View clinical trials related to Patient Preference.
Filter by:This study examines the patient satisfaction and perspective on the use of ultrasound guided midline intravenous catheters compared to standard ultrasound guided peripheral catheters.
MYLENE is a prospective, multicenter, NIS to evaluate the patient and HCP satisfaction of sc and iv application of daratumumab in routine clinical practice in Germany. Patients observed in this study will be transplant ineligible NDMM patients for which the physician foresees an anti-myeloma therapy using DRd regimen as per local label. 250 NDMM patients treated with DRd will be enrolled (excluding screening failures, i.e., enrolled patients not fulfilling selection criteria identified before treatment start will be replaced) within 12 months in a proportion of approximately 1/3 patients receiving daratumumab sc and 2/3 patients receiving daratumumab iv as per physician's decision.
Through our study, we aim to understand the most important factors for patients when they decide on the type of treatment they receive for MIBC. Our study consists of a discrete choice experiment (DCE): a type of questionnaire used to elicit preferences in the absence of data. DCEs are frequently used in oncological research to elicit preferences from participants without directly asking them to state their preferred options. Participants undertaking our DCE questionnaire will presented with a series of alternative hypothetical scenarios containing several variables or "attributes" (5), each of which may have a number of variations or "levels".
This research study is comparing telemedicine and face-to-face visits to understand patients' experiences with telemedicine versus face to face visits and to understand when it is and is not appropriate to conduct visits remotely
This study is aiming to look into patients' treatment preferences and their socio economic background as well as the exploration of thought processes leading to these preferences. It will integrate, in two exploratory questionnaires, the three most common treatment schema (standard of care, non-operative management, surgery alone) all of which have been demonstrated efficacious.
In this study, the investigators show that by upskilling of primary care physicians (PCPs) in SDM and leveraging on a novel pictorial Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score (VAUS), they can enhance older men's recognition of LUTS and stimulated discussion with their PCPs.
HIV Treatment simplification strategies that involve switching cART regimens from four or three antiretrovirals to two in virologically suppressed patients living with HIV are now available in order to reduce long-term toxicity and enhance treatment adherence. Dolutegravir is a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) with noticeable advantages, including a high genetic barrier to drug resistance, once-daily dosing and lower risk of drug-drug interactions because this agent does not inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 isoenzymes or P-glycoprotein transporters. Dolutegravir is generally well tolerated and the INSTI class is considered to be more "metabolically friendly" compared with other drug classes such as protease inhibitors (PIs). Thus, the combination of dolutegravir plus a second active agent is a particularly inviting option for maintenance treatment and research in this area is evolving. However, though safety and efficacy of dolutegravir are well known, there is no study evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs), i.e. subjective and self-reported measures of the patient's health perception. In an era of the efficacy of HIV regimens are more and more comparable, the main discriminant criteria to choose the best treatment option are now adherence and self-reported measures of a patient's health - termed "patient-reported outcomes" (PROs). The study, based on a mixed methodology, include a qualitative part and a quantitative part. The qualitative study will explore patients' and health care professionals' perceptions, knowledge, and representations of triple or quadruple and dual therapies and detect the degree of agreement or disagreement between patients' and practitioners' perspectives. The quantitative study's main objective is to measure the Dovato regimen's impact on a patient's perception (Patient-Reported Outcomes - PRO) on acceptability, toxicity, preference, and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL). PRO are collected through self-administered questionnaires at D0 (when the patient switch treatment), M1 and M6.
In order to improve quality of care at the department, the investigators will perform a focus group interview study with patients and family members. They will perform 6 (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) focus group interviews with patients and 6 (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) with family members.
To investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing bilateral RLE surgery with treatment of dexamethasone intracanilicular insert compared to topical standard care steroid. Desiged to look at patient preference comparing the insert to drops and will also look at patient outcomes including inflammatin and risk of cystoid macular edema post-operatively.
The aim of this study was to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of Lumbar Spine Surgery Expectations Survey developed by Mancuso.