Predicting Survival After Surgical Resection for the Entire Spectrum of Anatomically Resectable HCC

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resectable Clinical Trial

Official title:

Predicting Survival After Surgical Resection for the Entire Spectrum of Anatomically Resectable HCC: a Metroticket Approach

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06294808
• Other study ID #: 2017-2601
• Status: Completed
• Start date: July 17, 2017
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: National Cancer Centre, Singapore
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical outcomes after surgical resection in HCC is a continuum and is clearly related to tumor burden but needs better definition. The researchers describe the use of the "metro ticket" approach to analyze surgical outcomes over the whole spectrum of anatomically resectable HCC to define overall survival including intermediate stage tumors (BCLC B). The analysis the researchers provide in this study enables the clinician to select the optimal surgical resection candidate based on robust long term survival data. In addition, study compares outcome for open surgery vs laparoscopic surgery, survival outcome for viral and non-viral HCC using Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) for more comprehensive study result.

Description:

Patients who underwent surgical resection (both open surgery and laparoscopic surgery) for HCC from 1st January 2000 to 30th June 2018 by the joint hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery service at the Singapore Healthcare Group of Hospitals (Singapore General Hospital and the National Cancer Centre Singapore) were retrospectively identified from a prospectively kept institutional database. The assessment of the size, number of nodules and vascular invasion of HCC were based on pre-operative CT/MRI imaging and pathological assessment of the resected specimens. All resections were histologically confirmed as HCC. Patients with macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic invasion were excluded from analysis as were patients resected for other palliative intents (e.g. ruptured HCC).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 1043
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: June 30, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Unequivocal diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) by histology

2. Patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who underwent liver resection for other malignancies ie cholangiocarcinoma

2. Patients with HCC who did not undergo liver resection.

3. Patients with HCC who underwent liver transplant.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
• Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resectable

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Singapore	National Cancer Centre, Singapore	Singapore
Singapore	Singapore General Hospital	Singapore

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
National Cancer Centre, Singapore	Singapore General Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Singapore, 

References & Publications (30)

Bruix J, Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199. No abstract available. — View Citation

Chang WT, Kao WY, Chau GY, Su CW, Lei HJ, Wu JC, Hsia CY, Lui WY, King KL, Lee SD. Hepatic resection can provide long-term survival of patients with non-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: extending the indication for resection? Surgery. 2012 Nov;152(5):809-20. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.03.024. Epub 2012 Jul 3. — View Citation

Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16. — View Citation

Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4. — View Citation

European Association For The Study Of The Liver; European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012 Apr;56(4):908-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Hepatol. 2012 Jun;56(6):1430. — View Citation

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. — View Citation

Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1245-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0. Epub 2012 Feb 20. — View Citation

Freeman RB, Mithoefer A, Ruthazer R, Nguyen K, Schore A, Harper A, Edwards E. Optimizing staging for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: A retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database. Liver Transpl. 2006 Oct;12(10):1504-11. doi: 10.1002/lt.20847. — View Citation

Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, Takahashi M, Inoue Y, Sano K, Imamura H, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Neither multiple tumors nor portal hypertension are surgical contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008 Jun;134(7):1908-16. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.091. Epub 2008 Mar 8. — View Citation

Khor AY, Toh Y, Allen JC, Ng DC, Kao YH, Zhu G, Choo SP, Lo RH, Tay KH, Teo JY, Goh BK, Burgmans MC, Irani FG, Goh AS, Chow PK. Survival and pattern of tumor progression with yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization in predominantly hepatitis B Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 2014 Jul;8(3):395-404. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9533-9. Epub 2014 Apr 5. — View Citation

Lim KC, Chow PK, Allen JC, Siddiqui FJ, Chan ES, Tan SB. Systematic review of outcomes of liver resection for early hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1622-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8915. Epub 2012 Sep 28. — View Citation

Lin CT, Hsu KF, Chen TW, Yu JC, Chan DC, Yu CY, Hsieh TY, Fan HL, Kuo SM, Chung KP, Hsieh CB. Comparing hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma: change for treatment of choice? World J Surg. 2010 Sep;34(9):2155-61. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0598-x. — View Citation

Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):429-42. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047. — View Citation

Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, Bhoori S, Schiavo M, Mariani L, Camerini T, Roayaie S, Schwartz ME, Grazi GL, Adam R, Neuhaus P, Salizzoni M, Bruix J, Forner A, De Carlis L, Cillo U, Burroughs AK, Troisi R, Rossi M, Gerunda GE, Lerut J, Belghiti J, Boin I, Gugenheim J, Rochling F, Van Hoek B, Majno P; Metroticket Investigator Study Group. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70284-5. Epub 2008 Dec 4. — View Citation

Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, Montalto F, Ammatuna M, Morabito A, Gennari L. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 14;334(11):693-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341104. — View Citation

Nagano Y, Tanaka K, Togo S, Matsuo K, Kunisaki C, Sugita M, Morioka D, Miura Y, Kubota T, Endo I, Sekido H, Shimada H. Efficacy of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 10 cm. World J Surg. 2005 Jan;29(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7509-y. — View Citation

