Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06286124
Other study ID # 8612
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date April 2024
Est. completion date April 2028

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source Erasmus Medical Center
Contact Lucas Visscher, BSC
Phone +310107043683
Email l.visscher.1@erasmusmc.nl
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the functioning of the abdominal wall in patients who underwent hybrid (open- and laparoscopic) incisional hernia repair. The main objective is to assess the anatomical restoration and function of the linea alba one year after surgery by ultrasonography and mean peak torque during trunk flexion using a BioDex machine.


Description:

Rationale: Abdominal wall functioning has been reported to be higher in patients that underwent open incisional hernia repair compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. With the use of a recently developed hybrid approach, we aim for a functional anatomical restoration of the linea alba while also achieving the technical advantages of the hybrid approach. Objective: The main objective is to asses functional anatomical restoration of the linea alba through functioning in mean peak torque, and ultrasound examination. Study design: Multicentre prospective cohort study. Study population: Adult patients with a midline incisional hernia ≥4 cm and ≤10 cm. Intervention: Not applicable. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary objective of this study is to assess anatomical restoration and function of the linea alba one year after surgery by ultrasonography and measuring the mean peak torque during trunk flexion using a BioDex(trademark) machine. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: No risk is associated with participation other than known complications for incisional hernia repair. HYDRA is part of standard care in the Alrijne Hospital, and the technique has previously been published. The mesh used in this study is being used on a world-wide scale. We do not expect additional risks with this study. As participants have to visit the Erasmus Medical Center (Erasmus MC) an additional three times and have to fill in additional questionnaires, there is a burden for enrolled patients.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date April 2028
Est. primary completion date April 2027
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years or older - Scheduled for elective HYDRA-surgery - Midline incisional hernia larger than 4 centimetres in mean width - Sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language to be able to understand and fill in the questionnaires - Signed informed consent form by patient Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant at inclusion - Inclusion in other trials with interference of the primary and secondary endpoints - American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA Classification) > 3 - Hernia defect larger than 10 centimetres in mean width - Incarcerated hernias or emergency procedure - Unable to perform a trunk flexion - Incapacitated patients

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Hybrid Surgery
Hybrid incisional hernia repair, as described by Van den Dop et al. (2021)

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Alrijne Hospital Leiden

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Erasmus Medical Center Alrijne Hospital, Medtronic

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

References & Publications (1)

van den Dop LM, de Smet GHJ, Bus MPA, Lange JF, Koch SMP, Hueting WE. A new three-step hybrid approach is a safe procedure for incisional hernia: early experiences with a single centre retrospective cohort. Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1693-1701. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02300-9. Epub 2020 Sep 12. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean peak torque 1 year The functioning of the abdominal wall in Nm/kg as assessed by a BioDex 12 months
Secondary Mean peak torque 2 years The functioning of the abdominal wall in Nm/kg as assessed by a BioDex 24 months
Secondary Recurrent Incisional Hernia Ultrasonography examination of the abdominal wall for the detection of a recurrent incisional hernia. 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Severity of surgical complications Through Clavien-Dindo classification 1 month
Secondary Surgical complications Type of complication will be recorded as a free-text field 1 month
Secondary General Quality of Life Measure quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey, a 36-question questionnaire pre-operative, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Mesh specific Quality of Life The Carolina Comfort Scale, which is a mesh-specific quality of life questionnaire, will be used in order to assess satisfaction with the placed mesh. 1 month, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Scar satisfaction Visual Analogue Scale for the how satisfied patients are with the new scar from the surgery, reaching from 0 to 10. pre-operative, 1 day, 1 month
Secondary Pain in the abdominal region Visual Analogue Scale for pain in the region of the hernia reaching from 0 to 10. pre-operative, 1 day, 1 month
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05424484 - Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line to Limit the Rate of Incisional Hernia Occurrence N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06195332 - Open vs. Endoscopic Transversus Abdominis Release Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04808063 - Algorithm for Prophylactic Mesh Use in Emergency Laparotomy. N/A
Recruiting NCT04358159 - RCT Ventralex vs Onlay Mesh in Incisional Hernias N/A
Completed NCT05351970 - Barbed Suture for Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure
Completed NCT04166201 - Double Mesh Modification of Incisional Hernia Can be Effective Without Severe Local Complications N/A
Recruiting NCT05528107 - Laparoscopic IPOM Plus vs. eTEP Trial N/A