Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish WOOS Clinical Trial
Official title:
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index
| NCT number | NCT04373681 |
| Other study ID # | Gazi Unv |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | December 4, 2017 |
| Est. completion date | March 15, 2020 |
| Verified date | April 2021 |
| Source | Gazi University |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Observational |
Various clinical scales are available to investigate shoulder diseases. Some of them, culturally adapted to the Turkish population. However, none of them are specific for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Thus, this study aimed to translate the WOOS index into Turkish and investigate its psychometric properties in the Turkish population.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 68 |
| Est. completion date | March 15, 2020 |
| Est. primary completion date | January 10, 2020 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of the shoulder osteoarthritis, to be a native Turkish speaker Exclusion Criteria: - Illiteracy, cognitive impairment, presence of shoulder circumference fractures |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turkey | Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology | Ankara | |
| Turkey | Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity, Child Health and Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology | Ankara | |
| Turkey | Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department | Ankara |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Gazi University |
Turkey,
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2002) Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. New York: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 12:1-9
Bumin G, Tüzün EH, Tonga E (2008) The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 21(1):57-62
Celik D, Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Dirican A. Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish ASES questionnaire. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(9):2184-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2183-3. Epub 2012 Aug 30. — View Citation
Çelik D. Turkish version of the modified Constant-Murley score and standardized test protocol: reliability and validity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(1):69-75. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2016.14.0354. — View Citation
Corona K, Cerciello S, Morris BJ, Visonà E, Merolla G, Porcellini G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS). J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Dec;17(4):309-313. Epub 2016 Mar 31. — View Citation
El O, Bircan C, Gulbahar S, Demiral Y, Sahin E, Baydar M, Kizil R, Griffin S, Akalin E. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Rheumatol Int. 2006 Oct;26(12):1101-8. Epub 2006 Jun 24. — View Citation
Jia ZY, Zhang C, Cui J, Xue CC, Xu WD. Translation and validation of the Simplified Chinese version of Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS). Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e8691. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008691. — View Citation
Klintberg IH, Lind K, Marlow T, Svantesson U. Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) index: a cross-cultural adaptation into Swedish, including evaluation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with subacromial pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.027. Epub 2012 Mar 21. — View Citation
Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Nov;9(8):771-8. — View Citation
Millett PJ, Gobezie R, Boykin RE. Shoulder osteoarthritis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Sep 1;78(5):605-11. — View Citation
Najafov E, Özal S, Kaptan AY, Ulucaköy C, Kanatli U, Ataoglu B, Basar S. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of LHB Score. J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Mar 4:1-7. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0364. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation
Özer M, Ataoglu MB, Çetinkaya M, Ayanoglu T, Kaptan AY, Kanatli U. Do intra-articular pathologies accompanying symptomatic acromioclavicular joint degeneration vary across age groups? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019 Apr;30(1):2-9. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2019.62431. — View Citation
Petersson CJ. Degeneration of the gleno-humeral joint. An anatomical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Apr;54(2):277-83. — View Citation
Rasmussen JV, Jakobsen J, Olsen BS, Brorson S. Translation and validation of the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index - the Danish version. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2013 Sep 18;4:49-54. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S50976. eCollection 2013. — View Citation
Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, Hess R, Miller DM, Reeve BB, Santana M. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1305-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. Epub 2011 Nov 3. Review. — View Citation
Tugay U, Tugay N, Gelecek N, Özkan M. Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 May;131(5):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1242-9. Epub 2010 Dec 30. — View Citation
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale. | patient administered, spesific to osteoarthritis of shoulder, multisectional questionnaire | 1st day | |
| Primary | Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 1900 points (worst condition) on this scale. | patient administered, spesific to osteoarthritis of shoulder, multisectional questionnaire | 2 days later | |
| Primary | The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 2100 points (worst condition) on this scale. | patient administered, spesific to rotator cuff disease, multisectional questionnaire | 1st day | |
| Primary | The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, patients get a minimum of 0 points (best condition) and a maximum of 100 points (worst condition) on this scale. | patient administered, spesific to upper limp, two sectional questionnaire | 1st day | |
| Primary | The Society of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment, patients get a minimum of 0 points (worst condition) and a maximum of 100 points (best condition) on this scale. | patient administered, spesific to upper limp, two sectional questionnaire | 1st day |