Comparison of Effects of Mobilization With Movement and Kinesiotaping in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparison of Short-Term Effects of Mobilization With Movement and Kinesiotaping on Pain, Function and Balance in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Control

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02707679
• Other study ID #: LUT 12/175
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 2, 2016
• Last updated: March 13, 2016
• Start date: May 2013
• Est. completion date: August 2015

Study information

• Verified date: March 2016
• Source: Hacettepe University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Turkey: Ethics Committee
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS), also known as the anterior knee pain, is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. Most of the patients suffer from knee pain for long time. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of Mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patient with PFPS.

Description:

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome is one of the most common musculoskeletal problem in the world. It's incidence is also becoming higher and most people who have knee pain suffer from it for long time. In the treatment of PFPS, conservative treatment methods are preferred prior to surgical ones. When the literature was reviewed, no study in which Mobilization with movement (MWM) method was used and in which the effects of it was shown and compared with (Kinesiotaping) KT has been found so far with respect to the treatment of PFPS. Thirty-five female patients diagnosed with unilateral PFPS were randomly assigned into 2 groups. The patients in the first group (n=18) received two techniques of Mobilization with movement intervention while Kinesiotaping was applied to the other group (n=17). Both groups were treated with exercise. All patients received 4 sessions of treatment twice a week for a period of 2 weeks and followed up in accordance with a 6-week-home exercise program. Primary outcomes: pain severity, knee range of motion, hamstring flexibility, and physical performance (10-step stair climbing test, timed up and go test), Kujala Patellofemoral Pain Scoring and Y-Balance test were assessed.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 35
• Est. completion date: August 2015
• Est. primary completion date: August 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 20 Years to 45 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• having knee pain at least 3 months and more than 3 points according to visual analog scale

Exclusion Criteria:

• no complying to the rehabilitation

• if patient wants to finished and want to complete study, they were excluded

• having meniscus, bursa, ligament, patellar tendon lesions, patellofemoral dislocation and/or recurrent subluxation, undergone lower extremity surgery

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
• Somatoform Disorders
• Syndrome

Intervention

Other:
• Mulligan's Straight leg-raise with traction
Mulligan's Straight leg raise technique was performed on patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. The extremity on which the practice would be performed in supine position was grasped from the ankle level and was, then, subjected to traction longitudinally. Afterwards, the knee was lifted up passively while in extension and was kept for waiting for a few seconds at the point where tension was felt and was, then, returned to its initial position. The practice was repeated 10 times, and 3 sets of practice at 1-minute-intervals were performed.
• Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement
Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement technique was performed on patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Each patient was tested in every direction in the course of the active knee flexion-extension movement so as to find out the best pain-free tibial gliding direction (medial-lateral part of the tibia, anterior-posterior, internal-external rotation). At the time of the active movement of the knee, the tibial gliding direction where pain was felt at the least was selected as the treatment direction of mobilization technique along with movement. The practice was performed by doing 10 repetitions for 3 sets and by providing 1-minute-resting time between the sets.
• Kinesiotaping
Kinesiotaping was applied on patient with patellofemoral pain syndrome. To maintain proprioceptive stimulation in the quadriceps (from origo towards insertio) and to alleviate the tension of hamstring muscle, a 'Y''-shaped kinesiotape was applied by using the muscle technique.
• Exercise
All the patients were provided with several exercises within the scope of the home exercise program, such as hamstring muscle stretching, quadriceps isometric exercises, 4-way-strengthening with exercise elastic bands for the muscles of the hip, knee locking on foot and mini-squatting exercises. They were asked to do these exercises in 3 sets a day along with 10 repetitions for a period of 6 weeks.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hacettepe University

References & Publications (3)

Collado H, Fredericson M. Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin Sports Med. 2010 Jul;29(3):379-98. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2010.03.012. Review. — View Citation

Djordjevic OC, Vukicevic D, Katunac L, Jovic S. Mobilization with movement and kinesiotaping compared with a supervised exercise program for painful shoulder: results of a clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jul;35(6):454-63. doi: 10.1016/j. — View Citation

Kuru T, Yaliman A, Dereli EE. Comparison of efficiency of Kinesio® taping and electrical stimulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(5):385-92. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Knee pain measured with Visual Analog Scale	Patient's knee pain was measured with Visual Analog Scale	6 weeks	No
Secondary	Knee joint range of motion was measured Universal goniometer.	Universal goniometer was used for evaluating the knee joint range of motion.	6 weeks	No
Secondary	Balance measured with Y- Balance Test	The dynamic balance measurements of the patients were evaluated through Y- Balance Test	6 weeks	No
Secondary	Function was measured with 10-step-ascent & descent stair-climbing test.	To evaluate the functional performances of the patients, 10-step-ascent & descent stair-climbing test was used.	6 weeks	No
Secondary	Function was measured Kujala patellofemoral scoring system	Patient's function was measured with Kujala patellofemoral scoring system	6 weeks	No
Secondary	Function was measured with timed up&go test	To evaluate the functional performances of the patients, timed up&go test was used.	6 weeks	No
Secondary	Hamstring muscle flexibility was measured Universal goniometer.	Universal goniometer was used for evaluating the hamstring muscle flexibility.	6 weeks	No