Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effect of Dietary Energy Restriction on Reversing Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose: A Proof of Concept Study
This study aims to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of a low-calorie diet (LCD) intervention in addressing the underlying pathophysiological abnormalities and improving fasting hyperglycemia among individuals with i-IFG. Additionally, it seeks to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the LCD intervention.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 34 |
Est. completion date | February 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 35 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 35 to 65 years 2. Overweight (body mass index (BMI) =25 to <29 kg/m² or =23 to <29 kg/m2 if Asian descent) or Obese (BMI =30 kg/m²) 3. Physically inactive (<150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity or <75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity physical activity) 4. Prediabetes diagnosis or score =5 on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) risk tool Exclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes 2. Cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, heart failure, or other cardiac conditions) 3. Chronic kidney disease 4. Chronic liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis) 5. Cancers 6. Acute inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, celiac disease, chronic pancreatitis, or other disorders potentially causing malabsorption 7. Food allergies 8. Participation in weight loss programs in the past six months 9. Currently following a specific diet (e.g., ketogenic diet, Mediterranean diet) 10. Participation in any exercise programs in the past six months 11. Currently taking weight-loss medications or drugs known to affect glycemia (steroids and antipsychotics) 12. Previous bariatric surgery or plan to have bariatric surgery during the study period 13. Planning to relocate during the study period 14. Intending to fast during the study period for religious or other reasons 15. Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study period 16. Breastfeeding |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Emory University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Weight in kg | Weight will be measured using a digital weighing scale (Welch Ally-Scale-Tronix, NY, USA) with an accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Primary | Fasting plasma glucose in mg/dl | Will be analyzed by enzymatic assays | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Primary | Indices of ß-cell function | Will be assessed using the Insulinogenic index (IGI) | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Primary | Indices of ß-cell function | Will be assessed using the Oral disposition index (DIo) | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Primary | Indices of ß-cell function | Will be assessed using the Homeostatic model assessment of ß-cell function (HOMA-B) | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Primary | Indices of hepatic insulin resistance | Will be assessed using the Hepatic insulin resistance index (HIRI) | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Primary | Alanine aminotransferase (liver enzyme) in U/L | Will be analyzed with colorimetric assays | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Response rate | Response rate is defined as the proportion of individuals responding to the invitation sent via the Epic database. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Screening yield | Screening yield: Proportion of screened individuals meeting eligibility criteria. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Enrollment rate | Enrollment rate: Proportion of eligible individuals who enroll in the study. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Resource utilization | Resource utilization: Assessment of expenditures and staff time. | Throughout the study period, an average of 10 weeks | |
Secondary | Retention rate | Retention rate: Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the study. | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Intervention acceptability | Intervention acceptability will be assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire. Scores range from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate better acceptability among participants. | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Feasibility of intervention | Will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure questionnaire. Scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better feasibility among participants. | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Intervention appropriateness | Will be assessed with the Intervention Appropriateness Measure questionnaire. Scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better appropriateness among participants. | 4 and 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Facilitators, barriers, acceptability, satisfaction, and participant experiences with the the intervention | Qualitative in-depth interviews | 4 and 8 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06143345 -
HIIT in Isolated IFG: A Proof-of-Concept Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00140647 -
The Study of Atherosclerosis With Ramipril and Rosiglitazone
|
Phase 3 |