Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05166668 |
Other study ID # |
12/2021OBSGN 1 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 1, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2021 |
Source |
Menoufia University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The aim of this study To compare the clinical and laboratory outcomes of two ovarian
stimulation protocols (standard GnRH antagonist protocol and aromatase inhibitor/ antagonist
protocol) in women (40-44) years undergoing ICSI cycle.
Description:
Fertility is known to decline significantly in women after the age of 35 years, and fecundity
is almost completely lost after the age of 45 . As age increases the natural fecundity and
pregnancy rates after assisted reproduction decrease .This reduction in fecundity is thought
to be due to ovarian aging mainly, which is defined as a decline in both the quantity and
quality of the ovarian follicle pool .The increase in patient's age is associated with poor
ovarian response, as represented by smaller ovarian volume, lower antral follicle count and
poor stromal vascularity. In addition to the reduction in fecundity, there is an increase in
spontaneous abortion rates in this group of women .It has been reported that about 19% of all
women undergo ART are 40 years, and they could be considered as expected poor responders
.Various protocols of ovarian stimulation have been proposed to optimize IVF results in this
age group, however, satisfactory results remain a challenge . The lack of initial central
down-regulation in early follicular phase and adequate prevention of premature luteinizing
hormone (LH) surge in late follicular phase provide GnRH antagonist protocol as a potentially
proper option .The use of aromatase inhibitors in a GnRH antagonist protocol was suggested by
some studies [Mit. Yarali and colleagues demonstrated that adjuvant therapy with letrozole
could improve the response [Yarali et al., 2009]. Meanwhile, in another study, adding
letrozole to ovarian stimulation has no positive effect on the likelihood of pregnancy .
Letrozole is a selective, non-steroidal third generation aromatase inhibitor. Letrozole
causes a reduction in conversion of androstenedione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol
by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme activity . According to some published studies, the
decline in early follicular phase estrogen levels, and consequently decrease in negative
feedback of estrogen on FSH release in hypothalamic-pituitary axis cause an increase in
endogenous gonadotropin secretion and stimulation of ovarian follicular growth. In addition,
an increase in intraovarian androgens secondary to aromatase inhibition, augments the
follicular sensitivity to FSH stimulation and follicular growth . Letrozole has no
antiestrogenic effect over the endometrium . These reports prompted us to hypothesize that
use of letrozole as a co-treatment agent in GnRH antagonist protocol might enhance cycle
outcomes.
I