Severe Refractory Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trial
— SPIDOLOfficial title:
Assessment of Intrathecal Ziconotide Antalgic Efficacy for Severe Refractory Neuropathic Pain Due to Spinal Cord Lesions.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) has an average prevalence of 50 per 100.000 in general population
(30.000 patients with SCI in France) with estimates of the overall prevalence for severe
neuropathic pain ranges from 30 to 51% (up to 10.000 patients in France).
Patients with such spinal lesions may develop neuropathic pain called sublesional pain as
perceived in an area below the level of injury. A second type of pain is at level of injury,
i.e. perceived in a segmental pattern within the dermatome corresponding the spinal cord and
nerve roots. These two types of pain are very harmful and are notoriously difficult to treat
probably because of complex pathogenic mechanisms due to abnormal functioning of deafferented
spinal and supraspinal nociceptive neurons.
Opioids, whatever be the route of administration, had demonstrated their inefficacy for these
patients as well as several surgical techniques. So, chronic pain in relation with spinal
lesion can be defined as real refractory pain.
Synaptic release of neurotransmitters is dependent on calcium intake trough voltage dependent
channels. Type 2.1 or N-Type channels are specific for nociceptive system and can be blocked
by a peptic neurotoxin: Ziconotide. Blocking these specific calcium channels neuromodulates
nociception. Intrathecal use of Ziconotide, bringing the active molecule close to its
receptors, has a proven clinical impact for a wide variety of pain (4). The intrathecal
Ziconotide (ITZ) infusion using an implanted pump is validated for treatment of pain
refractory to systemic analgesics (HAS, avis du 14-27 mai 2008). Meanwhile, no data are
available in literature on positive effects of ITZ on specific spinal neuropathic pain.
A pilot study was performed by the coordinator team using ITZ on 12 patients with spinal
pain: 8 patients had > 40% decrease of pain on numeric scale, 6 patients beneficiated from
implanted pump allowing chronic ITZ treatment inducing 60% numeric scale decrease in average
with 1 year follow-up.
Therefore intrathecal Ziconotide could be an excellent candidate for the treatment of spinal
pain where the pain generators may be difficult to target by other available treatments.
This study is the first to assess ITZ (as IT antalgic monotherapy) versus placebo with a
randomized controlled study with long follow-up. Trials have already been performed but not
specially targeted spinal pain, and did not exceed three weeks follow-up.
Long term effects of Ziconotide on memory, cognition and mood have not been evaluated. In
fact even though short term adverse effects on higher level functions have been described
they have not been assessed in a placebo controlled situation.
Moreover, treating (successfully or not) patients with spinal pain could bring valuable
insights both into the mechanisms of pain production in SCI patients and in the mechanisms of
Ziconotide action: a positive result on pain below the injury level would imply action on the
second or third order synapses of the nociceptive pathways. Similarly an effect at the level
of pain, in absence of an effect below the level pain would argue discussion against such
action. The impact of ITZ on the different clinical components of pain experienced by the
patients, could also give some data on neuromodulation mechanism induced by the therapy.
