Cognitive Decline Prevention in Pre-frail Older Adults Clinical Trial
— SFLOfficial title:
StayFitLonger. Preventive Effects of a Combination of Non-drug Interventions (Physical, Cognitive and Social) in Healthy Elderly Subjects: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
| Verified date | August 2023 |
| Source | University of Lausanne Hospitals |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
Multimodal training, including physical and cognitive activities, has been associated with a reduction in age-related physical and cognitive decline. Therefore, combining these activities into a home-based computerized training program may represent a powerful approach to foster independent life at home. The StayFitLonger study is a 6-month multi-site randomized controlled, double-blind trial, which tests the efficacy of a home-based computerized intervention that combines physical and cognitive exercises through virtual coaching to enhance motivation. In Switzerland, Canada and Belgium, a total of 128 older participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two physical and cognitive home-based interventions for 6 months: StayFitLonger or active control training. The StayFitLonger intervention provides physical and cognitive training exercises, feedback and instructions through a virtual coach to optimize motivation. It also offers social and psycho-educational contents. Monthly supervision (home-visits and phone calls) will be provided during this 6-month intervention. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, and after 6 months of training. This study will demonstrate the feasibility, sustainability and efficacy of a home-based multi-domain intervention program allowing further development and possible commercialization of a scientifically validated training program to slow down cognitive and physical decline.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 120 |
| Est. completion date | August 1, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 1, 2021 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 60 Years to 100 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Fluent french speaker adults - Retired, living at home and having a wireless Internet connection in their house; - Independent for all daily activities (optimal score to the 4-IADL); - Open to the use of new technologies and electronic tablets; - Interested in exercising to stay fit; - Able to walk without a walking aid (e.g. wheelchair, sticks, walker, etc.); - Available to commit themselves for the time period during which the study takes place; - No vision deficits that would prevent them to read information on a tablet; - No current neurological or psychiatric diagnosis (e.g. Parkinson's disease). Exclusion Criteria: - MoCA score < 26; - score = 3 on the Fried's frailty index (Fried et al., 2001) |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belgium | BRUSANO (ASBL - Association Sans But Lucratif) | Bruxelles | |
| Belgium | Centre Public d'Action Sociale | Woluwe-Saint-Lambert | |
| Canada | Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal - CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal | Montréal | Quebec |
| Switzerland | Centre Leenaards de la mémoire - Centre hospitalier universitaire Vaudois | Lausanne | Vaud |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| University of Lausanne Hospitals | Active and Assisted Living Programme, BRUSANO, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal, Haute-Ecole Arc, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Mindmaze SA, Pro-Senectute Vaud, Université Catholique de Louvain |
Belgium, Canada, Switzerland,
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Effects of moderators on primary and secondary outcomes: Age | To see the influence of age on primary and secondary outcomes using 2 age groups defined by the median | Age measured within a month prior to the start of the intervention | |
| Other | Effects of moderators on primary and secondary outcomes: Sex | To see the influence of sex on primary and secondary outcomes using 2 sex groups (male and female) | Sex measured within a month prior to the start of the intervention | |
| Other | Effects of moderators on primary and secondary outcomes: Education | To see the influence of education on primary and secondary outcomes using 2 education groups (less or more than 12 years) | Education measured within a month prior to the start of the intervention | |
| Primary | Timed-Up & Go Test (TUG) | To measure lower extremity function, mobility and risk of falls | T0 (baseline) | |
| Primary | Timed-Up & Go Test (TUG) | To measure lower extremity function, mobility and risk of falls | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: Twenty-meter walking test | To measure gait speed in sec. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: Twenty-meter walking test | To measure gait speed in sec. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: Five Time Sit to Stand Test (FTSTS) | To measure lower extremity strength in sec | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: Five Time Sit to Stand Test (FTSTS) | To measure lower extremity strength in sec | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: Four Stage Balance Test (FSBT) | To measure balance. A total score of 4 is obtained when a participant performs successfully 4 positions (parallel, semi-tandem and tandem). The test is stopped when a participant fails at holding a given position for at least 10 sec. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: Four Stage Balance Test (FSBT) | To measure balance. A total score of 4 is obtained when a participant performs successfully 4 positions (parallel, semi-tandem and tandem). The test is stopped when a participant fails at holding a given position for at least 10 sec. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: motion sensors measures | During TUG and 20-m walking test, motion sensors will provide measures on: walking speed, variability in gait, stance phase, foot-flat phase, double support, stride velocity, maximal swing speed, turning angle and variability in toe clearance. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Physical domain: motion sensors measures | During TUG and 20-m walking test, motion sensors will provide measures on: walking speed, variability in gait, stance phase, foot-flat phase, double support, stride velocity, maximal swing speed, turning angle and variability in toe clearance. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Global cognition composite score | This score is the ZAVEN composite score computed by averaging z-scores from:
