View clinical trials related to Parastomal Hernia.
Filter by:This is a non-randomised case-controlled prospective study of consecutive patients with parastomal hernia, comparing the laparoscopic Keyhole repair with the modified Sugarbaker repair.
This will be a randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of radiographic hernia recurrence 2 years after parastomal hernia repair utilizing the retro-muscular Sugarbaker technique compared to the retro-muscular keyhole mesh technique. The primary endpoint will be recurrence at two years. Secondary endpoints will be the incidence of mesh-related complications, all 30-day complication rates, and hospital length of stay. Patients eligible for the study will be 18 years or older with a parastomal hernia that requires open repair retromuscular repair without ostomy reversal as determined by one of five hernia surgeons who will participate in this study at the investigators' institution. All patients will be marked for a new stoma site preoperatively. Patients who have insufficient bowel length suitable for either technique will be excluded intraoperatively. Patients enrolled in the study will be entered in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database by the attending surgeon. The database houses patient demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, and postoperative outcomes - all entered by the attending surgeon.
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the overall outcomes after parastomal hernia repairs in Denmark from 2007-2017 using data from the Danish Hernia Database and Danish Patients Registry. Specifically, the readmission and reoperation rates will be evaluated.
It is not well-established whether a parastomal bulge impacts stoma patients HRQoL or if HRQOL differs according to the underlying disease or type of stoma. In this large cross-sectinal study stoma patients with and without a parastomal bulge are asked about their health-related quality of life and stomarelated quality of life. Stoma patients are identified in the danish stoma database and contacted two times by email. Non-responders are sent a paper booklet.
Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating whether prophylactic laparoscopic placement of a dual-component IPOM mesh around a colostomy may prevent parastomal hernia compared with conventional colostomy after abdominoperineal resection. Eligible subjects will be recruited prospectively from five Finnish Hospitals (Oulu University Hospital,Vaasa Central Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Lahti Central Hospital, Jyväskylä Central Hospital). Patients were considered eligible for this study if undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients are randomized to prophylactic preperitoneal placement of a dual-component mesh (Dynamesh IPOM) around permanent colostomy or to conventional permanent colostomy. Estimating a parastomal hernia rate of 50%, a sample size of 26 patients per each study group is projected to provide 90% power (1-beta) with a alpha 0.05 (2-beta) to detect a 40% reduction in risk for parastomal hernia at 1-year. Since we expect a dropout rate of 20%, 37 patients per study group will be included in this study. All abdominoperineal resections are performed using laparosopic technique. At the and of the abdominal laparoscopic phase the straight permanent end colostomy is performed. In the intervention group the 10 x 10 cm Dynamesh IPOM mesh is cut in the middle according to volume of the bowel. Stapled bowel end is then pulled through the crosswise opened mesh, which is pushed to the abdomen and fixed to the peritoneum. Follow-up visits are scheduled at 1-, 3- and 12-month after surgery. Patients are evaluated for their clinical status and C-reactive protein, leukocytes and hemoglobin are assessed at each control visit. Computed tomography (CT) scan with and without Valsalva maneuver is performed 12 months after surgery for radiological evaluation of possible parastomal hernia. The primary end-point of this study is the incidence of clinically and radiologically detected parastomal hernias, and their extent 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcome end-points were colostomy-related morbidity such as stomal stenosis, necrosis and/or wound infection.The extent of parastomal hernia was graded at CT according to the Hernia Society criteria. Statistical analysis is performed using a SPSS statistical software. Continuous variables are reported as the mean and standard deviation, whereas nominal variables are reported as counts and proportions. Univariate analysis is performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. P-values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant.
Parastomal herniation is difficult to treat. Several different treatment has been tested but still none has revealed to be superior. The use of a mesh has been shown to be a promising way of treating. In this study the investigators will evaluate safety and hernia recurrence rate with a mesh tailored to treat parastomal hernias "Parastomal hernia mesh BARD" in patients with parastomal hernia requiring surgery.
Introduction: parastomal hernia (PH) is a frequent complication after an ostomy, despite the many prevention and treatment techniques that have been described. Since the introduction of laparoscopy, the frequency of PH is even higher than in open surgery. This type of hernia remains a surgical problem of considerable importance, requiring significant consumption of public health and economic resources, and representing a major alteration of the quality of life of these patients. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of the insertion of a prosthesis to prevent PH in elective surgery for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Methodology: prospective, multidisciplinary, multi-center randomized controlled study. Control group: Rectal neoplasms undergoing elective surgery for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Study group: Rectal neoplasms undergoing elective surgery for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with a lightweight mesh (polypropylene and poliglecaprone 25). Sample size was calculated based on a proportion of parastomal hernia of 65% in the control group and 15% in the study group. With an α risk =0.05 and 1- β= 0.8, 28 patients are required, 14 per group. Estimating a drop-out rate of 10%, the final number will be 32 patients. The efficacy will be evaluated clinically at six months and abdominal CT will be performed at 12 months along with another clinical evaluation.
The Danish Ventral Hernia Database (DVHD) registers 37 different perioperative parameters. The aim of present study is to use large-scale data from DVHD to uncover risk factors for readmission, reoperation (any indication), death and reoperation for recurrence after parastomal hernia repair.
The purpose of this study is to compare rates of hernia formation between colostomies created with no hernia preventing mesh versus colostomies created with a particular mesh.
Specific aim: To compare patients with colostomies with or without mesh at the primary operation. Primary endpoint is the incidence of parastomal hernia requiring surgery. All patients at participating centers scheduled for permanent colostomy, after signing informed consent and meeting inclusion criteria, will be randomised to formation of a stoma with or without mesh. If the inclusion criteria is fulfilled and informed consent is signed, the patient is randomised preoperatively.