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Enrollment | 44 |
| Est. completion date | September 20, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | December 20, 2019 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - • Patient > 18 year old - Patients with stabilized spinal cord lesion - Patients with refractory neuropathic pain with "Douleur Neuropathique" (DN4) score >4 at selection and failure at least of 2 classes of antineuropathic pain drugs alone or in association - Experiences pain > 5/10 on numeric scale - Patients with a positive trial test to Ziconotide either by lumbar puncture or by continuous infusion above the lesioned level via an implanted catheter - Evaluation performed both by a multidisciplinary team in a pain center and a rehabilitation center - Patients eligible to surgical implantation of a subcutaneous pump - Signed informed consent - Patients benefiting from a social insurance system or a similar system Exclusion Criteria: - • Life expectancy < 5 years - Suffering from other neuropathic pain or chronic pain due to cancer - Being treated with spinal cord stimulation, nerve stimulation, intrathecal analgesic delivery system with analgesic drug (except Baclofen) until the last 6 months - Implant ITZ surgery contraindication (MRI or anesthesia contraindication, coagulation disorder, Immunodepression, current infection, critical respiratory and/or heart illness) - Unable to operate the ITZ equipment or comply with study requirements - Suspicion of substance abuse - Current or planned pregnancy - Patients with urinary tract disorder or urinary retention - Patient under or planning to go under electromagnetic transcranial stimulation or planning to - Patient unable to understand the purpose of the trial or refusing to follow treatment and post-treatment instructions - Patients with history of psychiatric disorder or hallucination - Participation to another trial that would interfere with this trial - Patients under legal protection |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Hospices Civils de Lyon |
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in pain between both treatment arms assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) | The primary endpoint is the comparison, for each patient, of the mean pain intensity, within the last two week before the end of treatment, between two conditions: under Intrathecal Ziconotide (ITZ) and intrathecal (IT) placebo, using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain and 10 being the highest level of pain.The final endpoint will be measured after 6 months of treatment and 6 months of placebo (or vice versa according to the random assignation of first treatment in this cross over design study), that is to say after a total of 12 months of treatment. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Long term analgesic effect of intrathecal Ziconotide assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) | Continuous evaluation of pain intensity will be assessed using a visual analogic scale during the 12 months of treatment. Pain intensity will be measured using visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10 with 0 being the lowest level of pain and 10 being the highest level of pain . The patient identifies his level of pain on this graduated line. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Analgesic effect of at least 30% | Percentage of patients with at least 30% of pain reduction base on numeric scale within the last week before the end of treatment. Pain intensity will be measured using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain and 10 being the highest level of pain. The patient identifies his level of pain on this graduated line. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of Severe Adverse Events (SAE) | Declaration of all severe adverse event occurring during the 12 months period of treatment. Each event will be analyzed by an independent committee to evaluate the immutability of the experimental treatment. | over the 12 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of patient satisfaction with pain treatment at first visit to refill the pump (1 month) assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) | Satisfaction level of patient's pain relief will be assessed using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of satisfaction and 10 being the highest satisfaction. The patient identifies his level of satisfaction of pain relief on this graduated line. | 1 month | |
| Secondary | Evaluation patient satisfaction of pain relief with the treatment at 6 months assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) | Satisfaction level of patient's pain relief will be assessed using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of satisfaction and 10 being the highest satisfaction. The patient identifies his level of satisfaction of pain relief on this graduated line. | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation patient satisfaction of pain relief with the treatment 12 months assessed by the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) | Satisfaction level of patient's pain relief will be assessed using visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of satisfaction and 10 being the highest satisfaction. The patient identifies his level of satisfaction of pain relief on this graduated line. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on spontaneous pain duration | Duration (average time per day) | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on spontaneous pain duration | Duration (average time per day) | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on spontaneous pain duration | Duration (average time per day) | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on spontaneous pain intensity | Intensity of spontaneous pain will be assessed using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of intensity of pain and 10 being the highest intensity of pain. The patient identifies his level of pain intensity on this graduated line. | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on spontaneous pain intensity | intensity (numeric scale) of spontaneous pain. This numeric scale is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of intensity of pain and 10 being the highest intensity of pain. T The patient identifies his level of pain intensity on this graduated line. | initial evaluation 6 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on spontaneous pain intensity | intensity (numeric scale) of spontaneous pain. This numeric scale is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. The patient identifies his level of pain intensity on this graduated line. | initial evaluation 12 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on provoked pain duration | Duration (average time per day) | initial evaluation | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on provoked pain duration | Duration (average time per day) | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on provoked pain duration | Duration (average time per day) | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on provoked pain intensity | Intensity of provoked pain will be assessed using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on provoked pain intensity | intensity of provoked pain will be assessed using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic effect on provoked pain intensity | intensity of provoked pain will be assessed using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Quality of life at inclusion assessed by the Short Form questionnaire (SF12) | Quality of life will be assessed using the 12 items Short Form questionnaire (SF12). It is a self-reported multipurpose questionnaire generic measure of health status. It measure in 12 questions, 8 concepts: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. A specific algorithm gives a standardized total score between 0 and 100 for physical and mental summary scale. