Pain Perception Following Computer-Controlled vs. Conventional Dental Anesthesia

Pain Perception Clinical Trial

Official title:

Pain Perception Following Computer-Controlled vs. Conventional Dental Anesthesia: Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05192902
• Other study ID #: CCLA
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 1, 2019
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: University of Giessen
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This single-blind two-arm randomized control trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the pain perception during and following administration of dental local anaesthesia using two different systems; i.e. computer-controlled (CCLA) and conventional.

Description:

The administration of local anaesthesia (LA) is associated with pain, fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled LA (CCLA) aims to control the administration speed and reduce pain, fear and anxiety. This randomised control trial (RCT) aims to compare the pain perception after CCLA and conventional LA, and it uses dental students as both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as an additional operator of the LA.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: June 30, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Dental students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Giessen enrolled in the course of Local Anaesthesia.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain Perception

Intervention

Device:
• Computer-controlled Local Anaesthesia (CCLA)
The computer-controlled local anesthetic injector Calaject®, (Rønvig Dental MFG, Daugaard, Denmark), which is designed to reduce the pain of performing local anaesthesia. The principle of this device is based on the fact that the less pressure and flow of a local anaesthetic injection, the less painful will be the procedure. Each device has an installed pressure sensor as well as a three-button display that allows choosing the most appropriate program in terms of different speeds and pressure. According to the anaesthesia technique, the manufacture recommends program I for intraligamentary and palatally injections, program II for infiltration and III for alveolar nerve block techniques. Conventional carpules and needles can be used in a pen-shaped part connecting to the main unit. The administration of the anaesthetic can be achieved using a foot control pedal which is adapted to the main unit, the speed of injection is related to acoustic signals.
• Conventional Local Anaesthesia
Conventional dental local anaesthetic injections.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	University of Giessen	Gießen	Hessen

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Giessen

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Pain on Puncture (PoP)	Self-reported pain intensity on puncture using visual analogue scale (0 = no pain- 10 = the worse pain)	Within 2 hours
Primary	Pain during Delivery (PdD)	Self-reported pain intensity during delivery of the anaesthetic solution sing visual analogue scale (0 = no pain- 10 = the worse pain)	Within 2 hours
Secondary	Dental Anxiety (DA)	Assessed by the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS)- Four questions survey with five possible answers. Each answer has a score: a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, d = 4, e = 5 Total possible = 20. Anxiety rating: 9 - 12 = moderate anxiety/ 13 - 14 = high anxiety/ 15 - 20 = severe anxiety	Within 2 hours