Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04382430
Other study ID # STUDY00145717
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 28, 2020
Est. completion date June 6, 2021

Study information

Verified date September 2021
Source University of Kansas Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the learning curve associated with Ultrasound (US) guided axillary vein access for cardiac device implantation based on length of procedure among operators of various levels of experience and to assess the 30-day complication rate for patients undergoing US guided device placement versus traditional implant methods.


Description:

Ultrasound (US) guided axillary vein access for device implantation is an uncommon approach to gain venous access for cardiac device implantation - an extremely common procedure. However, there has been a growing trend of utilizing this approach to obtain venous access for device implantation among operators. Axillary vein access was described back as far as 1997, when it was utilized for contrast guided venipuncture to access the axillary vein for device implantation. Literature has suggested that an axillary venous approach, with either a superficial landmark or radiographic contrast, has better long-term efficacy and lower lead complications than a conventional subclavian approach for patients that had permanent pacemaker implantation. There are a variety of ways to access the axillary vein including contrast venography to help localization, "blind puncture" (utilizing fluoroscopy to identify anatomical landmarks), and US. More recently, operators have begun to utilize US guidance for axillary vein access. Esmaiel has described that US guidance for axillary vein access could potentially improve the success rate of venous access and limit complications. Others, albeit few, have reported US guided access for cardiac device implantation has the ability to reduce complications, is faster to complete, and easier to learn. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the United States, US guided central venous catheter placement is one of the 11 patient safety practices that have the strongest evidence supporting its use in improving patient outcomes. Evidence supports US guidance being standard of care in central venous catheter placement and using US for axillary access as helpful in cardiac device implantation, but providers still utilize predominantly alternative approaches to obtain venous access via the subclavian vein, cephalic cutdown, extrathoracic axillary using fluoroscopy and thoracic axillary using fluoroscopy. Currently, there is limited data describing outcomes, the efficiency of US guided axillary access for cardiac device implantation, and the learning curve associated with this technique. Data suggests that utilizing the US approach can improve outcomes, be more efficient, and be easier to learn. Investigators recently reported a high success (95%) and low complication rate with US guided axillary access in 187 patients. Despite this limited data, operators still largely use alternative approaches for venous access. In part, this may be due to the learning curve associated with US axillary venous access. While there is data demonstrating the utility of US guided axillary access, there is little evidence showing the learning curve for operators associated with this technique. The aim of this project is to assess the learning curve of this technique among operators of various levels of experience.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date June 6, 2021
Est. primary completion date June 6, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Sign written Informed Consent Form. - =18 years of age up to 90 years old. - Eligible and referred for cardiac device implantation. - BMI < 35. Exclusion Criteria: - Unable to sign consent. - Patient eligible for cardiac device upgrades/ extractions, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (SICD) & leadless devices.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Ultrasound guided venous access
Each physician/ provider will perform 2 assisted ultrasound (US) guided venous access and pocket creation for cardiac device implant and 10 solo ultrasound guided cardiac device implant.
Conventional technique
Physician will perform 5 cardiac device implant using conventional technique of venous access and pocket creation

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Kansas Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (8)

Esmaiel A, Hassan J, Blenkhorn F, Mardigyan V. The Use of Ultrasound to Improve Axillary Vein Access and Minimize Complications during Pacemaker Implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 May;39(5):478-82. doi: 10.1111/pace.12833. Epub 2016 Mar 23. — View Citation

Jones DG, Stiles MK, Stewart JT, Armstrong GP. Ultrasound-guided venous access for permanent pacemaker leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Aug;29(8):852-7. — View Citation

Kim KH, Park KM, Nam GB, Kim DK, Oh M, Choi H, Hong TJ, Park BM, Seo GW, Song PS, Kim DK, Seol SH, Kim DI, Kim YH, Choi KJ. Comparison of the axillary venous approach and subclavian venous approach for efficacy of permanent pacemaker implantation. 8-Year follow-up results. Circ J. 2014;78(4):865-71. Epub 2014 Mar 3. — View Citation

