Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04011735
Other study ID # 1237-0097
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date September 30, 2019
Est. completion date February 13, 2020

Study information

Verified date February 2021
Source Boehringer Ingelheim
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The study is to assess patient satisfaction with the inhaler attributes of the re-usable Respimat SMI (Spiriva, Striverdi or Spiolto) in patients with COPD, including patients who are Respimat SMI-experienced and Respimat SMI-naïve. This study also aims to examine patient preference for the re-usable Respimat SMI compared to the disposable Respimat SMI in Respimat SMI-experienced patients switching from a disposable to a re-usable Respimat SMI product at study entry.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 262
Est. completion date February 13, 2020
Est. primary completion date February 13, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 40 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Patients fulfilling all the following inclusion criteria will be eligible for participation in the study: - Provision of signed informed consent prior to study data collection - Patient with COPD aged 40 years or older - Patient prescribed (or already receiving the disposable Respimat SMI and switched to) one of the following re-usable Respimat SMI products per the standard clinical practice: Spiriva 2.5 microgram inhalation solution; (2) Striverdi 2.5 microgram inhalation solution; and (3) Spiolto 2.5 microgram / 2.5 microgram inhalation solution - Patient unlikely to change their Respimat therapy during the 4-6 week observation period (in the opinion of the investigator) Exclusion Criteria: Patients fulfilling any of the following exclusion criteria will not be eligible for participation in the study: - Patient using a disposable Respimat SMI product during the study period - Patient who have had a severe COPD exacerbation requiring hospitalisation in the immediate 3 months prior to study entry - Patient participating in a clinical trial or any other non-interventional study of a drug or device at the time of enrolment - Visual, cognitive, motor or health impairment that, as judged by the investigator, may cause concern regarding the patient's ability to complete the questionnaires - Patient not fluent and literate in one of the main languages of the country

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Respimat
Soft Mist Inhaler product

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Brussels - UNIV UZ Brussel Brussel
Belgium Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce Gosselies
Belgium Roeselare - HOSP AZ Delta Menen
Denmark Hvidovre Hospital Hvidovre
Denmark Vejle Hospital Vejle
Finland TYKS, Keuhkosairauksien klinikka, Turku Turku
Germany Universitätsklinikum Aachen, AöR Aachen
Germany MECS Research GmbH, Berlin Berlin
Germany KPPK GmbH, Studienzentrum Koblenz
Germany Pneumologiezentrum Leipzig Leipzig
Germany Pneumologische Schwerpunktpraxis, 23558 Lübeck Lübeck
Netherlands Amphia Ziekenhuis Breda
Netherlands Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Heerlen
Netherlands Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden Leeuwarden
Netherlands Franciscus Gasthuis Rotterdam
Netherlands Gelre Ziekenhuis Zutphen Zutphen
Norway Frisk Utvikling Helse AS Elverum
Norway Hisøy Legesenter Kolbjørnsvik
Norway Lambertseter Legesenter Oslo
Norway Svelvik Legesenter Svelvik