Total recall of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and delayed recall of the WMS-IV Logical Memory to measure episodic memory; WAIS-IV Digit Symbol substitution Test (DSST) to measure complex attention; Verbal fluency (VF) to measure executive functions. |
T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Global cognition composite score | This score is the ZAVEN composite score computed by averaging z-scores from:
Total recall of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and delayed recall of the WMS-IV Logical Memory to measure episodic memory; WAIS-IV Digit Symbol substitution Test (DSST) to measure complex attention; Verbal fluency (VF) to measure executive functions. |
T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Memory composite score | This score is computed by averaging z-scores from:
Delayed recall of the CVLT; Delayed recall of the WMS-IV Logical Memory Test. |
T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Memory composite score | This score is computed by averaging z-scores from:
Delayed recall of the CVLT; Delayed recall of the WMS-IV Logical Memory Test. |
T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Executive composite score | This score is computed by averaging z-scores from:
Verbal fluency (VF); Trail Making Test (condition B - A; shifting - processing speed scores); Victoria Stroop (high interference - naming conditions); Divided attention subtest from the Test of Attention Performance 2.3.1 (number of total omissions (visual and auditory)). |
T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Executive composite score | This score is computed by averaging z-scores from:
Verbal fluency (VF); Trail Making Test (condition B - A; shifting - processing speed scores); Victoria Stroop (high interference - naming conditions); Divided attention subtest from the Test of Attention Performance 2.3.1 (number of total omissions (visual and auditory)). |
T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Speed processing composite score | This score is computed by averaging z-scores from:
Trail Making Test (time on condition A); DSST (number of correct symbols); Victoria Stroop (time on naming condition). |
T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive domain: Speed processing composite score | This score is computed by averaging z-scores from:
Trail Making Test (time on condition A); DSST (number of correct symbols); Victoria Stroop (time on naming condition). |
T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Affective domain: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | To measure mood. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Affective domain: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | To measure mood. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Affective domain: Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) | To measure fear of falling. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Affective domain: Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) | To measure fear of falling. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Older People Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL 35). | To measure quality of Life (QoL) | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Older People Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL 35). | To measure quality of Life (QoL) | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) - | To measure subjective difficulties encountered in activities of daily living, related to cognitive functions | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) - | To measure subjective difficulties encountered in activities of daily living, related to cognitive functions | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Everyday Cognition (E-Cog) | To measure subjective difficulties encountered in activities of daily living, related to cognitive functions | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Everyday Cognition (E-Cog) | To measure subjective difficulties encountered in activities of daily living, related to cognitive functions | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Ad-hoc questionnaire | To measure participant's expectation from the training program. The questionnaire is related to the efficacy of the program and its different components, the expectation (difficulty, agreeableness, motivation) and the quality of the introductory courses. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Psycho-social domain: Ad-hoc questionnaire | To measure participant's expectation from the training program. The questionnaire is related to the efficacy of the program and its different components, the expectation (difficulty, agreeableness, motivation) and the quality of the introductory courses. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: ad-hoc computerized test | To measure divided attention trained during Attention! activity with an ad-hoc computerized test designed specifically for this multitasking activity and provided in the form of a serious game. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: ad-hoc computerized test | To measure divided attention trained during Attention! activity with an ad-hoc computerized test designed specifically for this multitasking activity and provided in the form of a serious game. | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition (RBMT-3). | To measure prospective memory trained in the Quiz activity with two subtests ("belonging" and "appointment") | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition (RBMT-3). | To measure prospective memory trained in the Quiz activity with two subtests ("belonging" and "appointment") | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: Flexibility subtest from the Test battery for Attention Performance | To measure concept elaboration trained in the 4images/1 word activity with a "set shifting" computerized task | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: Flexibility subtest from the Test battery for Attention Performance | To measure concept elaboration trained in the 4images/1 word activity with a "set shifting" computerized task | T1 (six months following T0) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: Similitudes subtest from the WAIS-IV: | To measure concept elaboration trained in the 4images/1 word activity and assess verbal reasoning and the development of concepts. | T0 (baseline) | |
| Secondary | Cognitive processes manipulated during training: Similitudes subtest from the WAIS-IV: | To measure concept elaboration trained in the 4images/1 word activity and assess verbal reasoning and the development of concepts. | T1 (six months following T0) |