CST1-Guided Oral Glucocorticoids Management for CRSwNP

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Clinical Trial

— COMPASS  

Official title:

Efficacy of CST1-Guided Oral Glucocorticoid Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05598411
• Other study ID #: TR-COMPASS
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: October 17, 2022
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: October 2022
• Source: Beijing Tongren Hospital
• Contact: Lou Zhang
• Phone: +86-13910830399
• Email: dr.luozhang[@]139.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Topical and systemic steroids constitute the first choice in medical treatment for nasal polyps. Glucocorticoids sensitivity is significantly correlated with CST1 in nasal secretions. The goal of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is to clarify the efficacy of a short course of CST1-guided oral glucocorticoids therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Subjects were randomized to receive either oral glucocorticoids or oral placebo for 2 weeks. Endoscopic polyp score, Total Nasal Symptom Score(TNSS), SNOT-22 score, Cystatin 1 and other biomarkers were evaluated before and after the treatment. Researchers will compare oral glucocorticoids group and oral placebo group to test CST1 predictive model of glucocorticoid therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 90
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 30, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 70 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18-70 years old;

2. All meet the diagnostic criteria of CRSwNP in EPOS2020;

3. Investigator-assessed endoscopic bilateral Nasal Polyp Size Score (NPSS) was greater than or equal to 4 (minimum score of 2 per nasal cavity);

4. Patients with asthma were in a stable state, with FEV1 > 50% of the predicted value or 50% of the optimal value of personal FEV1; (5) Good compliance, able to complete clinical observation.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Medication history of oral glucocorticoids within 3 months before enrollment, antibiotics within 2 weeks;

2. Oral glucocorticoid contraindications, such as diabetes, femoral head necrosis, gastric ulcer, etc.;

3. Any nasal and/or sinus surgery within 3 months before enrollment;

4. Patients have conditions or comorbidities that may preclude evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint, such as: unilateral posterior nasal polyp of maxillary sinus, acute rhinitis, nasal infection or upper respiratory tract at the screening period or within 2 weeks before the screening period infection, acute asthma attack within 4 weeks, current drug-induced rhinitis, allergic fungal sinusitis (AFRS), benign or malignant tumor of nasal cavity;

5. Important clinical comorbidities that may interfere with clinical effectiveness, including but not limited to: active upper or lower respiratory tract infection, cystic fibrosis, eosinophilic granuloma with polyvasculitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's granulomatosis), Young's syndrome, etc.;

6. Accompanying serious diseases or recurrent chronic diseases with poor systemic control, such as (but not limited to), active infection, cardiovascular disease, tuberculosis or other pathogen infection, diabetes, autoimmune disease, HIV, hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or parasitic diseases, malignant tumors, etc.;

7. Subjects with severe liver and kidney function injury; such as, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times the upper limit of normal, serum creatinine > the upper limit of normal value;

8. Known or suspected immunosuppression, including a history of invasive opportunistic infections (such as tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pulmonary cysts, aspergillosis), even if the infection has subsided;

9. Women who were pregnant or planned to become pregnant during the study, or who were breastfeeding;

10. Subjects who were fertile but were reluctant to use medically approved and effective contraception;

11. Those with a history of alcohol or drug abuse;

12. Those who believed the patient had other medical or non-medical conditions that were not suitable for the study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
• Glucocorticoids
• Nasal Polyps
• Polyps

Intervention

Drug:
• Oral Glucocorticoids
methylprednisolone 24mg qd, 2-week duration
• Oral placebo
oral placebo 24mg qd, 2-week duration

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University	Beijing	Beijing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Beijing Tongren Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The change in endoscopic polyp score	Bilateral polyp volume size described using the Nasal Polyp Size Score (NPSS) score. (0 - 4 points per side: 0 = no polyp; 1 = small polyp in the middle meatus, not reaching the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = small polyp in the middle meatus, reaching the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyp protruding from the middle meatus, not reaching the inferior border of the inferior turbinate; 4 = large polyp that almost causes most or complete obstruction of the nasal cavity.)	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change in Total Nasal Symptom Score(TNSS)	Total Nasal Symptom Score was are graded on a 3-point scale. (0= no symptoms; 1= mild symptoms; 2= moderate symptoms; 3= severe symptoms).	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change in SNOT-22 score	The 22-item Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) was used to evaluate the changes in symptoms of patients. According to the severity of symptoms caused by RCRS, each item was divided into 6 levels: no distress (0 points), mild distress (1 point), mild distress (2 points) ), moderate distress (3 points), severe distress (4 points), very severe distress (5 points). The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms, and the final total score of the item is counted.	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change in asthma ACQ Score	For patients with asthma, we assessed the change of asthma symptoms through the Asthma Control Questionnaire(ACQ). Each question was scored on a scale of 0 to 6 according to the severity. The result score of each item was averaged. A score of <0.75 indicated that the asthma had been completely controlled; a score of 0.75-1.5 indicates well-controlled asthma; a score of >1.5 indicates that asthma is not controlled.	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change of CST1	The change of Cystatin 1	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change of biomarker	Changes in expression levels of biomarker in nasal brush exfoliated cells, nasal secretions and nasal microbes.	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change in AE / SAE recording	Any adverse event	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The needs of upgrading treatment	The needs of upgrading treatment includes surgery, oral glucocorticoids or monoclonal antibodies treatment.	Baseline, week 2, week 6, week 10, week 14, week 18, week 22, week 26
Secondary	The change of inflammatory cell	The change of inflammatory cell in nasal polyps	Baseline, week 2, week 26