Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) has been deemed "a safe and well-tolerated procedure but its efficacy for the treatment of ED is doubtful and deserves more investigation" by the European Society of Sexual Medicine. In a similar manner, the Sexual Medicine Society of North America and American Urological Association have put forth guideline statements recommending additional investigation of this treatment modality.2 The current clinical armamentarium only treats the symptoms of erectile dysfunction without improving upon the underlying pathophysiology. LiSWT has been used effectively in musculoskeletal disorders and cardiovascular applications. Animal studies have shown improvements in angiogenesis and stem cell recruitment in other systems (cardiac and musculoskeletal) using shockwave therapy. It has been used to treat erectile dysfunction since 2010 and is widely used in Europe and throughout the world. It is gaining widespread acceptance in the United States with a relative paucity of data in regards to its effectiveness. While the majority of studies and meta-analyses show improvements in standardized erectile dysfunction questionnaires (IIEF/SHIM-Sexual Health Inventory in Men, International Index of Erectile Function-5) the durability remains unknown and many have lacked a sham-arm. In addition, many studies have failed to assess a population of men who have highly prevalent erectile dysfunction, those men undergoing prostate cancer treatment. This is a prospective, randomized, single blind, sham-controlled clinical study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) on symptomatic ED patients in three distinct patient populations. LiSWT has shown the potential to improve baseline erectile function but requires further study, which is the aim of this investigation.


Clinical Trial Description

It is estimated that about 1 in 10 adult males suffer from erectile dysfunction (ED) on a long-term basis. Oral therapies, including PDE5I, may be considered first-line therapies for the majority of patients with ED because of potential benefits and lack of invasiveness. This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled clinical study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy on symptomatic ED patients in three distinct patient populations. The first arm of the study will be those men with erectile dysfunction as defined by IIEF score (International Index of Erectile Function-5). These men will either have PDE5i refractory or responsive erectile dysfunction. Subjects will receive either Sham treatment (no ultrasound energy delivered via a Sham probe) or LiSWT for erectile dysfunction. Follow up will occur at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months following the end of treatment. Effectiveness will be measured by change in IIEF/SHIM (IIEF/SHIM-Sexual Health Inventory in Men, International Index of Erectile Function-5) score and EHS (Erection Hardness Score) score. The Sexual Health Inventory in Men (also referred to as International Index of Erectile Function-5) is scored as follows: 22-25 No erectile dysfunction 17-21 Mild erectile dysfunction 12-16 Mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction 8-11 Moderate erectile dysfunction 5-7 Severe erectile dysfunction The patient responds to the following questions: Instructions Each question has 5 possible responses. Circle the number that best describes your own situation. Select only 1 answer for each question. Over the past 6 months: 1. How do you rate your confidence that you could keep an erection? Very low (1), Low (2), Moderate (3), High (4), Very high (5) 2. When you had erections with sexual stimulation, how often were your erections hard enough for penetration (entering your partner)? Almost never or never (1), A few times (much less than half the time) (2), Sometimes (About half the time) (3), Most times (much more than half the time) (4), Almost always or always (5) 3. During sexual intercourse, how often were you able to maintain your erection after you had penetrated (entered) your partner? Almost never or never (1), A few times (much less than half the time) (2), Sometimes (About half the time) (3), Most times (much more than half the time) (4), Almost always or always (5) 4. During sexual intercourse, how difficult was it to maintain your erection to completion of intercourse? Extremely difficult (1), Very difficult (2), Difficult (3), Slightly difficult (4), Not difficult (5) 5. When you attempted sexual intercourse, how often was it satisfactory for you? Almost never or never (1), A few times (much less than half the time) (2), Sometimes (About half the time) (3), Most times (much more than half the time) (4), Almost always or always (5) An increase or decrease from baseline indicates improving or worsening erectile function. The Erection Hardness score is another tool to evaluate erectile function and firmness. It is scored as follows: 0-Penis does not enlarge 1. Penis is larger, but not hard 2. Penis is hard, but not hard enough for penetration 3. Penis is hard enough for penetration, but not completely hard 4. Penis is completely hard and fully rigid These patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either the Sham or active treatment groups in which a device called Duolith by Storz will be used to deliver shockwaves to the penile tissue. The Duolith device is FDA-approved for treatment of musculoskeletal disorders including plantar fasciitis but has more recently been investigated in erectile dysfunction in both the United States and abroad. The Duolith device is used to deliver low intensity shockwaves to the penile tissue. LiSWT (Linear Shockwave Therapy) utilizes energy in the ultrasonic range. The focused energy, when applied to tissue, has been postulated to improve stem cell recruitment and promote angiogenesis. This has been demonstrated in animal modes. The second population of patients will be those who are planning to undergo treatment for prostate cancer. In a similar manner, men will be randomized to either the Sham or active treatment groups. Men will be treated prior to undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer to assess the effectiveness in LiSWT as a means of erectile preservation prior to prostate cancer treatment. The third population of patients will be those who have undergone treatment for prostate cancer. The investigators will compare IIEF scores and EHS scores in men who have undergone prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Again, there will be a sham and treatment group. In addition to assessing the efficacy of LiSWT in these populations of men, the study aims also to substantiate the safety profile of the Duolith device. Safety is to be assessed by the frequency of side effects during treatment, as well as the occurrence of anticipated and unanticipated adverse events during and from treatment up to follow-ups. The average and standard deviation of all relevant variables, including demographic and baseline characteristics, primary and secondary outcomes will be calculated. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Erectile Dysfunction
  • Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency
  • Erectile Dysfunction Due to General Medical Condition
  • Erectile Dysfunction Following Radiation Therapy
  • Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

NCT number NCT04434352
Study type Interventional
Source University of Virginia
Contact
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date June 1, 2020
Completion date January 9, 2025

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05366504 - LiST Plus PRP Injection Therapy vs LiST Monotherapy for ED Treatment Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT02573805 - the Diagnostic Value of Rigiscan Test (Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity, NPTR) in Chinese Males N/A
Recruiting NCT02745808 - Injectable Collagen Scaffold™ Combined With HUC-MSCs for the Improvement of Erectile Function in Men With Diabetes Phase 1
Withdrawn NCT02579148 - Collagen Scaffolds Loaded With HUCMSCs for the Improvement of Erectile Function in Men With Diabetes Phase 1
Withdrawn NCT01967251 - Efficacy, Safety and Dose-response of Udenafil in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02225548 - Sagene 2014 - Parkinson's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction Phase 4
Completed NCT02587988 - Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HCP1302 Phase 3
Completed NCT01937871 - A Study of Tadalafil in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Phase 3
Completed NCT02945462 - Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Phase 1
Completed NCT01698684 - Research Evaluating a PDE5 Inhibitor for Erectile Dysfunction Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT01321489 - A Study to Evaluate a Possible Superiority Expressed by the Faster Onset of Action and the Efficacy and Safety of Sildenafil Citrate 20mg Sublingual Tablet in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction of Different Etiologies Phase 3
Completed NCT01230541 - Effect of Udenafil on Spermatogenesis Phase 1
Terminated NCT01262833 - Pudendal Assessment in Erectile Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT02226237 - Effectiveness of Physiotherapy to Treat the Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction Post Retropubic Prostatectomy N/A
Completed NCT01037244 - Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction I Phase 3
Completed NCT01037218 - Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction II Phase 3
Recruiting NCT00313898 - Effect of Sildenafil on Quality of Sexual Life in Mild to Normally Sexually Functioning Males Phase 4
Completed NCT00421083 - Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction Caused by Spinal Cord Injury Phase 3
Completed NCT00663728 - Assessment of Duration of Erection With Vardenafil 10 mg Phase 4
Completed NCT00667979 - Evaluating the Efficacy of Vardenafil in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Administered 12, 18 or 24 Hours Prior to Intercourse Phase 4