Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05844969
Other study ID # CMOP
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date July 17, 2023
Est. completion date December 2023

Study information

Verified date September 2023
Source Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
Contact Marie F Zielinski
Phone +49 4471 850 3326
Email marie.zielinski@ippmed.de
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this non-interventional, retrospective data analysis is to validate the circle method for patients with bicuspid aortic heart valves undergoing transcatheter aortic heart valve implantation (TAVI). The main aims are: - to assess whether patients with bicuspid aortic valves that received a TAVI suffered from fewer complications - if valve size was identical to the one determined using the circle method compared to - a case where circle method derived valve size is different from the actually implanted valve - to develop recommendations on how to size the valve using the circle method.


Description:

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common heart valve abnormality and is associated with a number of cardiac complications, including infective endocarditis, aortic dissection, aortic dilatation, and the development of severe aortic stenosis (AS). Due to its anatomical characteristics BAV has been considered a contraindication to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a standard treatment of AS. However, several recent trials have presented promising results indicating TAVI to be a safe alternative to surgery for low risk patients and more patients with BAV have been considered for TAVI. There are several sizing techniques for TAVI in BAV, including an annular sizing, a supra-annular sizing, and a balloon sizing, yet there is still no consensus on the most appropriate technique. Although annular sizing remains the major approach in most patients with BAV, some BAV anatomies may profit from the supra-annular sizing. Recently published consensus for sizing and positioning the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (THV) in BAV describes the anatomical features that influence sizing optimization. The novel circle technique has also been proposed in the presence of the unique anatomical factors and sizing at the supra-annular level. This method is particularly helpful for visually identifying anatomic features, indicating the sealing zone at the commissures, visually reassuring of the size and position, and treating patients with large annuli. Currently, there are limited data validating the circle method for identifying sizing and positioning for TAVI in BAV patients. In this non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter international data collection and analysis we aim to validate the circle method for sizing and positioning in bicuspid aortic valves. Due to the non-interventional character of the project, no additional burden will be put on the patients eligible for inclusion.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date December 2023
Est. primary completion date December 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with bicuspid aortic valves who underwent aortic valve replacement with a balloon expandable valve (SAPIEN 3 / Ultra) - Computed Tomography data available Exclusion Criteria: - none

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Padova Padova

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin Edwards Lifesciences

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Complications To assess whether patients with bicuspid aortic valves that received a SAPIEN 3 / Ultra THV suffered from fewer complications
if valve size was identical to the one determined using the circle method compared to
a case where circle method derived valve size is different from the actually implanted valve
12 months
Secondary Sizing with Circle Method To develop recommendations on how to size the valve using the circle method. 12 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05511792 - Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) vs Standard Sizing Strategy TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0) N/A
Recruiting NCT04722796 - HANGZHOU Solution in Bicuspid AS Undergoing TAVR N/A