Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Enrolling by invitation
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03904290 |
Other study ID # |
12132016.027 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Enrolling by invitation |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 5, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
University of Oregon |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The overarching goal of this study is to examine cardiopulmonary and respiratory physiology
pre and post PFO/ASD closure in patients who are undergoing surgical closure of their
PFO/ASD.
Description:
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in ~30% of the general population. The PFO has
historically been considered to be trivial. However, recent work by the investigator's group
and others has identified that, compared to individuals without a PFO, those with a PFO have
a higher core body temperature, significantly worse pulmonary gas exchange efficiency,
blunted ventilatory responses to chronic hypoxia and acute carbon dioxide and increased
susceptibility to altitude illnesses such as acute mountain sickness, and high altitude
pulmonary edema. Specific to this application, subjects with a PFO maybe worse pulmonary gas
exchange efficiency because a PFO is a potential source of right-to-left shunt that will make
pulmonary gas exchange efficiency worse. If true, then this may negatively impact exercise
capacity and/or exercise tolerance.
The investigator's lab group has demonstrated that hypoxemia increases blood flow through
intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses (IPAVA) in healthy and subjects with COPD. When
these subjects breathe 100% O2 it prevents or reduces blood flow through IPAVA. This suggests
that hypoxemia per se induces blood flow through IPAVA. The blood flow through IPAVA and
presence of a PFO is also associated with increased risk of stroke and/or transient ischemic
attack (TIA). In addition, an atrial septal defect (ASD) is a hole within the interatrial
septum, and is considered a congenital heart defect. An ASD is typically larger than a PFO,
and thus, the symptoms may be worse in those with an ASD, compared to those with a PFO. Thus,
some hypoxemic patients who have had a stroke or transient ischemic attack, who also have a
PFO/ASD may undergo surgical closure of their PFO/ASD to prevent subsequent neurological
sequelae. This surgical closure may also prevent the hypoxemia thereby reducing or preventing
blood flow through IPAVA. Of note, blood flow through IPAVA has been demonstrated to be
strongly correlated with TIA and/or stroke and has not previously been taken into
consideration in randomized clinical trials mentioned below.
Three randomized clinical trials have determined that PFO closure is not superior to regular
medical management, for the prevention of subsequent stroke and/or TIA. Nevertheless, the
American Heart Association still recommends that "in patients with cryptogenic [unexplained]
TIA or stroke, a PFO, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), guidelines from the American College of
Chest Physicians currently recommend vitamin K antagonist therapy for 3 months and
consideration of PFO closure rather than no vitamin K antagonist therapy or aspirin therapy."
Additionally, in the largest single center retrospective study performed to date, PFO closure
for the purpose of preventing hypoxemia was found to result in "improvement in
echocardiographic evidence of right to left shunt, New York Heart Association functional
class, and oxygen requirement." Thus, PFO/ASD closure remains a potentially beneficial option
for both hypoxemic and stroke/TIA patients.
Lastly, preliminary data also suggest greater levels of plasma inflammatory mediators in
subjects with a PFO and systemic inflammation is associated with increased risk of
cardiovascular diseases. Importantly, exercise is known to reduce so of these systemic
inflammatory mediator levels. Thus, PFO/ASD closure may allow for greater exercise capacity
and a subsequent reduction in inflammation.
Thus, although a PFO has been traditionally considered to have a minimal impact of physiology
and pathophysiology, emerging evidence suggests this may not be the case. The investigator's
lab is focused on understanding how and why a relatively small hole in the heart (PFO/ASD)
can have a relatively large impact on cardiopulmonary and respiratory physiology.