Liccardo M, Nocerino P, Gaia S, Ciardiello C. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary/subclavian venous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation: a randomized study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;51(2):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0313-7. Epub 2018 Jan 15. — View Citation

Lin J, Adsit G, Barnett A, Tattersall M, Field ME, Wright J. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided vascular access during cardiac implantable device placement. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;50(1):105-109. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0273-3. Epub 2017 Jul 27. — View Citation

Ramza BM, Rosenthal L, Hui R, Nsah E, Savader S, Lawrence JH, Tomaselli G, Berger R, Brinker J, Calkins H. Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Oct 1;80(7):892-6. — View Citation

Seto AH, Jolly A, Salcedo J. Ultrasound-guided venous access for pacemakers and defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):370-4. doi: 10.1111/jce.12005. Epub 2012 Nov 6. Review. — View Citation

Squara F, Tomi J, Scarlatti D, Theodore G, Moceri P, Ferrari E. Self-taught axillary vein access without venography for pacemaker implantation: prospective randomized comparison with the cephalic vein access. Europace. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):2001-2006. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw363. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Venous access time between US guided and conventional technique Assess changes in venous access and pocket creation time with progressive experience with US guided axillary venous access (learning curve). During procedure
Primary Time spent for pocket creation between US guided venous access technique and conventional technique. Compare the pocket creation time with US guided axillary venous access versus conventional techniques. During procedure
Primary Time spent to obtain venous access & pocket creation between experienced and inexperienced physicians. Compare venous access and pocket creation time amongst experienced and inexperienced physicians. During procedure
Primary To assess 30 day post procedure complications Assess 30-day complications between techniques. 30 Day post procedure
Primary Assess acute procedural success between two techniques. Compare overall procedural success whether device was successfully placed or not post procedure between US guided axillary venous access & conventional technique. Success as Assigned- whether implant technique assigned was successful or whether had to switch to an alternative technique. During procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05778279 - Role of New High Resolution Ultrasonographic Modalities for Diagnosis of Fetal Nervous System Anomalies
Completed NCT04659395 - How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block N/A
Recruiting NCT04438265 - Quadratus Lumborum Type 2 as Chronic Hip Pain Treatment
Recruiting NCT04952220 - Exploratory Study of Ultrasound Signs of Native Septic Arthritis of the Knee
Completed NCT04149041 - The Applications of Point-of-care Ultrasound in ED Unselected, Non-critical Patients
Completed NCT06000215 - Credibility of Ultrasound Detection of Female Genital Prolapse Mesh
Completed NCT04581616 - The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block and Intraoperative Intercostal Nerve Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05151432 - Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Pulsed Ultrasound in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Completed NCT04674852 - Mayo Designed Soft Tissue Ultrasound-Detectable Marker N/A
Recruiting NCT05627830 - Ultrasound Guided Versus Non-Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. N/A
Completed NCT04917406 - Effect of Iontophoresis vs. Ultrasound and Iontophoresis in Plantar Fasciitis". Plantar Fasciitis" N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04862182 - Intrapartum Ultrasound in Predicting Mode of Delivery
Completed NCT03122119 - Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Platelet Rich Plasma Injections in the Sacroiliac Joint Phase 4
Completed NCT04753450 - Correlation of Muscle Ultrasound Measures (2D and 3D) With Biphotonic X-ray Absorptiometry in Oldest Old Patients.
Completed NCT03676699 - Lung Ultrasound in Detection of Extravascular Lung Water in Septic Patients.
Recruiting NCT03144895 - Arterial Catheterization by Ultrasound N/A
Recruiting NCT05535816 - Accuracy of Ultrasound for Detecting Residual Fragments During RIRS N/A
Recruiting NCT05769517 - PREDICTION OF GERMLINE BRCA 1/2 GENES FROM HEALTHY OVARIES
Completed NCT05927285 - Effect on Kidney Function Recovery Guiding Decongestion With VExUS in Patients With Cardiorenal Syndrome 1 N/A
Recruiting NCT04828746 - Utility of Ultrasound-Guided Site Marking in Pediatric Lumbar Punctures N/A