Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Controlled, Randomized Double-blind Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05227300
• Other study ID #: 11447
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: February 14, 2022
• Est. completion date: May 31, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: March 2022
• Source: Indiana University
• Contact: Kenneth Spolnik, DDS
• Phone: 317-274-7280
• Email: kspolnik[@]iu.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether one type of anesthetic (numbing medicine) will work better at numbing the nerve in a tooth than using a different type of anesthetic. A second purpose is to see if the time needed to numb the nerve in a tooth is different between the two anesthetics.

Description:

40 subjects with a mandibular molar diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be randomly allocated into 2 groups. One group will receive a total of 3 cartridges of a standard, unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine via inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) followed by supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations, while the other will receive the equivalent yet buffered formulation. An electronic pulp tester (EPT) will be used to objectively determine baseline pulpal status of the affected tooth, followed by 2-minute interval testing following the administration of all local anesthesia. The onset of pulpal anesthesia is defined by the first of 2 consecutive EPT=80 readings, and the endodontic treatment may begin. Profound pulpal anesthesia is ultimately determined if the patients report a comfortable pulpotomy as reflected on the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: May 31, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: May 31, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria - In order to participate, subjects must:

• Be between the ages of 18 and 80 years old
• Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation
• Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II)
• Not be pregnant
• Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported)
• Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours)
• Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data
• Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study

Exclusion Criteria - No subjects will have:

• A negative response to cold in the proposed treatment tooth
• A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pulpitis
• Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Intervention

Drug:
• Onset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution
Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic
• 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Indiana University School of Dentistry Graduate Endodontics Dept.	Indianapolis	Indiana

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Indiana University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (7)

Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. — View Citation

Fowler S, Reader A. Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):970-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 16. — View Citation

Goodis HE, Poon A, Hargreaves KM. Tissue pH and temperature regulate pulpal nociceptors. J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1046-9. — View Citation

Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2. — View Citation

Rosenberg PA, Amin KG, Zibari Y, Lin LM. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):403-5. Epub 2007 Feb 20. — View Citation

Saatchi M, Farhad AR, Shenasa N, Haghighi SK. Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buccal Infiltration on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6. — View Citation

Schellenberg J, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M. Effect of Buffered 4% Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Apr 1. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Profoundness of pulpal anesthesia	Number of Participants who demonstrate profound pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (maximum stimulation)	Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration
Secondary	Onset of pulpal anesthesia	Duration of time required to achieve pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (maximum stimulation)	Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration