Caudal Analgesia for Lumosacral Spine Surgeries Clinical Trial
Official title:
Caudal Epidural With Non Opioid Adjuvants in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery
| NCT number | NCT04411329 |
| Other study ID # | R15/2020 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | June 6, 2020 |
| Est. completion date | May 6, 2021 |
| Verified date | May 2021 |
| Source | Ain Shams University |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Lumbosacral spine surgeries are accompanied with severe postoperative pain which has a negative effect on patients' recovery. Preemptive analgesia before lumbosacral spine surgeries should be implemented to prevent CNS plasticity and to provide effective pain relief. The most common way to provide pain management after spine surgery is the intravenous analgesia. Caudal epidural analgesia can be a highly effective method for postoperative pain relief. The most common way to provide pain management after spine surgery is the intravenous analgesia. Caudal epidural analgesia can be a highly effective method for postoperative pain relief. acting drugs last from 4-8 hours,But this can be prolonged by adding non opioid adjuvants like steroid( dexamethazone,betamethasone), alpha2 agonists (clonidine, dexmedetomidine), or their combination. This study will compare adding different non opioid adjuvants to bupivacaine in caudal epidural for preventive analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery which can be a part of multimodal analgesia protocol. .
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 60 |
| Est. completion date | May 6, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | May 6, 2021 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients are aged from 18-65 years , ASA I and II, scheduled for lumbar spine surgery (laminectomy, discectomy, foraminotomy, fenestration or fusion) in a virgin back. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with multiple level fixation, revision surgery, complicated spinal canal stenosis, traumatic lumbar surgeries were excluded, patients with addiction, allergy to local anesthetics or to any drug used in the study and those with coagulation abnormality are also excluded from the study. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | Ainshams hospitals | Cairo | |
| Egypt | Sanaa Farag Mahmoud | Cairo | New Cairo |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Ain Shams University |
Egypt,
Barham G, Hilton A. Caudal epidurals: the accuracy of blind needle placement and the value of a confirmatory epidurogram. Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1479-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1469-8. Epub 2010 May 29. — View Citation
Solanki SL, Bharti N, Batra YK, Jain A, Kumar P, Nikhar SA. The analgesic effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine or clonidine, with bupivacaine, in trauma patients undergoing lower limb surgery: a randomised, double-blind study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Jan;41(1):51-6. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The duration of analgesia | time from second dose caudal epidural block to first analgesic requirement | postoerative 24 hours. | |
| Secondary | postoperative pain | VAS score from zero for (no pain) till 10 for ( the most severe intractable pain) | postoperative 24 hours |