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Quality of life at 6 months assessed by the Short Form questionnaire (SF12) | Quality of life will be assessed using the 12 items Short Form questionnaire (SF12). It is a self-reported multipurpose questionnaire generic measure of health status. It measure in 12 questions, 8 concepts: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. A specific algorithm gives a standardized total score between 0 and 100 for physical and mental summary scale. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Quality of life at 12 months assessed by the Short Form questionnaire (SF12) | Quality of life will be assessed using the 12 items Short Form questionnaire (SF12). It is a self-reported multipurpose questionnaire generic measure of health status. It measure in 12 questions, 8 concepts: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. A specific algorithm gives a standardized total score between 0 and 100 for physical and mental summary scale. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Patient global impression of change | Patient global impression of change estimated using a using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. | at one months of treatment (first refill of the pump) | |
| Secondary | Patient global impression of change | Patient global impression of change estimated using a using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Patient global impression of change | Patient global impression of change estimated using a visual analogic scale (VAS). This VAS is a graduated line from 0 to 10, 0 being the lowest level of pain intensity and 10 being the highest pain intensity. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Analgesic drugs intake at inclusion | Quantification of analgesic drugs intake per day with differentiation of class of analgesics. | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Analgesic drugs intake at 12 months | Quantification of analgesic drugs intake per day with differentiation of class of analgesics. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of cognition effects induced by ITZ at inclusion | Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire will be used to evaluate cognition effect. Each 30 questions is one point. Patients with score greater than 27 has no mental issue, between 24 et 27 light dementia, less than 24 dementia. | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of cognition effects induced by ITZ at 6 months | Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire will be used to evaluate cognition effect. Each 30 questions is one point. Patients with score greater than 27 has no mental issue, between 24 et 27 light dementia, less than 24 dementia. | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Evaluation of cognition effects induced by ITZ at 12 months | Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire will be used to evaluate cognition effect. Each 30 questions is one point. Patients with score greater than 27 has no mental issue, between 24 et 27 light dementia, less than 24 dementia. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Measure of neuro- psychological effects of depression induced by ITZ | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for depression include 7 questions with a score from 0 to 3. If the score is greater than 11 then the patient suffer from depression | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Measure of neuro- psychological effects of depression induced by ITZ | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for depression include 7 questions with a score from 0 to 3. If the score is greater than 11 then the patient suffer from depression | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Measure of neuro- psychological effects of depression induced by ITZ | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for depression include 7 questions with a score from 0 to 3. If the score is greater than 11 then the patient suffer from depression | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Measure of neuro- psychological anxiety effects induced by ITZ | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety include 7 questions with a score from 0 to 3. If the score is greater than 11 then the patient suffer from anxiety. | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Measure of neuro- psychological anxiety effects induced by ITZ | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety include 7 questions with a score from 0 to 3. If the score is greater than 11 then the patient suffer from anxiety. | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Measure of neuro- psychological anxiety effects induced by ITZ | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety include 7 questions with a score from 0 to 3. If the score is greater than 11 then the patient suffer from anxiety. | 12 months | |
| Secondary | Impact of ITZ on psycho-social status of patients | Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) score to assess the patient's physical and emotional distress associated with their pain condition. The scale is composed of 13 questions with a score for each questions going from 0 to 4. The final score is the addition of the score of each question, going from 0 to 52. Patient with a score greater than the 75% percentile mean value is at high risk of pain chronicity. Patient with a score between the 50 % and 75% percentile mean value is at moderate risk of pain chronicity | 1 month before initiation of treatment | |
| Secondary | Impact of ITZ on psycho-social status of patients | Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) score to assess the patient's physical and emotional distress associated with their pain condition. The scale is composed of 13 questions with a score for each questions going from 0 to 4. The final score is the addition of the score of each question, going from 0 to 52. Patient with a score greater than the 75% percentile mean value is at high risk of pain chronicity. Patient with a score between the 50 % and 75% percentile mean value is at moderate risk of pain chronicity | 6 months | |
| Secondary | Impact of ITZ on psycho-social status of patients | Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) score to assess the patient's physical and emotional distress associated with their pain condition. The scale is composed of 13 questions with a score for each questions going from 0 to 4. The final score is the addition of the score of each question, going from 0 to 52. Patient with a score greater than the 75% percentile mean value is at high risk of pain chronicity. Patient with a score between the 50 % and 75% percentile mean value is at moderate risk of pain chronicity | 12 months |