Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Efficacy of the Cyberlegs Xleg During Daily Activities in People With a Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation
The aim of the project is to evaluate the efficacy of the Cyberlegs X-leg in people with a unilateral transfemoral (above the knee joint) and transtibial (under the knee joint) amputation. De Cyberlegs X-leg is in continuation of the development of the Cyberlegs gamma-prototype (B.U.N. 143201732970; FAMHP reference number: 80M0725). The Cyberlegs X-leg is a motorized prosthesis which replaces the amputated part of the leg. Our hypothesis is that people with a lower limb amputation perform daily activities (e.g. walking, stair climbing, sit to stand, et cetera) easier, more comfortable and more efficient with the X-leg compared to their current prosthesis. Assessments will be based on a holistic approach in which biomechanical, physiological and psychological parameters are determined.
Study design A crossover study and a case study design.
Subjects Number of subjects 14 participants will be recruited for this study.
Inclusion criteria Age:18 - 80 year Gender: men and women Level of amputation: unilateral
transfemoral or transtibial Completed the rehabilitation program Functional Medicare
Classification K-level 2-4
Exclusion criteria Comorbidity (hemiplegia or neurological diseases) Stump pain or bad fit of
the socket
Procedures Recruitment process Experiments will take place at the research group Human
Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy of campus Etterbeek from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel
(Belgium). Participants will be recruited via clinical rehabilitation centers, such as V!GO
(Wetteren or Pellenberg, Belgium), Jessa hospital (Hasselt, Belgium) or via advertisement and
flyers. All participants will be providing written and oral information about the
experimental protocol, potential risks and benefits before giving informed consent to
participate in the study.
Enrolment During a first meeting with the participant (either at home or at the laboratory)
the experiment will be explained, informed consent is given, and a clinical anamnesis will
occur. Eventually, appointments are made for the experiments. If necessary, a copy of the
participants' current socket will be made to optimize fitting and alignment to the novel
prosthesis.
Familiarization The familiarization trial aimed to accustom participants to the experimental
protocol, to get used to the measurements and the novel prosthesis. Participants will get
enough time (60 minutes) to perform the tests with their current and novel prosthesis and to
ensure a good alignment and fitting. Participants will be fitted and aligned to the novel
device by a physiotherapist and prosthetist.
Experimental protocol A (people with a transfemoral amputation) Participants with a Medicare
Functional Classification K-level 2 are asked to visit the laboratory two times for a sit to
stand test with their current prosthesis (first experiment) and the Cyberlegs X-leg (second
experiment). During the sit to stand test (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC):
0.84-0.92), the participants will be asked to rise as often as possible from their chair in
thirty seconds without support of their hands.
Experimental protocol B (people with a transfemoral and -tibial amputation) Participants with
a Medicare Functional Classification K-level 3 and 4 are asked to visit the laboratory two
times for four consecutive tasks with ten minutes of rest in between each task. During the
stair climbing test participants' will be asked to ascend and descend a staircase.
Participants start in front of the staircase and are asked to ascend and descend as fast as
possible. Bilateral handrails are required to allow support when needed. The ascending phase
is initiated with the prosthetic side, while the first step of the descending phase is
performed with the non-involved leg. The second task is the L-test (ICC: 0.97), where
participants are asked to rise from a chair, walk through an office door, turn 90 degrees,
walk down a hallway, turn 180 degrees and then return in the same way to the seated position.
A total distance of 20 meter will be covered. The slope walking test assesses the
participants' ability to ascend and descend an inclined ramp as fast as possible. For safety
reasons bilateral handrails are warranted. Participants start the test in an upright position
in front of the ramp and are asked to ascend the ramp, turn around on the platform, descend
the ramp and return to the starting position. Finally, a hallway six-minute walk test (ICC:
0.90 - 0.96) will be performed on a hallway at a self-selected walking speed, which closely
relates to the most efficient walking speed.
These four tests will be performed in four separate case studies with the POWER knee (Össur,
Reykjavik) compared to the Cyberlegs X-leg, the POWER knee compared to the Cyberlegs X-leg
knee with a passive ankle joint, the current prosthesis (either passive or quasi-passive)
compared to the Cyberlegs X-leg and finally a passive or quasi-passive ankle joint compared
to the Cyberlegs X-leg ankle joint. In the last case study, a participant with a transtibial
amputation will be included.
All appointments will take place at the same hour to counteract circadian rhythm effect, and
at least 24 hours between each session will be planned to counteract mental and physical
fatigue.
Outcome measures and measurement devices Physical performance determinants will be gathered
in terms of duration, number of stands and normal walking speed. Biomechanical outcome
measures (spatiotemporal, kinematics and kinetics) will be recorded during the different
tests with a motion capture system (VICON, UK), portable singe layer sensitive walkway
(GAITRite®, CIR systems, USA) and inertial measurement units (Technaid®, Spain). Outcomes
from these devices include joint angels, pressure plots, cadence, step width and length, and
stance and swing phases. Physiological outcome measures (cardiovascular, respiratory and
electrophysiological) will be collected with a heart rate sensor (Polar® M400, H7-sensor,
Finland), an ergospirometric device (K5®, Cosmed, Italy), a life monitor vest (Equivital®,
USA) and electromyography device (Mini Wave®, Cometa, Italy). Outcome measures from these
devices include heart rate, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, ventilation,
electrocardiogram, skin temperature and muscle activity (peak and mean amplitude).
Psychological outcome measures like the rating of perceived exertion (score between 6-20),
the visual analogue scale ( score on 100) for comfort and fatigue will be collected after the
tests. The EuroQol-5D (score on 100) will be filled in before each trial. Other
questionnaires will be completed during the familiarization, i.e. the mini-mental state
examination (score on 30), the prosthetic evaluation questionnaire and the system usability
scale.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06194838 -
Clinical Outcomes With Non-Powered vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees by K2-level Amputees
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05915065 -
VR to Evaluate Phantom Limb Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05267639 -
Clinical Outcomes With Passive MPKs vs. Powered Prosthetic Knees
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03673371 -
Women's-Specific Footwear With Prosthetic Feet
|
||
Completed |
NCT04239222 -
Feasibility Study to Evaluate a New Energy Storage and Return Prosthetic Foot
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06017024 -
New Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Evaluation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02240186 -
Comparative Effectiveness Between Microprocessor Knees and Non-Microprocessor Knees
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04784429 -
Assessing Outcomes With Microprocessor Knee Utilization in a K2 Population
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06419920 -
Prosthetic Performance Enhancement Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04937179 -
The Effect of Ischemic Conditioning on Strength and Ambulation in Subjects With PAD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03338842 -
Virtual Reality Treatment for Phantom Limb Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05601349 -
TeleEducation for Implementing a Clinical Practice Guideline For Amputees
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03376919 -
The CYBERnetic Lower Limb Cocognitive Ortho-prosthesis Plus Plus, 1st Clinical Study (CLs++)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04700085 -
Reverse Innovation in Western Health Care: the ReMotion Prosthetic Knee.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04051164 -
Progressive Muscle Relaxation Technique on Lower Limb Amputation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04217005 -
Enhancing Abilities in Amputees and Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Through Restoration of Sensory Feedback
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05471375 -
C-STAR Movement Database
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04953364 -
Self-Management for Amputee Rehabilitation Using Technology.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05803317 -
Asymmetry of the Center of Pressure During Gait After Amputation of Lower Limbs
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05407545 -
Evaluation of a Motorised Prosthetic Knee
|
N/A |