Clinical Trials Logo

Pain, Chronic clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pain, Chronic.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05280223 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Dexmedetomidine Versus Hyalase Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Start date: April 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common peripheral entrapment neuropathy, this study aims to investigate if, and to what extent hydro-dissection hyalase and saline versus dexmedetomidine upon the median nerve could offer symptoms and clinical improvement

NCT ID: NCT05277038 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Clonidine is Better Than Zopiclone for Insomnia Treatment in Chronic Pain Patients

Start date: March 1, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

A prospective observational crossover study of 160 consenting adult patients who underwent pain management. For insomnia treatment, each patient ingested different prescribed doses of Zopiclone or Clonidine on alternate nights. Each patient used a special validated sleep diary to collect data including pain score, sleep scores, sleep duration, sleep medication dose, and adverse effects. Each patient completed the diary for 3 continuous weeks. Pain was measured using the numeric pain rating scale. Sleep score was measured using the Likert sleep scale. A change in the pain or sleep scores by 2-points was considered significant.

NCT ID: NCT05260918 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Examining the Effects of Float-REST for Recovery in Individuals With Chronic Lower Back Pain

Start date: February 24, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Researchers at the West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute are looking for volunteers to participate in a research study to evaluate what effects Float-REST (Restricted environmental Stimulation Technique) has on the stress response caused by chronic lower back pain.

NCT ID: NCT05254470 Completed - Back Pain Clinical Trials

Real-World Experience of Patients Treated for Musculoskeletal Injuries With SAM in Routine Care

Start date: September 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to evaluate continuous ultrasound treatment with diclofenac coupling patch during routine care of musculoskeletal injuries which failed conservative treatment to better understand clinical utilization of the treatment on types of injuries, how the treatment helps patients (pain, function and quality of life), and information on healthcare provider ordering the therapy and general workflow. Low-intensity continuous ultrasound (LICUS) is a bio regenerative technology used when normal rehabilitation is insufficient, applied with a wearable device (SAM, Zetroz Systems LLC) for daily use. The treatment provides long-duration ultrasound for approximately four hours. The objective of this study is to examine the real-world outcome data on symptoms improvement and return to function using SAM during routine care.

NCT ID: NCT05253950 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Technology on the Occurrence of Muscoskeletal Disorders in Students

Start date: February 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

To investgate the long use of electronic devices that forces the person to adopt an uncomfortable posture which leads to the appearance of musculoskeletal disorders such as neck pain, thoracic pain, back pain and tendonitis of the upper extremities due to writing messages and especially when the person uses only one hand.

NCT ID: NCT05247892 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy Guided S1 Injections and Radiofrequency

Start date: February 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators aim to compare the effect of ultrasound versus floroscopy guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of S1 in patients with a chronic lumbosacral radicular pain.

NCT ID: NCT05235308 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Predictive Factors on the Results of Epidural Adhesiolysis in Patient With Chronic Spinal Pain

Start date: February 15, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The primary aim of this exploratory study was to determine the demographic, clinical, and technical factors associated with treatment outcome, to create a better select treatment candidates.

NCT ID: NCT05235295 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Fluoroscopic vs Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Injection

Start date: April 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular sacroiliac joint injection under fluoroscopy versus ultrasound guidance

NCT ID: NCT05152654 Completed - Pain, Acute Clinical Trials

Is it Necessary to Fix Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernias are one of the most common diseases in general surgery practice. In a multicenter study conducted in Germany, inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations. Until the last 20 years, after Lichtenstein described tension-free mesh hernia repair, this method was the gold standard in inguinal hernia surgery. This method was advantageous in terms of both less recurrence and less postoperative pain compared to tension methods. With the development of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic hernia surgery was first described by Dr. Ger in 1992. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is based on the principles of preperitoneal repair described by Stoppa in open surgery. Its advantages over laparoscopic surgery are; Less post-operative pain, rapid recovery, reduction in nerve damage and chronic pain, and reduced recurrence rate. However, the disadvantage is that the learning curve is longer and higher cost. Two commonly used laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgeries are Trans Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) methods. Although both are preperitoneal repair methods, less intraperitoneal organ damage, less intra-abdominal adhesion formation, and no need for peritoneal sheath repair are the advantages of the TEP method. For this reason, TEP method has been the preferred method today. Various methods have been tried in order not to change the location of the mesh placed in the TEP method. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia is one of the most debated issues. The most common methods for fixation are tacker, tissue adhesive, or suturing the mesh. However, fixing the mesh using a tacker can cause chronic pain. Tissue adhesives are not preferred because tissue adhesives have high costs and sometimes cause allergic reactions. The method in which the mesh is sewn to the pubic bone is avoided by surgeons because it prolongs the operation time. To avoid chronic pain after surgery, the idea was not to fix the mesh. The major drawback of this method is that the mesh may slip and cause recurrence.This study aimed to reveal the difference between the amount of migration and the amount of post-operative pain between detecting the mesh and not detecting it

NCT ID: NCT05062993 Completed - Pain, Chronic Clinical Trials

Evaluation of the Effect of Caudal Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency Stimulation on Chronic Pain

Start date: February 22, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Postlumbar surgery syndrome (PLSS; failed back syndrome) is characterized by persistent pain in the lower back or lower extremities after spinal surgery. It occurs in 10-40% of patients who undergo a back surgery. The recently introduced pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) technique is widely used to provide relief from chronic pain and studies have shown that PRF stimulation can be used to control neuropathic pain by placing the needle electrodes into the caudal epidural space The aim of this study is evaluation of the effect of ultrasound guided caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency stimulation in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain due to postlumbar surgery syndrome.