Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05828394
Other study ID # PER-ECL-2021-07
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 15, 2023
Est. completion date May 7, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A single blinded randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the influence of palatal harvesting technique on post-operatory patient pain perception. The participants will be selected between subjects in need of at least one mucogingival procedure involving the harvesting of a connective tissue graft and then randomly allocated in the following groups. Two harvesting techniques were chosen to be compared: de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG).


Description:

To evaluate the postoperative pain, patients were instructed to complete a 100-mm VAS and classify the level of pain experienced on the palatal site from 0 to 10, with 10 being the worst pain ever experience. Analgesics intake (AI): Post-operative pain was indirectly evaluated on the basis of the mean mg consumption of analgesics (ibuprofene). Post operative complications (PC): To evaluate the excessive bleeding., patients were instructed to complete a 100-mm VAS and classify the level of bleeding experienced on the palatal site from 0 to 10. Dimensions of the needed graft (GD0): (x0=length, y0=height, z0=thickness) it will be measured once prepared the recipient site. Dimensions of the harvested graft (GD1): (x1=length, y1=height, z1=thickness) it will be measured with a calliper calibrated in mm just after the harvesting. Surgical time (T): time required from harvesting the graft till the suture of the donor site. Intra surgical complications (IP): perforations of the palatal flap (in the case of the SCTG) and arterial bleeding will be registered and counted as intra-surgical complications. The following parameters will be calculated: Palatal volume changes (V changes): Volumetric differences between the intraoral scans of baseline and at every following recall will be assessed with the aim of software (Geomagic by 3d systems). Superimposing the STL files using the teeth as fixed reference points will allow to measure differences in volume changes. Graft dimensions accuracy (GDA): It will be assessed comparing GD0, the needed dimensions of the graft (x0=length, y0= height, z0= thickness) with GD1, the actual dimensions of the harvested graft (x1=length, y1= height, z1= thickness). Mean baseline thickness of the palatal soft tissues (mT0): It will be measured superimposing the cbct with the intraoral scan at baseline. The measurements will be performed using a implant planning software. Mean final thickness of the palatal soft tissues (mT1): It will be measured superimposing the cbct with the intraoral scan at 12 weeks. The measurements will be performed using a implant planning.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 32
Est. completion date May 7, 2024
Est. primary completion date May 7, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with at least 18 years - Systemically healthy - Healthy periodontium or demonstrating stable periodontal condition following conventional periodontal therapy - Full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) of < 15% - Non-smokers or smokers of = 10 cigarettes per day - Indication of mucogingival surgery in teeth and/or implants. Exclusion Criteria: - Smokers = 10 cigarettes per day - General contraindications for surgery - Medications known to affect the gingiva or interfere with wound healing - Pregnancy - Benzodiazepines and/or analgesics intake - Patients nos systemically healthy or uncontrolled (i.e: Diabetes, inmunosuppresed)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
DFGG
Depithelised free gingival graft harvesting technique
SCTG
Subepithelial connective tissue graft harvesting technique

