized controlled, non-inferiority study to evaluate postoperative care using outpatient clinic visits versus telephone calls for women undergoing surgery for pelvic floor disorders. The primary outcome is patient satisfaction using the Surgical-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (S-CAHPS) questionnaire provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Secondary outcomes include safety and cost analysis for patients' direct and indirect medical costs. Women who speak and understand either English or Spanish and planning to undergo an elective surgery for a pelvic disorder will be recruited. Baseline demographics, satisfaction, and cost analysis questionnaires will be acquired pre-operatively. Randomization will be assigned at the time of discharge from the hospital. Patients will either have scheduled clinic visits at 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months or telephone calls by a registered nurse at these same intervals. Questionnaires will be completed at 3 months for satisfaction and cost analysis.
The investigators intend to measure compliance with attending pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in a Urogynecology population by randomizing patients to either viewing a four minute educational video or reading a handout explaining the therapy.
Anal Acoustic Reflectometry (AAR) is a reliable and reproducible technique that has been studied in our department over the last 6 years. Sound waves pass into a balloon placed in the anal canal and are used to measure the cross-sectional area. By gradually increasing and decreasing the pressure in the balloon the investigators can measure the pressure at which the cross-sectional area starts to increase and decrease, and the anal canal starts to open and close. This assessment mimics the natural opening and closing of the anal canal and the effect of squeezing the muscles. Rectal intussusception occurs when the rectal wall telescopes into itself distally and is termed prolapse when it protrudes through the anal canal. Not all patients will require surgery and, for some, it can lead to debilitating symptoms of constipation, pain and faecal incontinence. Currently, the Oxford grading system through radiological testing is used for classifying severity of rectal intussusception and prolapse; however this does not give us sufficient information about the anal sphincter muscles. The gold standard investigation of the anal sphincter muscles has been manometry which measures anal canal pressure at rest and during squeeze. However, it has limitations. In previous studies AAR has shown promise in the assessment of faecal incontinence and, that unlike manometry, it has been able to distinguish between different types of incontinence. Thus far, it has not been studied in patients with rectal intussusception and it is hoped that AAR parameters may provide an indication of when rectal intussusception becomes overt rectal prolapse. This can inform the clinician to guide further management of a group of patients with a condition that can have significant impact on quality of life.
Fecal incontinence (FI) is clinically subtyped as urge FI and passive FI based on symptoms, however the pathophysiologic significance of this subtyping is not known. FI is commonly encountered in women with pelvic floor disorders. This study aims to compare characteristics of clinical severity, quality of life, anatomy, and physiology of urge FI versus passive FI. Urogynecology patients greater than age 18 with FI at least monthly over the last 3 months will be recruited for participation. Participants will be divided into urge FI subtype and passive FI subtype. Participants will complete validated questionnaires on clinical severity and quality of life, both as related to FI and general heath. Participants will undergo pelvic examination, endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry for evaluation of anatomic and physiologic pathology. Results between both groups will be compared. The investigators hypothesize that clinical, anatomic, and physiologic characteristics differ between urge-predominant fecal incontinence and passive-predominant fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.
This pilot study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of an educational workshop on pelvic floor disorders and its potential impact on decisional conflict.
Objective of this longitudinal observational cohort study was to analyze incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) symptoms, including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence (UI), and fecal incontinence (FI), seven to twelve years after delivery, in two groups of singleton primiparae after vaginal delivery (VD) and cesarean section (CS).
This study randomizes postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse planning native tissue transvaginal surgical repair to 6-8 weeks of preoperative and 1-year continued postoperative vaginal estrogen cream compared to placebo cream. This clinical trial and basic science investigation are designed to understand the mechanisms by which local estrogen treatment affects connective tissues of the pelvic floor and determine whether its use before and after prolapse repair will (i) improve success rates of the surgical intervention and minimize prolapse recurrence and (ii) impact favorably upon symptoms of other pelvic floor disorders.
The aim of the study was the define changes LAM morphology, biometric measurements of the LAM and genital hiatus at immediate evaluation of pelvic floor and at 3 month after delivery was evaluated. We also sought to define the optimal time for evaluation of pelvic floor after childbirth
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) is sometimes used for difficult births, but whether it contributes to postpartum pelvic muscle disorder is unclear. This randomized controlled trial examined whether CSEA affects the electrophysiological index of postpartum pelvic floor muscle during labor. The investigators plan to recruit 300 primiparous healthy women.
The proposed study is to evaluate if there are specific factors in the pelvic floor functional anatomy which can predict the ability of having a vaginal birth after caesarean section. Physical characteristics of the soft tissue in the female pelvis play an important role in successful vaginal delivery. A "tight" or less distensible pelvic floor muscles may influence mode of delivery, leading to poor labour progression and by compressing foetal head produce CTG abnormality such as decelerations, both resulting in caesarean delivery. One of the main structures of the pelvic floor, the puborectoalis muscle, facilitates the passage of fetal head through the birth canal by stretching and distending. Therefore distensibility of the female pelvic floor influences mode of delivery. Three hundred patients, in the third trimester of pregnancy, will be recruited via the antenatal clinics to minimize any disruption in their pregnancy care provision. Eligible participants are pregnant women who had either one or no vaginal births, or one caesarean section and who can give an informed consent and maintain their autonomy regarding mode of delivery with understanding of the forthcoming study results. Participants will be excluded if they sustain any obstetric complications that may impede on time and mode of delivery including an emergency prelabour caesarean section. Ultrasonographic assessment of the differences in the pelvic characteristics of these women will be used to predict a successful of trial of vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) in subsequent pregnancies. The results will be used to better inform whether there is a simple (single ultrasound assessment) that can be used to help inform women's choice regarding mode of delivery. Results from this research could be a pioneering blueprint for further studies, as there is very little known about this topic.