Open Versus Arthroscopic Assisted Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption Using Suture Button Device

Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Open Versus Arthroscopic Assisted Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption Using Suture Button Device

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06019260
• Other study ID #: Acute AC Joint disruption
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: June 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: February 2024
• Source: Assiut University
• Contact: Mohamed Adel abdelmajeed, residant
• Phone: 01121650557
• Email: mohamedadel[@]med.aun.edu.eg
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Compare the clinical and radiological outcome between the arthroscopic and open surgical repair using suture button device method in cases with acute AC joint disruption

Description:

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common shoulder injury, especially among athletes and has an estimated incidence of 17% of all shoulder injuries and30%-50% of athletic shoulder injuries ,In most cases, these are caused by a direct fall on the ipsilateral shoulder tip. The indirect mechanism of injury with an extended arm is rare, The Rockwood classification system is currently used and based on the degree and direction of the disrupted anatomy of the AC joint. Despite the high prevalence of this injury, there is no consensus about its optimal treatment. A variety of surgical procedures are described in the literature, such as an augmented suture with absorbable materials, stabilization with Kirschner (K)-wires in combination with or without additional wire loops, hook plates, or the Bosworth screw, but none can be considered the gold standard of operative AC joint stabilization, another treatment option was offered by the Tight Rope system, This technique was developed as a minimally invasive procedure in the management of AC dislocations. Because of its minimally invasive approach, it reduces soft tissue damage and yields better cosmetic results.9 Also, there is no need for reoperation to remove the hardware that might screws, or plates. Moreover, the complications of hardware failure, like breakage, dislocations, or bone fractures, are minimized

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 54
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: September 1, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 16 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age of 16 to 60 years
• Definite radiographic diagnosis of isolated Rockwood type IIIb(unstable), IV and type v acromioclavicular joint dislocation
• Time from injury to operation < 3 weeks
• Patient with complete at least 12-month follow-up assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

• . Age outside the range
• Open injury, old injury (= 3 weeks since injury)
• Injury caused by other diseases (tendinitis, metabolic, et al.), concurrent shoulder osteoarthritis, arthropathy or any fracture
• Any previous operation of the injured limb
• Incomplete data or follow-up < 12 months

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Assiut University

References & Publications (5)

Bezruchenko S, Dolhopolov O, Yarova M, Luchko R, Mazevych V. Clinical Evaluation and Instrumental Diagnostics in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2022 Feb 28;24(1):1-12. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.7800. — View Citation

Jeong JY, Chun YM. Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 Sep 1;23(3):159-165. doi: 10.5397/cise.2020.00150. eCollection 2020 Sep. — View Citation

Liu X, Huangfu X, Zhao J. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by coracoclavicular ligament augmentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 May;23(5):1460-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2800-9. Epub 2013 Dec 10. — View Citation

Lu D, Wang T, Hong JJ, Chen H, Sun LJ. Acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with tightrope : Mini-open versus percutaneous stabilization. Acta Orthop Belg. 2019 Dec;85(4):406-411. — View Citation

Vijayan S, Kulkarni MS, Jain CP, Shetty S, Aroor MN, Rao SK. Bifocal Stabilisation of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation using Suture Anchor and Temporary K-Wires: A Retrospective Analysis. Malays Orthop J. 2022 Nov;16(3):104-112. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.016. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Radiological evaluation using the true anteroposterior view of the shoulder	Radiological evaluation using the true anteroposterior view of the shoulder and AC projection (10 cephalic tilt with the beam centered over the AC joint)	preoperative, three month postoperative and six month postoperative