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain International University of Catalunya Barcelona
Spain Universidad Internacional de Catalunya Sant Cugat Del Vallès Barcelona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Volumetric changes during wound healing Volumetric differences of the harvested site between baseline (prior to the intervention) and every following recall will be assessed. Intraoral scans will be registered at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks after the intervention during healing. The results will be elaborated superimposing the STL files registered at very time points using Geomagic software (3d systems). The software will output a descriptive statistics: mean volumetric difference, Minimum, Maximum, Variance. At baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks after the intervention
Secondary Patients pain perception To evaluate the postoperative pain, patients were instructed to to fill a questionnaire at every time point. The questionnaire consisted of a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) describing the level of pain experienced on the palatal site from 0 to 10, with 10 being the worst pain ever experience, and 0 no pain. At baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks after the intervention
Secondary Analgesics Intake Post-operative pain was indirectly evaluated on the basis of the mean mg (milligrams) consumption of analgesics (ibuprofene). At baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks after the intervention
Secondary Histological Analysis Tissue samples (1 × 1 × 5 mm) harvested will be fixed in buffered 4% formaldehyde overnight. After a routine preparation for paraffin embedment including tissue immersion in a series of alcohol baths at different concentrations, the specimens will be sectioned (3 µm) with a Rotatory Microtome CUT4062 and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The obtained sections will be examined using a Leica DMR microscope and photographed with a Leica DFC 320 digital camera. The histo-morphometrical analysis will be conducted using an image processing software with the assessment of total area of the sample (TAS), area of epithelium (AE), area of lamina propria (ALP), area of submucosa (ASM), and the average epithelium thickness (ET) measured in three different locations in each sample. During surgery
Secondary Immunohistoquemical Analysis of S100 protein S100 protein is characteristic of nervous tissues cells. This analysis aim to compare the subjective pain perception of other outcomes with the quantity of nervous cells found in the graft. Sections will be cut, dewaxed and rehydrated. Antibodies, along with their dilutions and sources. For antigen retrieval, heat treatments will be applied (95°C, 8 min in cell conditioning solution 1 for Glut1, calretinin and S100, and cell conditioning solution 2 for Map2) prior to the primary antibody reactions. A Tris-based buffer solution (pH 7.6 ± 0.2) was used. After UV inhibition, primary antibody reactions will be performed, in addition to counterstaining with haematoxylin. Neurone specific enolase staining will be performed. The immuno-histoquemical analysis will be conducted using an image processing software with the assessment of total area of the sample in order to count ganglia and neurons in an area of up to five high power fields in relation to it. During surgery
Secondary Graft dimension accuracy Graft dimensions accuracy (GDA): It will be assessed comparing GD0, the needed dimensions of the graft (x0=length, y0= height, z0= thickness), registered in advanced, with GD1, the actual dimensions of the harvested graft (x1=length, y1= height, z1= thickness). During surgery
Secondary post-srugical pain the following questions, both assessed at every recall. (1) Did you take any more painkillers due to the palatal pain since the procedure was completed? (2) If necessary, would you repeat the palatal harvesting procedure? (3) Did you have any unexpected post-operative incidence? Whenever the patient stopped to take analgesics the measurement of this outcome will be interrupted. Being answered by yes or no. At baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks after the intervention
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06118177 - Ultrasonographic Assessment of Palatal Wound Healing
Recruiting NCT04168125 - Use of Tilapia Skin for Palate Repair and Protection After Graft Removal Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05927714 - Palatal Donor Site Wound Healing Following Periodontal Plastic Surgery Using Amnion-Chorion Membrane N/A
Recruiting NCT05191082 - Manufacturing, Characterization and Evaluation of the Effect of Silk Fibroin Membranes, Loaded or Not With Neurotensins on Open Wounds in the Palate N/A
Recruiting NCT05819632 - Clinical Comparison of Application of Curcumin Gel in Pain Management After Free Gingival Graft Harvesting N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03895476 - To Measure Pain Perception Following De-Epithelized Free Gingival Graft Harvesting N/A
Completed NCT05841641 - Laser Bandage and Surgical Stent as Palatal Donor Site Dressing After Free Gingival Graft Surgery. N/A
Recruiting NCT05171400 - A New Drug Delivery System - Silk Fibroin Film Loaded or Not With Insulin on Palatal Mucosa Wound Healing N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05690100 - Evaluation of the Use of Ozone Gel Versus Hyaluronic Acid Gel on Palatal Wound Healing . N/A
Completed NCT03567148 - The Effectiveness of Different Methods for Healing a Palatal Donor Site N/A
Completed NCT06242314 - L-PRF Versus A-PRF on Palatal Wound Healing N/A
Completed NCT03584906 - Comparison of Graft Quality and Patient Morbidity Following Palatal Harvesting. N/A
Recruiting NCT06408792 - To Evaluate Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life After Taking a Deephethelized Gingival Graft and Covering it With Different Treatments N/A