View clinical trials related to Overactive Bladder Syndrome.
Filter by:The main aim of this study, is compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous posterior nerve stimulation in patients with overactive bladder.
To assess the impact of mirabegron versus solifenacin on psychological distress, sexual function, bladder wall thickness and bladder blood flow.
Bladder pain and urgency are common after bladder surgery. The objective is to determine if transdermal administration is superior to oral administration in alleviating pain and urgency.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of kinesio tape application on bladder symptoms and quality of life in women with overactive bladder (OAB).
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) bladder injections are a highly effective treatment for overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence. The procedure is typically performed in the office setting with one of two medications to control comfort. However, the effectiveness of these medications has never been compared. The goal of this study is to determine which medication is better at providing comfort during bladder Botox® injections.
Urinary frequency urgency and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) are commonly encountered in patients after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) or transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP). Antimuscarinics has been widely used to treat OAB and around 70% of patients can improve symptoms after treatment. Beta-3 adrenoceptor agonist (mirabegron) can also decrease DO and improve OAB symptoms. Combination treatment of solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg was more effective than mirabegron 50mg alone, but with more anticholinergic side effects. However, there has been no clinical trial to compare which drug provides more benefit to decrease the OAB symptom severity immediately after TURP. This study tries to compare the safety and therapeutic efficacy between solifenacin and mirabegron in men with BPH and having OAB symptoms immediately after TURP. This study was designed as a prospective, randomized trial to compare the safety and efficacy of OAB medication on the decrease of overactive bladder symptoms score (OABSS) and urgency severity score (USS) between solifenacin 5mg QD and mirabegron 50mg QD in men with BPH undergoing TURP. A total of 130 male patients with BPH and undergo TURP or TUIP will be enrolled. The primary end point is the change of USS from baseline to 4 weeks after catheter removal and starting OAB medication. Secondary end-points include the changes of OABSS, frequency episodes, urgency episodes, UUI episodes in the 3-day voiding diary, maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume and PVR, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life index (QoL-I) from baseline to 2 weeks and 4 weeks. We expect that patients receiving solifenacin and mirabegron might have similar therapeutic effects on decrease of USS, but patients who received mirabegron might have less adverse events such as dry mouth or difficulty in urination.
This study is designed to evaluate whether bilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation is more effective than unilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation at treating overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence
This experiment is expected to understand the benefits of different settings of electrical stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder.
Urodynamic examination evaluates storage and empting phases of the urinary bladder. It enables the clinician to correlate physiologic findings to patients' complains. The data gathered during the examination divided to storage and empting. During the storage phase, bladder sensation is measured while the bladder is filled with sterile water. During years of practice, we noticed that early sensation (bladder over-sensitivity) is occasionally associated with bladder outlet obstruction (as demonstrated in the emptying phase of the examination.
Rationale: The overactive bladder syndrome is diagnosed clinically by using the ICS criteria of ≥8 micturitions and at least 1 urgency episode per 24 hours. To determine whether patients fit the criteria, micturition diaries ('sensation-related bladder diaries') and other symptom questionnaires with considerable limitations are used. This makes it difficult to get a good impression of the fluctuation of complaints during the day / week. These limitations are overcome using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). This is an electronic questioning method which is characterized by repeated and random, momentary assessments in the subject's current environment and state. This study follows other successful ESM studies done within the Gastroenterology and Psychiatry Department. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the ESM is more accurate in the assessment of urological complaints in OAB compared to the current assessment with the use of the sensations-related bladder diaries (SR-BDs) and retrospective questionnaires. Furthermore the aim is to assess the reliability and validity of this OAB-specific electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePRO), based on the Experience Sampling Method-principle, for symptom assessment and assessment of triggers for symptoms in OAB. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the ESM to assess urological complaints in OAB compared to SR-BDs and retrospective questionnaires. To assess content validity, reliability and the accuracy to validate the developed ePRO in OAB patients. Study design: The ESM study is a multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study. Study population: 66 OAB patients will be recruited at the outpatient Pelvic Care Centre in Maastricht UMC+, Zuyderland Hospital and University Hospital Antwerp, 66 healthy volunteers will be recruited as well. Methods: In a period of 7 days, participants will fill out an electronic ESM assessment at 10 random moments during the day. Moreover, they will fill out a sensation-related bladder diary (SR-BD) during the last three consecutive days of filling out the ESM and several symptom questionnaires at the end of the study period. Main study endpoints: The main study outcome comprehends the psychometric properties of the PROM for symptom assessment of OAB symptoms. Secondary outcomes are increase in ESM score for OAB symptoms and environmental and psychosocial factors (e.g. as measured by the PROM) from one time point (t-1) to the next (t).