Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations: 3-year Results of a Randomized Double-blind Trial
This study was designed to evaluate and compare the 3-year periodontal responses and clinical performance of proximal subgingival open sandwich restorations using three different glass ionomer-based restorative materials and flowable composite.
The description of the experimental design followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. The present study was a double-blinded (patients and examiner) randomized clinical trial anticipating the parallel design. Ninety-five adult patients seeking dental treatment in the Operative Department clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Mansoura were enrolled in the current study with a total of 120 Class II restorations. No advertisement was made for participant recruitment, forming a sample of convenience. Each patient must signs a consent form before participating in the current study. The study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2023 as a part of the Doctoral dissertation. Mansoura University institution's ethics committee approved the form and protocol before conducting the study. The sample size was calculated based on the clinical success rate (100% success rate at 2 years) of posterior class II restorations restored with open sandwich and deep margin elevation techniques observed in previous studies. According to several parameters including a significance level of 5%, the power of the test was calculated to be 80%, and equivalent limit of 15%. Upon these data, a sample size of 120 subjects was appropriate to allow for a 20% drop-out. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03244124 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04630587 -
Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03657862 -
Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03645551 -
Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate Veneers
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04838483 -
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03933176 -
Absence of Liner Following the Selective Caries Removal (ALFSCaRe)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03343184 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06392685 -
Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03517124 -
Ceramic Tooth Restorations - a Comparison Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06456619 -
CAD-CAM or Adhesive Approaches for MIH Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03515265 -
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03283280 -
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02572570 -
Clinical Investigation of a New Bulk Fill Composite Resin in the Restoration of Posterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06164418 -
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04293770 -
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06183320 -
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04306549 -
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05551130 -
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03924830 -
Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02948686 -
Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities
|
N/A |