Ng KK, Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Lauwers GY, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J, Ikai I, Yamaoka Y, Curley SA, Nagorney DM, Ng IO, Fan ST, Poon RT; International Cooperative Study Group on Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 May;12(5):364-73. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Mar 31. — View Citation

O'Malley ME, Takayama Y, Sherman M. Outcome of small (10-20 mm) arterial phase-enhancing nodules seen on triphasic liver CT in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;100(7):1523-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41814.x. — View Citation

Oliveri RS, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD004787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004787.pub2. — View Citation

Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, Chen PJ, Lin SM, Yoshida H, Kudo M, Lee JM, Choi BI, Poon RT, Shiina S, Cheng AL, Jia JD, Obi S, Han KH, Jafri W, Chow P, Lim SG, Chawla YK, Budihusodo U, Gani RA, Lesmana CR, Putranto TA, Liaw YF, Sarin SK. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 2010 Mar 18;4(2):439-74. doi: 10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7. — View Citation

Peng ZW, Guo RP, Zhang YJ, Lin XJ, Chen MS, Lau WY. Hepatic resection versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Cancer. 2012 Oct 1;118(19):4725-36. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26561. Epub 2012 Feb 22. — View Citation

Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Selection criteria for hepatic resection in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm in diameter. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 May;194(5):592-602. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01163-8. — View Citation

Sangro B, Inarrairaegui M, Bilbao JI. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012 Feb;56(2):464-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Aug 2. — View Citation

Shah SA, Tan JC, McGilvray ID, Cattral MS, Cleary SP, Levy GA, Greig PD, Grant DR. Accuracy of staging as a predictor for recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation. 2006 Jun 27;81(12):1633-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000226069.66819.7e. — View Citation

Torzilli G, Belghiti J, Kokudo N, Takayama T, Capussotti L, Nuzzo G, Vauthey JN, Choti MA, De Santibanes E, Donadon M, Morenghi E, Makuuchi M. A snapshot of the effective indications and results of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in tertiary referral centers: is it adherent to the EASL/AASLD recommendations?: an observational study of the HCC East-West study group. Ann Surg. 2013 May;257(5):929-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828329b8. — View Citation

Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, Aishima S, Tsuijita E, Morita K, Kayashima H, Maehara Y. Outcomes of hepatic resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (>/= 10 cm in diameter). J Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;104(3):292-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.21931. Epub 2011 Apr 4. — View Citation

Yang LY, Fang F, Ou DP, Wu W, Zeng ZJ, Wu F. Solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma: a specific subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma with good outcome after hepatic resection. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):118-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181904988. — View Citation

Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Watson JJ, Bacchetti P, Venook A, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001 Jun;33(6):1394-403. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563. — View Citation

Yeh CN, Lee WC, Chen MF. Hepatic resection and prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm: two decades of experience at Chang Gung memorial hospital. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Nov;10(9):1070-6. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.03.072. — View Citation

Zhong JH, Ke Y, Gong WF, Xiang BD, Ma L, Ye XP, Peng T, Xie GS, Li LQ. Hepatic resection associated with good survival for selected patients with intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):329-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000236. — View Citation

* Note: There are 30 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	5-year mortality.	Time between the respective surgery to the time of death. Bivariate contour plots of 5-year survival probability as a function of X = AFP concentration (ng/mL) and Y = tumor burden index (size of largest nodule + 2*number of nodules) (TBI) were obtained as smoothed contours originating from an empirically-derived bivariate 5-year survival distribution S(X,Y)=1- F(x =X,y =Y). The function F(x =X,y =Y) is the empirical, bivariate cumulative distribution of 5-year mortality as a function of X and Y defined over the domain (0	At least 5 years.
Primary	Concordance of pre-operative radiological and post operative surgical specimen.	The metro ticket modeling was based on tumour size and number of nodules extracted at pre-operative radiological imaging and post surgical pathology assessment. Continuous variables are summarized as mean, standard deviation, 25th and 75th percentiles, median and minimum and maximum. Categorical variables are summarized as counts (N) and percentages (%).	Through study completion, an average of 3 years.
Primary	Agreement between TBI calculated from pre-operative imaging versus those obtained from post-surgical pathological assessment.	Bland-Altman analysis, which is based on a simple but effective graphical approach for evaluating bias and for calculating bounds on the expected magnitude of the individual differences arising between the two measurement methods, is used. A 45° line of identity with scatter plot was produced to display the correlation between the 2 measurements. Bias was evaluated by calculating (d) ¯ the mean difference of the measurements. Limits of agreement, calculated as (d) ¯ ±2sd , where sd is the standard deviation of the individual differences, defined bounds within which 95% of the measurement differences are expected to fall. The B-A plot defines the limits of agreements. B-A analysis is performed using TBI over a wide range, 0 = TBI = 30, and a restricted range focusing on small tumors, 0 < TBI = 6.	Through study completion, an average of 3 years.