Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04677985 |
Other study ID # |
20192544 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
May 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2019 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2020 |
Source |
Memorial University of Newfoundland |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Background: Both health professionals and consumers use menthol-based topical analgesics
extensively for the temporary relief of pain from musculoskeletal ailments or injury.
However, there are no reports of differences in the pain pressure threshold (PPT) or the
relative effectiveness of topical analgesics to reduce pain in the upper and lower body
muscles and tendons. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate whether
differences existed in PPT and relative pain attenuation associated with a menthol based
topical analgesic over a variety of upper and lower body muscles and tendons. Design:
Randomized allocation, controlled, intervention study. Method: Sixteen participants (10
females and 6 males), who were tested on their dominant or non-dominant side. The order of
specific muscle / tendon testing was also randomized, which included upper body (middle
deltoid, biceps brachii, and lateral epicondylar tendon) and lower body locations
(quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, lumbo-sacral erector spinae muscles, and patellar and
Achilles tendons). PPT was monitored before and 15-minutes following the application of a
menthol based topical analgesic.
Description:
Experimental Design Using random allocation (slip of paper chosen from a box by one of the
researchers), participants were either tested on their dominant or non-dominant side. Limb
dominance was determined by the participants' self-report of the preferred hand used for
writing/throwing (upper extremity) and for kicking a ball (lower extremity). Further,
randomization was used to determine which muscle groups would be tested first: upper body
versus lower body, and the order of muscle testing. The tested upper body limb muscles
consisted of the middle deltoid, and biceps brachii. The lower body muscle groups consisted
of the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius. In order to compare sensitivity differences
between muscles and tendons, the patellar tendon, and Achilles tendon were also tested. In
addition, as tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis/epicondylosis) is a common injury [40], the
lateral epicondylar tendon was also evaluated. The lower back was tested using the
lumbo-sacral erector spinae muscles.
The pre-testing consisted of obtaining PPT (without topical analgesic application) using a
handheld algometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Test Systemâ„¢, Model 01163, Lafayette Instrument
Company, Indiana, USA), from each muscle or tendon. The algometer was a hand-held muscle
tester with a range of 0-300 pounds (136.1 kilograms) that consisted of a padded disc with a
surface area of 1.7 cm2 attached to a microprocessor-control unit that measures peak force
(pounds or kilograms). The unit has a digital readout for peak-applied pressure and provides
a built-in calibration routine that verifies a valid calibration. The pain threshold was
defined as the minimum pressure that induced pain [15]. Participants were instructed to
provide a verbal report as soon as the quality of sensation changed from pressure to pain
[15,16] at which point the algometer was removed. This study chose to measure the PPT via a
pressure algometer as it has been shown to be a clinically and experimentally reliable method
to assess pain [16,23,35]. The middle of the muscle belly for the biceps brachii, middle
deltoid, hamstrings (biceps femoris), quadriceps (rectus femoris), and gastrocnemius was
used. The measurement sites for the patella tendon and lateral epicondylar tendon were 1 cm
distal from the bony origin. For the Achilles tendon, the measurement was taken at one third
of the distance of the tendon length distal to its insertion. There were three readings from
each testing position with a 5-second rest period between each reading.
Intervention The intervention involved the application of 4% menthol-based Biofreeze®
(Performance Health, Akron, Ohio) to the muscles and tendons immediately following the
pre-testing. Based on prior recommendations [22,45,32] varying volumes of the topical
analgesic were applied in reference to the surface area of the muscle. The previously cited
investigators recommended 1ml per 200 cm2 of muscle surface area. No significant force (light
stroking actions to apply the analgesic) was used for the application of the menthol-based
topical analgesic.