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Boehringer Ingelheim

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium,  Denmark,  Finland,  Germany,  Netherlands,  Norway, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Total Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) Score Total PASAPQ score is a measure of patient's satisfaction regarding the handling of the re-usable Respimat® SMI. The total score was the sum of the 13 items related to Performance and Convenience PASAPG domains (7 items for Performance domain: Q 1-5, 10-11, and 6 items for convenience domain: Q6-9, 12-13).
Each PASAPQ item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the total and domain score, the items within each domain were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) or 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction:
Performance score = 100 *[(Q1+Q2 +Q3+ Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)-7] /(49-7)
Convenience score = 100 *[(Q6+ Q7+Q8+Q9+Q12+Q13)-6] / (42-6)
Total score = 100 *[(Q1+Q2 +Q3+Q4+ Q5+Q6 + Q7+Q8+ Q9+Q10+Q11+Q12+Q13)-13] / (91-13)
At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Secondary Total Performance PASAPQ Score for All Patients at Study End (Follow-up Assessment) The performance domain score of PASAPQ contained 7 items (Q 1-5 and 10-11), each item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the domain score, the items were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction:
Performance score = 100 * [(Q1+ Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)-7] / (49-7)
At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Secondary Total Convenience PASAPQ Score for All Patients at Study End (Follow-up Assessment) The convenience domain score of PASAPQ contained 6 items (Question 6-9 and 12-13), each item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the domain score, the items were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction:
Convenience score = 100 * [(Q6+Q7+Q8+Q9+Q12+Q13)-6] / (42-6)
At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Secondary Overall Satisfaction Question With Inhaler for All Patients at Study End (Follow-up Assessment) The overall satisfaction score of the PASAPQ asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study (Question 14), answered using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). Reported is the number of patients by category. At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Secondary Question on Willingness to Continue With Inhaler for All Patients at Study End (Follow-up Assessment) To assess the willingness to continue with inhaler, the following questions was asked: "How would you feel about continuing to use the inhaler?", using a value from 0-100, with zero indicating that the patient is not willing to continue using the inhaler and 100 indicating that the patient is definitely willing to continue using the inhaler. At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Secondary Questions on Ease of Handling of the Re-usable Respimat SMI for All Patients at Study End (Follow-up Assessment) 10 Questions regarding the Ease of Handling were asked, using a 7 point scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). Reported is the number of patients by answer category. At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
Secondary Difference in the Mean Total PASAPQ Score Between Study Entry and Study End in Respimat SMI-experienced Patients Who Switched From a Disposable to a Re-usable Respimat SMI Product Difference in the mean Total PASAPQ score between study entry (baseline visit) and at study end (follow-up assessment) in Respimat SMI-experienced patients who switched from a disposable to a re-usable Respimat SMI product at study entry.
The total score was the sum of the 13 items related to Performance and Convenience PASAPG domains (7 items for Performance domain: Q 1-5, 10-11, and 6 items for convenience domain: Q6-9, 12-13).
Each PASAPQ item had response options ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). To calculate the total and domain score, the items within each domain were first summed and then transformed to a 0 (least) or 100 (most) point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
At study entry (baseline) and at study end (4 to 6 weeks after baseline).
Secondary Number of Patients With Preference for Re-usable or Disposable Respimat SMI at Study End in Respimat SMI-experienced Patients Who Switched From a Disposable to a Re-usable Respimat SMI Product Number of patients with preference for re-usable or disposable Respimat SMI at study end (follow-up assessment), in Respimat SMI-experienced patients who switched from a disposable to a re-usable Respimat SMI product at study entry. To assess the preference for inhaler, following question was asked: "Comparing the re-usable with disposable inhaler, which inhaler do you prefer to use?" At follow-up assessment, 4 to 6 weeks after baseline.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05043428 - The Roles of Peers and Functional Tasks in Enhancing Exercise Training for Adults With COPD N/A
Completed NCT00528996 - An Efficacy and Safety Study to Compare Three Doses of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium and Placebo in the Respimat Inhaler. Phase 2
Completed NCT03740373 - A Study to Assess the Pulmonary Distribution of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Phase 1
Completed NCT05402020 - Effectiveness of Tiotropium + Olodaterol Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) Among COPD Patients in Taiwan
Completed NCT05393245 - Safety of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients in Taiwan: a Non-interventional Study Based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Data
Enrolling by invitation NCT03075709 - The Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan
Completed NCT03764163 - Image and Model Based Analysis of Lung Disease Early Phase 1
Completed NCT00515268 - Endotoxin Challenge Study For Healthy Men and Women Phase 1
Completed NCT04085302 - TARA Working Prototype Engagement Evaluation: Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT03691324 - Training of Inhalation Technique in Hospitalized Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients - a Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT02236611 - A 12-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium 62.5 Microgram (mcg) Compared With Glycopyrronium 44 mcg in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT00153075 - Flow Rate Effect Respimat Inhaler Versus a Metered Dose Inhaler Using Berodual in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT01017952 - A Study to Evaluate Annual Rate of Exacerbations and Safety of 3 Dosage Strengths of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT01009463 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/GW642444 Inhalation Powder in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT04882124 - Study of Effect of CSJ117 on Symptoms, Pharmacodynamics and Safety in Patients With COPD Phase 2
Completed NCT02853123 - Effect of Tiotropium + Olodaterol on Breathlessness in COPD Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT02619357 - Method Validation Study to Explore the Sensitivity of SenseWear Armband Gecko for Measuring Physical Activity in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) & Asthma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05858463 - High Intensity Interval Training and Muscle Adaptations During PR N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05032898 - Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inpatient Registry Study Stage II
Completed NCT02837380 - A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Fluticasone Furoate /Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol (100/62.5/25 Microgram [mcg]) After Single and Repeat Dose Administration From a Dry Powder Inhaler in Healthy Chinese Subjects Phase 1

External Links