Fasting Versus Non-Fasting for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (FastCIED Study)

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Clinical Trial

Official title: Fasting Versus Non-Fasting for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (FastCIED Study)

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

There was no evidence to suggest that a shortened fluid fast results in an increased risk of aspiration, regurgitation or related morbidity compared with the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' fasting policy. However, there is no available data regarding the safety and efficacy of fasting approach in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a non-fasting protocol is non-inferior in regard to safety to a fasting protocol (current practice) in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation procedures

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

• NCT number: NCT04389697
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Leipzig Heart Institute GmbH
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 29, 2020
• Completion date: December 6, 2020