View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Filter by:To evaluate the efficacy of Surufatnib combined withcamrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as the first-line treatment in metastatic pancreatic cancer
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan liposome injection in combined with oxaliplatin plus tegafur (NASOX) for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of surufatinib combined with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with locally advance d pancreatic cancer
The study aims to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended combination dose of the MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor AMG 193 administered in combination with other therapies in adult participants with metastatic or locally advanced methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)-deleted gastrointestinal, biliary tract, or pancreatic cancers. The study also aims to determine the safety profile of AMG 193 administered in combination with other therapies in adult participants with metastatic or locally advanced MTAP-deleted gastrointestinal, biliary tract, or pancreatic cancers.
This trial is a phase II clinical trial of the safety and efficacy of PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) in combination with paclitaxel (albumin-bound type) and gemcitabine and PULSAR radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer and patients with only local recurrence after pancreatic cancer surgery, to observe the safety and efficacy of PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) in combination with paclitaxel (albumin-bound type) and gemcitabine and PULSAR in the treatment of patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.
This is a single-center, open label, single-arm, investigator-initiated study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XH001 (neoantigen cancer vaccine) sequential combination with ipilimumab and chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients following surgical resection.
Neutropenia, a decrease in the number of neutrophils, a type of white blood cell, due to the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapeutic drugs, is a frequent occurrence in patients receiving anticancer drug therapy, which increases the risk of infection, which can have serious consequences such as antibiotic treatment, hospitalization, intensive care unit treatment, and death, and also reduces the effectiveness of anticancer treatment due to dose reduction and cycle delay. Therefore,G-CSF,which acts as a neutrophil growth factor, can be administered immediately after chemotherapy to increase the production rate of neutrophils and promote the efflux of mature neutrophils from the bone marrow, thereby increasing the absolute neutrophil count. Guidelines for the use of G-CSF published by the NCCN indicate that primary prophylaxis with G-CSF has clinical benefit for patients receiving anticancer drug therapy with a risk of febrile neutropenia greater than 20%. For those at 10-20% risk, consider primary prophylaxis based on risk factors. The frequency of neutropenic fever with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, which is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, was 5.4% in a prospective study of patients receiving high-dose regimens, but 42.5% of patients received prophylactic G-CSF, and 63.0% of patients received prophylactic G-CSF compared to 3.0% when given as postoperative adjuvant therapy demonstrating the need for G-CSF administration.In a retrospective study in Japan, a modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy regimen without pegylated G-CSF was associated with a 23% incidence of neutropenic fever and 61.5% grade 3-4 neutropenia, while prophylactic administration of pegylated G-CSF was associated with zero neutropenic fever and grade 3-4 neutropenia and longer survival .A retrospective study from Korea also reported that prophylactic G-CSF administration reduced neutropenic fever from 18.5% to 1.8% and Grade 3-4 neutropenia from 55.6% to 31.6 in pancreatic cancer patients receiving FOLFIRINOX .Pegteograstim (Neulapeg®) is a pegylated human recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with a long half-life (15-80 hours) compared to filgrastim (3-4 hours). Although several studies have demonstrated that G-CSF primary prophylaxis reduces the frequency of hematologic toxicities, particularly febrile neutropenia, during chemotherapy, it has not been prospectively studied whether primary prophylaxis reduces the frequency of grade 3-4 neutropenia and neutropenic fever in the modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy regimen in patients with pancreatic cancer. Therefore, this study is designed to determine if prophylactic administration of NEURAPEC reduces the frequency of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and neutropenic fever in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
This is a prospective, pilot study from a single center. Patients will be evaluated and operated on by one of five surgeons with a subspeciality in hepato-biliary and pancreatic surgery. After thorough, standard of care assessment for both pancreatic primary and liver metastases resectability with blood tumor markers (CEA, CA 19-9 and CA-125), triphasic CT-scan and liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma primary and three or less resectable liver metastases will be prospectively included in the study. PET-scan may be added to the investigation depending on CT-scan or MRI results to prove metastatic disease or rule out extrahepatic metastases. Patients will receive a total of 12 cycles of perioperative FOLFIRINOX (FFX), with first reassessment with triphasic CT-scan to monitor tumor response after the first six cycles. Every patient will receive at least 6 cycles of FFX before surgery. The remaining six cycles will be received either preoperatively or postoperatively, depending on patient tolerance and tumor response at reassessment. Patients with liver metastases only visible on MRI will also have liver MRI at reassessment, which is also standard of care. Patients with evidence of tumor response on both imaging using RECIST V.1.1 criteria (stable disease or partial response), and blood tumor markers (≥ 80% decrease and/or normalization of all tumor markers) will then undergo pancreatic resection, either distal pancreatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy depending on tumor side, with liver metastases excision. Each case will be followed with blood tumor markers and CT-scan every three months for two years, and every four months afterwards or until recurrence, which is standard of care for patients with metastatic PDAC. For patients without evidence of tumor response on imaging, or < 80% decrease of all tumor markers, the standard palliative systemic treatment will be continued.
The aim of this single center, single arm and prospective study is to explore the safety and efficacy of Oncolytic virus Plus Anti-PD1 and Chemotherapy as Preoperative therapy for Patients with Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
In recent years total pancreatectomy is increasingly performed in selected patients due to the increasing use of preoperative chemotherapy, making more patients operable. After total pancreatectomy, all patients develop insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Glucose control in these patients is challenging due to the complete absence of both pancreatic insulin and glucagon secretion, and most patients report decreased quality of life due to fear of hypoglycemic events and the need for continuous glucose monitoring. The CE marked bihormonal artificial pancreas (BIHAP) provides continuous fully automatic glucose monitoring and administration of insulin and glucagon using a self-learning algorithm. In a recent pilot study (APPEL5+, NL.8871) the BIHAP was being compared to current diabetes treatment in 10 patients after total pancreatectomy. This trial demonstrated that treatment with BIHAP was safe and improved time spent in euglycemia significantly during one week treatment (78.30%, [IQR 71.05%-82.61%] vs. 57.38% [IQR 52.38%-81.35%], p=0.03). Now, larger randomized studies with a longer treatment period are necessary to confirm safety and efficacy of BIHAP for the treatment of diabetes in patients after total pancreatectomy, with sufficient attention for long-term glycemic control (HbA1c) and patient-reported outcomes. The PANORAMA trial will evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month treatment with BIHAP in 40 patients after total pancreatectomy as compared to a 3-month treatment period with current diabetes care in a randomized cross-over trial. Patients will be randomized to start with the BIHAP (after a training period) or current diabetes care (i.e. insulin pen or pump). Hereafter, all patients will cross over.