Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04037540
Other study ID # FNO-KUCH-01-Jones
Secondary ID CZ.02.1.01/00/00
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2006
Est. completion date December 31, 2018

Study information

Verified date July 2019
Source University Hospital Ostrava
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study deals with the topic of treatment of Jones fracture, comparing surgical and conservative approach. The fracture occurs especially in highly active individuals.


Description:

The study deals with the topic of treatment of Jones fracture, comparing surgical and conservative approach. The fracture occurs especially in highly active individuals.

The study proposes a supposition of recommending the active operational approach, which shortens the period of healing by 6 weeks, limitation of physical activity by 4 weeks, and sick leave by 2 months. It also completely eliminates the need to perform a rigid fixation of the extremity for 8-12 weeks.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 27
Est. completion date December 31, 2018
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Jones fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

- combined injury

- recurring injury

- diabetes mellitus

- chronic renal insufficiency

- osteopathy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Operational approach
Operational approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.
Conservative approach
Conservative approach was used to treat the Jones fracture in patients randomized into the respective study arm.

Locations

Country Name City State
Czechia University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Moravian-Silesian Region

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Hospital Ostrava

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Czechia, 

References & Publications (11)

Dameron TB Jr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Sep;57(6):788-92. — View Citation

Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Sep;60(6):776-82. — View Citation

Landorf KB. Clarifying proximal diaphyseal fifth metatarsal fractures. The acute fracture versus the stress fracture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Aug;89(8):398-404. Review. — View Citation

Malkus T, Soukup B. [Jones fracture.]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1999;66(1):15-21. Czech. — View Citation

Marshall PD, Evans PD, Richards J. Laboratory comparison of the cannulated Herbert bone screw with ASIF cancellous lag screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Jan;75(1):89-92. — View Citation

Mindrebo N, Shelbourne KD, Van Meter CD, Rettig AC. Outpatient percutaneous screw fixation of the acute Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Sep-Oct;21(5):720-3. — View Citation

Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: the Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;32(1):171-80. Review. — View Citation

Pietropaoli MP, Wnorowski DC, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Sep;20(9):560-3. — View Citation

Quill GE Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995 Apr;26(2):353-61. Review. — View Citation

Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;8(5):332-8. Review. — View Citation

STEWART IM. Jones's fracture: fracture of base of fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:190-8. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score - 6 weeks The improvement in The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score from the baseline was observed at 6 weeks after injury on a scale of 0-100. 6 weeks
Primary AOFAS score - 12 months The improvement in The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score from the baseline was observed at 12 months after injury on a scale of 0-100. 12 months
Secondary Signs of healing on X-ray at 6 weeks The presence or absence of signs of healing on X-ray were observed at 6 weeks after injury. 6 weeks
Secondary Signs of healing on X-ray at 12 months The presence or absence of signs of healing on X-ray were observed at 12 months after injury. 6 weeks
Secondary Extremity loading The ability to load the injured extremity was measured in per cent of full loading. 6 weeks